• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

6.5-257 Roberts or 6.5x57

I'm looking to build a rifle in something other than 6.5 Swedish or 260 Rem, just because I want something different. I do a lot of reading, mostly internet articles and blurbs, and I like the 6.5-257 Roberts or 6.5x57 Mauser options. But now I need to make a final cut. So, I'm looking for input as to which cartridge might be the better choice.

This rifle is being built on a mauser action so for now it will just be used for hunting and some general target shooting. If I like the way it shoots, I will probably build on a better platform for some low key competition shooting. So, here are my questions.

Are there any major differences in the two cartridges? Is it better or easier to neck up or down? Is there any fire forming which must be done with either cartridge? Is there any appreciable performance gain in an improved version,28, 30 or 40 degree)? Do the improved versions burn out barrels any faster than non-improved? And finally, are there any published pressure specifications on either?

I appreciate any comments. I know some of these questions may seem obvious, but I've seen conflicting info on some of these, so just looking to get input from some seasoned shooters.

Thanks,
John
 
I saw that no one has shown any interest yet, so I'll pipe up.
I juat answered another thread with about this same thing.
I have a rifle,and dies) that were built by P.O. Ackly back in the late 60's. It is a 6.5X257 Roberts AI and as I said in that other thread, thats a pretty convoluted title because I form my brass from 7X57 with a straight neckdown to 6.5 then fireform.
It is a very peppy rifle. I shoot the 125 SKG most of the time, at about 3100 fps with 4831. If I ever have the time I'm going to try to work up some loads using slower powder as there is sone room left in the cases with 4831. I haven't shot it in a while, but I just finished loading 50 rds for it, that will last me a long time. This rifle has never shifted zero on me and I haven't moved the scope since I got it 10 yrs or so ago.
It isn't a bad overbore, and I don't shoot it much, so I don't think I'll ever shoot the barrel out. It is a fine caliber though. The rifle has taken a big black bear, an elk, several Antelope and enough deer to fill a truck or two.

Woops...I forgot to adddress your other concerns!
6.5X257 Roberts and 6.5X7X57 are the same as far as I can tell.
Yes you will get a little more performance out of the AI version depending on bbl length, maybe 100 to 200 fps. As neither would be a huge overbore, barrel life should be quite good. You will have to fireform to the AI version but you can do that as you practice, sight in and hunt. Not a big pain in the a$$ either way.
Mark
 
I think you may have received some misinformation. Both the 257 Bob and 6mm Rem are simply necked down 7 x 57 Mausers. If you neck down--the parent-- the 7 x 57, to 6.5mm/.264 you could call it
6.5 x 6mm Rem
264 x 6mm Rem
6.5 x 257
264 x 257
6.5 x 57
264 x 57
and they ALL are the same cartridge.
Hope this helps.
 
I've own a 6mmRem, 6mmAI' and a .257Bob and all shot well with the right loads. I can't think of a single reason why a 6.5x57 or better yet 6.5x57AI wouldn't make a great flat shooting deer rifle but you'd need a minimum 24' barrel length to get the AI version up close to full potential. Now with a 26' Shilen in their magnum sporter contour .650 at the muzzle it should make a sweet deer stand / bean field rifle. Please do let us know how it turns out when you build yours.

Regards
RJ
 
Here is some load info for the improved version...

http://www.accuratereloading.com/6.5roberts.html

If you like being able to get cheap ammo, grafs listed
6.5 mauser by PRVI for 16.99 a box.

Are you building on a commercial action or military?
 
I had to dig out my Hornady manual to look this all over, but here is the scoop.

1) the 6.5x57 is European cartridge based off the 7x57, but with a slightly different shoulder angle,18 degrees, 55 minutes).

2) the .257 Roberts retains the same shoulder angle,20 degrees, 45 minutes) as it's parent cartridge, the 7x57.

Therefore, the 6.5-257 Roberts and the 6.5x57 are NOT the same. Th 6.5-257 and the 6.5-7x57,note the difference from the 6.5x57) would be the same.

3) While the 6mm remington is based off the 7x57, it has a much different shoulder angle,26degrees) and so it, too, would be different.

In essence, you can call the 6.5- 257 Roberts and a straight neck down of the 7x57 as the same cartridge, but NOT as most of the combinations mentioned. Assuming they are the same will lead to mistakes and frustrations, with the possibility of injury to the shooter - though probably remote.
 
6.5x57 either ai or straight. run your 7x57 brass thru a 6.5x57 fl die and your done. sounds like a good build. 6.5x55 swed. is also a popular choice for people building on a small ring mauser. many shoot the original barrel. if your building on a large ring mauser you may also consider a 6.5x284.
 
I know this is an old thread but in reading it I see much misinfoy. The actual 6.5 x 57 is based on the 8x57 Mauser, necked down to 6.5mm. the difference between it and necking down the 7x57 is much more than shoulder angle the 6.5 x 57 has it's shoulder farther forward than the 7x57 case so an actual 6.5x57 Mauser case won't chamber in a 6.5 x 257 Roberts chamber. It also holds about 4gr more powder than the Roberts version. I blew mine out to the Ackley version and my 6.5x57 AI has the same case capacity as the 6.5 x 284 Norma.
 
The 6.5-57 may possibly have a higher pressure rating than the 6.5-257.
CIP somewhat traditionally approves higher pressures than SAAMI. Although neither are SAAMI cartridges that i'm aware of.
 
In the early 1950 it was commmon to rechamber the Arasaka rifle to 6.5-257. The only reason people did this was to get reloadable ammo. Little soft point ammo was available and the only brass was Berdan primed.

Today Norma sells ammo and brass with standard boxer primers. So it IS VERY reloadable today.

There is no advantage to the 6.6-257 over the the original 6.5 jap.

Just get your self some Norma brass and go to work. IF I was going to spend money on a WW-2 Jap rifle, I think the first thing I'd do is get the muzzle re-crowned. Most of these were treated badly immediately after the war.

Just my 2 cents!
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,954
Messages
2,187,249
Members
78,614
Latest member
dlljr416
Back
Top