• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

45cal in 45-70 brass

Bottom line: Give up on the idea and try to sell those bullets. Then try to find some cast lead .458" flat-points at about 350 to 405 grains and a good powder in the range of maybe H322 or IMR 3031. The listed suggestions should make it easier to craft loads that will feed and cycle in your firearm. Using the loading manual that you should not take another step before buying, work carefully from a starting load up.
Only do this after you have read and re-read the loading section and data.
Best of all, locate an experienced loader in your area who can mentor you. Much easier than asking partial questions lacking important details and people trying to figure out how to help you. Everyone is willing to help, but you have to do your part too.
Hi, thks for your input,I have 3 loading manuals,Lyman,Hornady and Lee, been reloading 243,308 and 7 rem mag, it's just that I bought these bullets by mistake(458) and couldn't find any info online if I could use them in my new Winchester 1886 45-70.....
 

Attachments

  • 20220427_173203.jpg
    20220427_173203.jpg
    492.8 KB · Views: 6
  • 20220427_173145.jpg
    20220427_173145.jpg
    519.4 KB · Views: 7
  • 20220426_210659.jpg
    20220426_210659.jpg
    293 KB · Views: 6
Bottom line: Give up on the idea and try to sell those bullets. Then try to find some cast lead .458" flat-points at about 350 to 405 grains and a good powder in the range of maybe H322 or IMR 3031. The listed suggestions should make it easier to craft loads that will feed and cycle in your firearm. Using the loading manual that you should not take another step before buying, work carefully from a starting load up.
Only do this after you have read and re-read the loading section and data.
Best of all, locate an experienced loader in your area who can mentor you. Much easier than asking partial questions lacking important details and people trying to figure out how to help you. Everyone is willing to help, but you have to do your part too.
 

Attachments

  • 20220427_173203.jpg
    20220427_173203.jpg
    492.8 KB · Views: 4
  • 20220427_173145.jpg
    20220427_173145.jpg
    519.4 KB · Views: 4
  • 20220426_210659.jpg
    20220426_210659.jpg
    293 KB · Views: 4
Did some grande 0 math and if you were to load these long ass 450 gr mono bullets at 2.700"-2.750" COAL, you can use 35 to 37 gr of H-4895. I would NOT go over 37 just because you're already in the twilight zone of the unknown.
 
2.630 is the longest I can get to cycle through my 1886 action before I have issues. I would seat the bullets at their correct length for the cannelure and chamber them singley.
No sense in pushing velocities really high, H4895, IMR4895, IMR4198, AA5744, etc all work great in even in reduced charge weights.
 
The browning designed 1886 is WAY stronger than a Marlin action. Marlin's weakpoints are the recievers which become a failure point when north of 43,000psi, this isn't an issue on the Winchesters. Manufacturers like Big Horn Armory chamber 1892's(a smaller derivative of the 1886) in 460 S&W(60,000psi).
I would only use trapdoor data if it was an original 1886 and never above it, but any modern reproduction is easily stronger than any Marlin period.
What I have in post #24 was poorly written. It was not meant to question the action strength as much as the load data by Barnes.

Barnes data is listed as Ruger #1 and Marlin 1895 loads. They state that their loads are tested to 42,000 PSI for the Marlin vs 55,000 for the Ruger. That was the distinction I was meaning to reference.

Using Their Marlin data in different rifles, one 1886 Browning, the others were 1885, showed severely flattened primers in the 1886 and one of the 1885's at just over starting loads. They also use a couple not so popular powders, 1680 and N120.

Same powder charges and relative seating depth using jacketed bullets, did not have the same flattened primers. I don't shoot Barnes bullets in my 45-70's but when I tried them, my experience was early pressures signs at lower charge weights that seemed more bullet design/composition related than weight.

I shoot a 550 grain cast in the Browning 1886 that is about 1.450" long. Feeds and chambers fine at 2.765" and is stable out to 400 yards at 1300 MV. Farthest I have shot it.

I think stability may be the biggest problem with the 450 grain Barnes in a 1/20 twist. it might be fine at short distances. Expansion is not really on the table.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSL
Using Their Marlin data in different rifles, one 1886 Browning, the others were 1885, showed severely flattened primers in the 1886 and one of the 1885's at just over starting loads.
I do remember looking at some of Barnes data and thinking that sounds hot.
I seldom load much above trapdoor levels anyway because I like my shoulder and if I'm hunting with cast it will go through the animal at any speed.
 
I in the "nope, sell them" crowd. I think you are wasting good bullets in a kinda worthless pursuit, cause you are not going to get the velocity you need to make them "work". They will be like a solid.

You can find some cast lead bullets if you look, and they will shoot MUCH better in your application than these mistake bullets.
 
I prefer the Speer 350gr FN that is designed for the 458 Mag in my Marlin 45-70. A excellent bullet at 1900 to 2000 fps expansion and retention is excellent very similar to bonded bullet performance in my 45-70.

For bullet design if you have a tubular rifle like the Marlin I do not suggest pointed bullets. The Speer 350 gr works great in Tubular magazines but some like the pointed Barnes bullets would work in Ruger No 1 single fired weapons and like.
 

Attachments

  • 8D223AD3-3C9E-4C2E-8200-156D2BCDC393.jpeg
    8D223AD3-3C9E-4C2E-8200-156D2BCDC393.jpeg
    30 KB · Views: 7
  • 87871E44-C955-45BE-892D-36D64BA3DE93.jpeg
    87871E44-C955-45BE-892D-36D64BA3DE93.jpeg
    210.4 KB · Views: 6
  • FF897B71-50DE-4E5A-B2DC-49A466E86F2C.jpeg
    FF897B71-50DE-4E5A-B2DC-49A466E86F2C.jpeg
    61.2 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
2.630 is the longest I can get to cycle through my 1886 action before I have issues. I would seat the bullets at their correct length for the cannelure and chamber them singley.
No sense in pushing velocities really high, H4895, IMR4895, IMR4198, AA5744, etc all work great in even in reduced charge weights.
Ran the #'s and at 2.620" COAL, the MAX charge weight would be around 34 gr of H-4895. I'd start at 31 gr.
When loaded at 2.620", I hope the case mouth is still on the bearing surface of the bullet and not the nose.

Software predicts 31 gr H-4895 = 21,000 psi and 34 gr = 26,000 psi.
 
When loaded at 2.620", I hope the case mouth is still on the bearing surface of the bullet and not the nose.
I think for that bullet, it would be on the nose. If you must shoot them then better to just treat it like a single shot, seat them to the last groove and have some really long bullets.
 
I would suggest some 350-400gr Powder coated RNFP 0.458 or 0.459" diameter bullets. Many cast bullet suppliers have such a critter in their catalogs online. Looks like your bullets are for the 458 mag and .458" diameter. As said, try and sell those and get the appropriate bullets for your '86
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,838
Messages
2,204,666
Members
79,160
Latest member
Zardek
Back
Top