Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1smalljohnson said:Note: This below is not a "bash" against any company. Rather, a comparative statement between chambers. The use of "Norma" and "Lapua" must be used, as it describes CIP and SAAMI chambers.
I would tend to disagree with the brass life statement. .338 Norma brass should survive as long as, if not longer than .338 Lapua brass, ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL. But, things are not equal from the metalurgy standpont. Both companies make excellent brass, as good as or better than those presently manufactured in the US. However, they may anneal slightly differently, use different grain structures, or have different proprietary steps in manufacture. Those variables MAY contribute to longer or shorter brass life. But gas flow dynamics, heat localization, pressures generated and brass obduration against the chamber wall have more to do with inherent brass life, when considering the statement of which brass lasts longer, given a chamber called out.
Second, energy on target given both cartridges are very much on par. Given a constant magazine length of 3.7 ish inches, both loaded cartridges hold the same volume.
Third, there are certain non-voodo characteristics of the .338 Norma which enable it to surpass accuracy and barrel life characteristics, over the .338 Lapua. Before anybody cries fowl on that statement, I encourage folks who have indeed shot all those, and know those, to chime in. I can tell you I've got both barrel life and accuracy real-life experience with all above, and my experience has been the same as others experiences with both cartridges.
Fourth, and this is a big one..... Find someone, an actual shooter, who is perfectly happy with their .338 Lapua. Ask them or ask yourself if you've ever and always shot very consistent tiny groups... or if ~ every couple shots or so, you just can't seem to get rid of that flyer.... You won't hear that statement from those shooting the .338 Norma.
I have nothing to gain by either cartridge being superior. But I've studied both, I know both, I have a good bit of experience with both, and I just want to pass along my findings.
1smalljohnson said:Fourth, and this is a big one..... Find someone, an actual shooter, who is perfectly happy with their .338 Lapua. Ask them or ask yourself if you've ever and always shot very consistent tiny groups... or if ~ every couple shots or so, you just can't seem to get rid of that flyer.... You won't hear that statement from those shooting the .338 Norma.
Fourth, and this is a big one..... Find someone, an actual shooter, who is perfectly happy with their .338 Lapua. Ask them or ask yourself if you've ever and always shot very consistent tiny groups... or if ~ every couple shots or so, you just can't seem to get rid of that flyer.... You won't hear that statement from those shooting the .338 Norma.
Desert Fox said:Fourth, and this is a big one..... Find someone, an actual shooter, who is perfectly happy with their .338 Lapua. Ask them or ask yourself if you've ever and always shot very consistent tiny groups... or if ~ every couple shots or so, you just can't seem to get rid of that flyer.... You won't hear that statement from those shooting the .338 Norma.
I'm the actual shooter you're talking about. But sorry my friend, I'm perfectly happy with my 338 Lapua. Flyer! non existent with my rifle. If ever there was one, I attributed it to me not the rifle.
20 shot group at 1000 yards.
![]()
Typical 5 shot group at 100 meters.
![]()
![]()
just think what he could have done with a solid bench and a high dollar rest and bag setup, congrats Desert Fox, job well done.
tom said:Forgot to add, I use it as and is strictly single shot.
Tom