• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

30BR powder dilemma

I was loading 33.6grains. I played with a drop tube a little tonight. With the tube, I can fit 36 in. I will creep up on 36, watching for pressure. I will find my seating depth too.

Thanks for the help. This forum is a wonderful well of knowledge to draw from.
 
I had a load that filled the case. Using an 18" drop tube, I could seat the bullet without crunching. A little vibration can also help. I use a vibratory trickler with no powder. Just touch the case to it and the level will usually drop .1-.2".
 
In the "usual" charge-weight range (33.8-34.8Gr.), as displayed on match report equipment-lists, H-4198, with bullets of up to 125 Gr., and barrels between 21 & 24" long, usually produces about 3020-3050fps. The much denser H-322 - at [Jones] mearure setting which throws H-4198/34.8Gr. - weighs in at 37.2Gr weight, but produces about 100fps less velocity: precision is usually equal. DITTO BenchMark. As pointed out by Dave Berg, these charges will result in almost level-full case fill: the charge will be compatced.

The (ADI manufactured) H-4227 worked quite well, the down-side for many people seemed to be that there was always room for more . . . & they could not resist tipping the can, so, first, the groups "blew-up", followed by pressure wrecking their brass! IMR4227 should work well also, as could N-120, which, early on, also I tried, but in the Ronnie Long smithed Morrison barrel, did not deliver consistency. In that barrel, though via H-4227, MUCH HIGHER velocity was possible, the precision window was 2950fps, +/- a little: the charge-weight was 29.5gr . . . nicley serendipitous.

There are a number of other powders which, in early testing, "worked" well (produced precision grouping) - just not as well as the H-4198 & those listed above. A brief list, some of which, even in good times, are unavailable: RL-7; Tu2000 (great if you can find it); Lt-30; N-130.

Though developed specifically for the 30BR capacity & expansion ratio, the Lt30 which came in the original (initial production LOT) jugs, was not the stuff, based upon the prototyping DATA, which we expected.:oops: The bulk-density did/does not accommodate the charge-weights, thus, velocity which we were shown. We were (I was) expecting a bulk-density equal to H-322, featuring the H-4198 burn-rate - my Lt-30, is slightly less dense than my H-4198 - performance (precision) is about equal.

Precision should always trump velocity. Keep 'em ON the X! RG

P.S. I have not chronographed a 30BR barrel for many years - the last time I did, was to compare LV (21") & HV (24") barrels, using the same components - for a pair of ten-shot strings, the Oehler displayed an average difference of 21FPS, or, 7FPS per inch. That was not a cut-off test - there could be that much difference between two barrels of equal length, from the same manufacturer.;)
 
Last edited:
I agree Greg with you 100%. Lets face it 90% of the guys we shoot against use H4198, and there is a good reason, it just flat out works better than any other powder in a 30BR. Ya I have a ton of N130 and a decent amount of LT30 left after I sold most of it, but H4198 just works better in OUR neck of the woods especially when it's colder and It's less temp sensitive than the other 2 powders.
 
I was loading 33.6grains. I played with a drop tube a little tonight. With the tube, I can fit 36 in. I will creep up on 36, watching for pressure. I will find my seating depth too.

Thanks for the help. This forum is a wonderful well of knowledge to draw from.

Watching this thread. Post up some targets as you work through your LT-32 powder testing. Love the 30BR and 30BR threads..

These are really nice for packing more powder in your 30BR cases:
Benchrite

Steve can get you a longer one also if 10" isn't enough. This funnel helped me a lot when I was doing load testing with H322:

H322
 
Last edited:
what made the difference in my rifle was 108gr bullets. Running 36-37 gr in my 30BR with H4198 Is definitely the ticket at 3200fps woke this gun up. Wish I had a couple thousand of them. Long drop tube and very slow drop I had about an 1/8” from the top. Won a group shoot at 300 yds with a .2303 Ag. After the PPC shooters said it wouldn't compete with them, 2nd place was .26xx. So it was a stomping, lol.
The really nice thing was, this gun would wear me out shooting 115gr bullets in one match, but when I went with the light bullets, I could shoot two matches without any issues
 
what made the difference in my rifle was 108gr bullets. Running 36-37 gr in my 30BR with H4198 Is definitely the ticket at 3200fps woke this gun up. Wish I had a couple thousand of them. Long drop tube and very slow drop I had about an 1/8” from the top. Won a group shoot at 300 yds with a .2303 Ag. After the PPC shooters said it wouldn't compete with them, 2nd place was .26xx. So it was a stomping, lol.
The really nice thing was, this gun would wear me out shooting 115gr bullets in one match, but when I went with the light bullets, I could shoot two matches without any issues
Who makes these 108's? Contact info?
 
what made the difference in my rifle was 108gr bullets. Running 36-37 gr in my 30BR with H4198 Is definitely the ticket at 3200fps woke this gun up. Wish I had a couple thousand of them. Long drop tube and very slow drop I had about an 1/8” from the top. Won a group shoot at 300 yds with a .2303 Ag. After the PPC shooters said it wouldn't compete with them, 2nd place was .26xx. So it was a stomping, lol.
The really nice thing was, this gun would wear me out shooting 115gr bullets in one match, but when I went with the light bullets, I could shoot two matches without any issues
Wow I'm getting 3100FPS with some 108 Clines that I have using 34.3 grains of H4198 with a 23" Krieger 17TW with my newer Farley Black Widow. I'm getting the same speed with my other FBW same length BBL, same twist but using 34.5 grains with the same bullet. I just tried putting 37 grains in my case with a 20" drop tube and it came up 3/32" short of filling the entire case. As far as telling the difference between 108's and 115's I can't notice any difference in recoil and I've been shooting both for quite a while.
 
Last edited:
Wow I'm getting 3100FPS with some 108 Clines that I have using 34.3 grains of H4198 with a 23" Krieger 17TW with my newer Farley Black Widow. I'm getting the same speed with my other FBW same length BBL, same twist but using 34.5 grains with the same bullet. I just tried putting 37 grains in my case with a 20" drop tube and it came up 3/32" short of filling the entire case. As far as telling the difference between 108's and 115's I can't notice any difference in recoil and I've been shooting both for quite a while.
Ya but they don't work in the wind, remember?
 
I worked up to 35.6 gr of LT-32 in .3 increments today. 35.6 broke into 3000fps with no pressure with 115 Bergers. Next time I will add some more untill I see pressure or run out of room for more powder.
I also will address neck tension issues. I had no tension today at all. Seemed to shoot tighter with more powder.

100yds, 5 shot groups. 2 at each charge level. Windy day, I am not that good.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I worked up to 35.6 gr of LT-32 in .3 increments today. 35.6 broke into 3000fps with no pressure with 115 Bergers. Next time I will add some more untill I see pressure or run out of room for more powder.
I also will address neck tension issues. I had no tension today at all. Seemed to shoot tighter with more powder.

100yds, 5 shot groups. 2 at each charge level. Windy day, I am not that good.
You should be using either a .323 or .324 bushing. Those 2 bushing have always worked the best in the dozens of 30BR barrels that I own with the .330 necks that I run.
 
Most like H 4198. Tommy Mc 112 and 115 gr.pills
Contact info for the 112 & 115 Tommy Mc pills? I have a brand new 30 BR and have shot the 118 eazors and some Bib bullets but the lighter bullets would I suspect make it a little less hard on the shoulder...
 
In the "usual" charge-weight range (33.8-34.8Gr.), as displayed on match report equipment-lists, H-4198, with bullets of up to 125 Gr., and barrels between 21 & 24" long, usually produces about 3020-3050fps. The much denser H-322 - at [Jones] mearure setting which throws H-4198/34.8Gr. - weighs in at 37.2Gr weight, but produces about 100fps less velocity: precision is usually equal. DITTO BenchMark. As pointed out by Dave Berg, these charges will result in almost level-full case fill: the charge will be compatced.

The (ADI manufactured) H-4227 worked quite well, the down-side for many people seemed to be that there was always room for more . . . & they could not resist tipping the can, so, first, the groups "blew-up", followed by pressure wrecking their brass! IMR4227 should work well also, as could N-120, which, early on, also I tried, but in the Ronnie Long smithed Morrison barrel, did not deliver consistency. In that barrel, though, via H-4227, MUCH HIGHER velocity was possible, the precision window was 2950fps, +/- a little: the charge-weight was 29.5gr . . . nicley serendipitous.

There are a number of other powders which, in early testing, "worked" well (produced precision grouping) - just not as well as the H-4198 & those listed above. A brief list, some of which, even in good times, are unavailable: RL-7; Tu2000 (great if you can find it); Lt-30; N-130.

Though developed specifically for the 30BR capacity & expansion ratio, the Lt30 which came in the original (initial production LOT) jugs, was not the stuff, based upon the prototyping DATA, which we expected.:oops: The bulk-density did/does not accommodate the charge-weights, thus, velocity which we were shown. We were (I was) expecting a bulk-density equal to H-322, featuring the H-4198 burn-rate - my Lt-30, is slightly less dense than my H-4198 - performance (precision) is about equal.

Precision should always trump velocity. Keep 'em ON the X! RG

P.S. I have not chronographed a 30BR barrel for many years - the last time I did, was to compare LV (21") & HV (24") barrels, using the same components - for a pair of ten-shot strings, the Oehler displayed an average difference of 21FPS, or, 7FPS per inch. That was not a cut-off test - there could be that much difference between two barrels of equal length, from the same manufacturer.;)
Tubal 2000 is no longer in production.Are the powders mentioned suitable for heavier bullets (155 range) ?
 
Better call - my e-mail is being INUNDATED with SPAM: tech support cannot tell me why! Literally HUNDREDS every time I check the mail. o_ORG
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,829
Messages
2,204,444
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top