effendude
Gold $$ Contributor
Same response as the last week when this was brought up. There are about 12 million big game hunters in the US. Those hunters spend about 34 billion dollars a year in the economy. Despite how important we as a group (accuracy seekers, competitive shooters or ballistic geeks as a friend calls us) think we are to the shooting industry, Nosler didn't design or market this cartridge for us high volume shooters. Their market is the average hunter, who in all likelihood will never shoot the rifle enough to burn up the barrel. Take a walk through Cabela's or Bass Pro Shops and tell me that every product you see is essential to their respective sport.
I have seen many pre-64 Winchesters in .264 Win Mag still in use by hunters, especially out west. These guys are great hunters, not gun guys, and they only shoot a few shots a year. These rifles are more than 50 years old and still shoot well (enough). Factory ammo will probably cost around $4-6 a round so I doubt the rifles will be shot too frequently.
If I didn't love my 6.5-284's so much, I would build one just for the fun of it and to irk the nay-sayers. Still might as I have a used pre-64 mag action looking for a job. We should be celebrating the fact that we live in a country where we have choices. Let the free market decide whether it makes it or not.
Scott
I have seen many pre-64 Winchesters in .264 Win Mag still in use by hunters, especially out west. These guys are great hunters, not gun guys, and they only shoot a few shots a year. These rifles are more than 50 years old and still shoot well (enough). Factory ammo will probably cost around $4-6 a round so I doubt the rifles will be shot too frequently.
If I didn't love my 6.5-284's so much, I would build one just for the fun of it and to irk the nay-sayers. Still might as I have a used pre-64 mag action looking for a job. We should be celebrating the fact that we live in a country where we have choices. Let the free market decide whether it makes it or not.
Scott