My single digit SD is also with Reloader 15, but in my 1000 yd. Highpower M1A. I have no clue how big or small of a feat that is.The only time I've managed to get single digit SD's has been with Reloder 15.5
Danny
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My single digit SD is also with Reloader 15, but in my 1000 yd. Highpower M1A. I have no clue how big or small of a feat that is.The only time I've managed to get single digit SD's has been with Reloder 15.5
Berger 80.5, LC brass, CCI 41 out of a 20" service rifleAre these numbers produced with 80 or 90 grain bullets?
I'm working up 223/90VLD loads with 15.5 now. It definitely has potential.
BTW, my barrel is 26" and wondering about barrel length used in your test.
This is with the new Reloder 15.5. it's slower burning than 15, but has better temp stability. The 223 tends to be more difficult due to the much smaller case capacity compared to the 308. I still need to do load development on my m14, unfortunately below zero temps aren't conducive to load development.My single digit SD is also with Reloader 15, but in my 1000 yd. Highpower M1A. I have no clue how big or small of a feat that is.
Danny
How far out are you shooting it? With those numbers it's likely you won't see much benefit at the distances 69's are usually shot.I have been working on this for a long time. I’m down to 13.8 SD at this point. The rifle is a stock Remington 700 5R and it shoot good but the 55fps ES still bugs me. I’m using Lapua brass, 24.9 gr of Varget with 69gr SMK at 2950 average MV.
I missed the ".5". I wasn't really aware of that powder till a few days or more ago when reading this forum.This is with the new Reloder 15.5. it's slower burning than 15, but has better temp stability. The 223 tends to be more difficult due to the much smaller case capacity compared to the 308. I still need to do load development on my m14, unfortunately below zero temps aren't conducive to load development.
There is nothing available for RL15.5 and 90 grain bullets so I have been working with three-shot groups and chronograph. The throat in this barrel allows me to load them very long (they don't go below the neck/shoulder juncture) and my normal load has been 24 grains Varget, Lapua brass, CCI400 primer.Berger 80.5, LC brass, CCI 41 out of a 20" service rifle
It's only been out for about 4 months now and hasn't been widely available yet so many people haven't heard of it. The naming doesn't help the confusion either.I missed the ".5". I wasn't really aware of that powder till a few days or more ago when reading this forum.
Danny
I have a varmint match tomorrow out to 400 yards. I will be the new shooter so we will see how I do.How far out are you shooting it? With those numbers it's likely you won't see much benefit at the distances 69's are usually shot.
I'm not familiar with varmint matches so I don't know how big your targets are, but assuming you average velocity is in the middle of your ES your load should be able to hold an elevation spread of roughly 1.2" at 400 yards.I have a varmint match tomorrow out to 400 yards. I will be the new shooter so we will see how I do.
The 85.5 is a hybrid…it does shoot goodInterestingly that 85.5 VLD is a bullet that I and shooting buddies have not been able to achieve comparable accuracy vs other Bergers.
I'd like to see the pistol as well. Curiosity.I recently put together anAR15 pistol in 5.56 NATO. It has a 10.5 inch barrel was meant to shoot close up gongs, just a fun gun. Then my buddy who has a similar pistol pushed to shoot longer distances. So far I’ve hit our 12”x20” silhouette at about 450 yards.
Anyway, back to the topic at hand, we’ve been testing loads with 77 gr SMK and Varget and I had settled on the load/jump combination, and although it wasn’t really very tight, it held ok at distances. As a final step to the testing I decided to do a primer test, which I have never done before.
We test at 50 yards and that is where we zero also.
I had one other load along the way that had low ES and SD and it was with 62 gr Hornady FMJ and TAC. Neither of these two loads shoot really great but they are good enough for now, for what we are doing.
View attachment 1304523
I completely agree but, in my case, I couldn't ignore the wildly fluctuating ES that got as high as 80FPS in one instance. There is much more for me to do before I can be satisfied with the RL15.5 option for my rifle but I will not blame what I see on the powder. Not yet anyway.@rckendall If all you have is three shot groups, don't bother with SD calculations yet.
Three values can be looked at in terms of their ES and Average, but the SD calculation on three samples isn't good for anything.
Can you give us some details on the gun and load components?I am having trouble getting single digit standard deviations in my 223 prone rifles, 5 shot strings.
I can easily do it with my 308's and 243's.
Steve Bair