• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

222 Low-Drag

Actually a hydrostatic test (brass unsupported), 2 or 3(?) firings as fired vs annealed.
Annealed.jpg
Upper part of balloon is indicative of hardness, lower part shows bulge due to wall thickness.
 
Last edited:
Rocket, what does your test tell us? I’m thinkin about where cases typically fail.
No, the failure (body split) wouldn't happen in a chamber.
It's the balloon SHAPE that shows the even stress distribution with a soft/annealed case.
Uneven stress might cause a failure at the annular line you see below the neck.
 
Any new developments on the 222 LD?

Or is OP missing the fingers to update us after his over-pressure round finally caught up to him?

Have done some more testing. Ran into some dismal accuracy results with the 88s that I need to ask y'all about.

Also have been testing the AR-15. No accuracy tests with it, just function testing with heavies. Confirming gas port size.

No, haven't blown anything yet. Just been very busy.
 
I think those charts are part art, part science. Some of the powders are so close together in burn rate that lot to lot variations or slightly different testing protocols will rearrange the list differently when you're looking at adjacent and closely related powders.
Possibly. From my understanding that some of these powders are the same just offered and labels for different companies. ??
 
Dead duck. Noun INFORMAL a person or thing that is defunct or has no chance of success. "they knew their plans were a dead duck"
Sorry I couldn't resist looking up what dead duck meant. No offense or disrespect intended.
Fascinating thread.
Just like duck hunting and the 357 Mag (also SIG) cartridge(s).
 
29 Days without a new post from the OP. I think we can say this wildcat is officially dead.
I've just been real busy. Work, trying to kill pigs before vegetation and ticks get too thick, and a little time with the misses has left no time to check this thread, sorry. Do have a question maybe y'all can help with, when I can get a few mins I will try and ask.
 
I think those charts are part art, part science. Some of the powders are so close together in burn rate that lot to lot variations or slightly different testing protocols will rearrange the list differently when you're looking at adjacent and closely related powders.

And extremely subjective to testing environments too. My thought is it's a relative burn rate chart; so doubtful the reburn all the powders again at chart update.
Good for ballpark checks.

I'd go up and down on the chart near the burn rate area you're checking and select a few to try. Some are cut differently and may allow a Volume fill change. (Ball vs. stick vs. varget vs. cordite...)

-mac
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,756
Messages
2,201,857
Members
79,079
Latest member
mark.urban
Back
Top