Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now THAT would split the difference!Hmmm... Can't decide? How 'bout a 17/204? Mine was featured in the "New For 2015 Varmint Build" thread. Shoots real good and brass is easier to find than 17 Rem. Vic
For those of you that have a 204 can you spot your own shots?
All three of My .204 Rugers have heavy barrels and I use rifle scopes set between 20x and 24x and I can spot my own shots on prairie dogs well beyond 200 yards. I've never shot golf balls, but I think I could spot shots on those at 200 yards as well.
All three of my my .17 Remingtons have heavy barrels as well and they have slightly less recoil than the .204 Ruger, but not by much.
About 2 years ago I purchased a suppressor and use that on my varmint/predator rifles. That adds a little weight to the shooting rig and in my opinion helps to tame down what little recoil the .204s and the .17s have. I also shoot a suppressed Tikka Master Sporter in .22-250 and can spot my hits with that rifle as well.
Like 1raggedhole stated, the 39 gr. Sierra BlitzKing and the 40 gr. V-Max bullets will fight wind deflection because they have a fairly high BC compared to some of the .172 caliber projectiles and might hold a slight advantage over the .172 caliber bullets when it comes to wind deflection. However, there might be one or two .172 caliber bullets that have pretty high BCs as well--the 30 gr. Kindler Gold comes to mind.
I'm just glad I don't have to chose between the .204 Ruger and the .17 Remington. You can't go wrong with either caliber, but if wind is your enemy, you might want to go with the .204 Ruger.
I also have a .17 Tactical and I could spot shots with that caliber as well. However, I went from a Remington Varmint contour barrel to a new #4 contour Pac-Nor and haven't got it back from my gunsmith yet, but that barrel is not nearly has heavy as the Remington Varmint contour barrel, but I will have a suppressor hanging off the muzzle so that should help tame down the muzzle jump.
17-223 is my choice. 223 brass is everywhere and cheap. 204 brass is not something i have ever found at the public range. difference in ballistics from 17-223 to 17-204 is minimal.
Yes! Hits are no problem to see with 204 Ruger, but brass is expensive and hard to find. The 20 practical is a better choice. Simply neck down cheap LC brass and you get basically the same performance.And nobody mentioned the 20 Practical.
As a big fan of .17 calibers, I'm telling you that the 204 Ruger is the ballistically superior round.