Murray Brook
Silver $$ Contributor
Clean patches don't mean much. A borescope lets you know what your bore is really like.
I use a Teslong bore scopeIs it the Eliminator, C4, the brushing, or the dry patching that's cleaning your bore?
And do you use a bore scope, or just quit when the dry patches are clean?
+1 on getting a few wet patches down the bore right after the range being EXTREMELY effective. Getting some bore solvent in the bore immediately after shooting, and letting it sit overnight, really does wonders in softening carbon fouling and making it much easier to remove long-term. It doesn't have to be a fancy solvent, with Hoppes #9 working fine.If you clean immediately after shooting at the range while the barrel is warm, it helps with carbon removal. Cleaning between relays also helps to keep the carbon buildup in check.
Quality bronze brushes! I like Pro Shot brushes. The only thing I use nylon for is brushing case necks now. Even the primo, stiffer, nylon brushes are inferior to bronze brushes IN MY EXPERIENCES.
Cleaned a barrel with Iosso nylon and C4 over a 24hr period, wet patch roughly every 4hrs after initial patching and brushing until bed time. Brushed again the next morning, according to the patches, the carbon was gone. Bore scope said otherwise. Cleaned again, but with bronze brush and the patches were filthy. This was with a BR gun with a Kreiger barrel with less than 50 shots on the barrel.
I can’t duplicate other people’s claims and results when it comes to nylon brushes and cleaning products. Why, I don’t know!
Since getting a bore scope I have become so cynical of the gun cleaning product market.
Fellow local BR competitor and I have had numerous conversations about cleaning. Best barrel he ever had, a barrel that continuously shot 250, high X count scores. Only thing that barrel ever saw were bronze brushes and Wipeout cleaner, and a VERY INFREQUENT cleaning with abrasive for a few strokes when the gun didn’t score to expectations. He never had a bore scope and said that barrel probably looked awful if a scope had been ran down it, but it shot lights out. Moral of the story, let the barrel and scores tell you what it needs.
If the accuracy is holding just keep going. I always have this thought (dangerous). Pre borescopes most of us probably were leaving some carbon in the barrel. Was this relatively thin layer of carbon actually helping to protect the barrel from heat and wear? Now the commercial powers that be would never consider this I am sure, there is money involved you know. It just seems as we have went to perhaps excessive cleaning. Excessive in most thing in life is not usually the best. I wonder.I’m nervous about metal brushes through my barrels, so I try to stay ahead of bad carbon build up by cleaning after each range session ( usually 20-30 rounds per session ). I use C4 after each session, patches come out black, progressively less so. If I allow the C4 to sit for a while, it will come out green from picking up some copper as well. Finish up with a couple of Clenzoil patches followed by a dry patch. Every second or third cleaning I give the barrels a Kroil penetrating oil soak as well and a light ( 20 strokes ) application of JB bore cleaning compound after every 300 rounds or so. Haven’t bore scoped the barrels, probably should, but wouldn’t know what the hell I was looking at anyway!
I’m nervous about metal brushes through my barrels, so I try to stay ahead of bad carbon build up by cleaning after each range session ( usually 20-30 rounds per session ). I use C4 after each session, patches come out black, progressively less so. If I allow the C4 to sit for a while, it will come out green from picking up some copper as well. Finish up with a couple of Clenzoil patches followed by a dry patch. Every second or third cleaning I give the barrels a Kroil penetrating oil soak as well and a light ( 20 strokes ) application of JB bore cleaning compound after every 300 rounds or so. Haven’t bore scoped the barrels, probably should, but wouldn’t know what the hell I was looking at anyway!
Through 1700 round, I can’t see any diminished accuracy with my Savage Model 12 LRPV in .223. Of course, that’s not a lot of rounds for a .223. Maybe if I waited 100 + rounds or so before running ANYTHING through my barrels, or waiting until “ the rifle tells me it needs to be cleaned”, I might have some carbon related issues? I don’t know.If the accuracy is holding just keep going. I always have this thought (dangerous). Pre borescopes most of us probably were leaving some carbon in the barrel. Was this relatively thin layer of carbon actually helping to protect the barrel from heat and wear? Now the commercial powers that be would never consider this I am sure, there is money involved you know. It just seems as we have went to perhaps excessive cleaning. Excessive in most thing in life is not usually the best. I wonder.
A buddy who has ascended to the Benchrest Hall of Fame advised me to do just what you describe. He uses Otis foaming cleaner before bagging his rifle because 1) it's cheap, and 2) you don't need a rod and patches. Just squirt some into the bore from the action end until it oozes out the muzzle and there you go.+1 on getting a few wet patches down the bore right after the range being EXTREMELY effective. Getting some bore solvent in the bore immediately after shooting, and letting it sit overnight, really does wonders in softening carbon fouling and making it much easier to remove long-term. It doesn't have to be a fancy solvent, with Hoppes #9 working fine.
Your cleaning process, with the exception of not using bronze brushes, is the same that I was told by a former Marine office who was responsible for all the Marine marksmanship teams in the days long before borescopes. Your regular use of JB is probably helping to avoid degradation of accuracy. Cleaning after 20-30 rounds isn't hurting either.Through 1700 round, I can’t see any diminished accuracy with my Savage Model 12 LRPV in .223. Of course, that’s not a lot of rounds for a .223. Maybe if I waited 100 + rounds or so before running ANYTHING through my barrels, or waiting until “ the rifle tells me it needs to be cleaned”, I might have some carbon related issues? I don’t know.
If the accuracy is holding just keep going. I always have this thought (dangerous). Pre borescopes most of us probably were leaving some carbon in the barrel. Was this relatively thin layer of carbon actually helping to protect the barrel from heat and wear? Now the commercial powers that be would never consider this I am sure, there is money involved you know. It just seems as we have went to perhaps excessive cleaning. Excessive in most thing in life is not usually the best. I wonder.
Yeah, I’m probably being overly cautious.Your cleaning process, with the exception of not using bronze brushes, is the same that I was told by a former Marine office who was responsible for all the Marine marksmanship teams in the days long before borescopes. Your regular use of JB is probably helping to avoid degradation of accuracy. Cleaning after 20-30 rounds isn't hurting either.
Several people have done experiments with bronze brushes on stainless with no measurable effect.
Well, could be soot, but since soot is composed of carbon, it can’t hurt to remove it and not allow to accumulate (? ). I would think that it would eventually harden.I'm 200% with JEFFPPC on this. If your rifle is shooting well, leave it alone. I think most of the black you see on patches is soot. Don't be afraid to put a brush down the barrel. Do you know how hard it would be to abrade a stainless or moly barrel with a nylon or bronze brush? Think of it as maybe burnishing the inside of the barrel.
Like every post I've ever made, the shot on target will tell the tale.
It will.it would eventually harden.
No solvent?Going though your elaborate cleaning process while wearing a blindfold is pointless !! First get a bore scope (teslong), some no harm Dewey bronze brushes and toss everything but the JB !
I believe Tesoro’s point was that no known liquid solvents will remove hard carbon from the throat forward 4-6 inches where it accumulates and then hardens to a diamond-like black glaze. At that point an abrasive will be necessary to remove that glazed carbon.No solvent?
Nope. My bud is part of the origina PacNor crowd and I follow what they found out testing/experimenting back in the day, in cahoots with other barrel makers over on the other side all trying to figure out the most sensible way to bring a barrel back to 'clean' for repeated accuracy. Conclusion was to use an abrasive that breaks down on use like JB so it dosent create galling. Copper and carbon disappear. But they (and I) put the rifles away hot and clean them later when cold. I am sure there are other processes as mentioned but this method works according to my borescope, and every time I start a new session my barrel condition is the same as when I started the prior session, throat erosion excluded,, and simply compensated for if it occurred, during the reloading process.No solvent?
Thanks for sharing this information. I didn't Know.Witches Brew is one of if not THE most aggressive abrasives marketed for rifle cleaning. In case you didn’t know.