For normal cleaning the brush is passed back and forth through the length of the barrel, and the brush is sized to the groove diameter of the barrel, not the chamber neck diameter. By going up a caliber in brush size and using a twisting motion while the brush is in the part you want to clean, you can get some benefit from the brush for removing a carbon ring at the end of the case neck part of the chamber. If your rod guide will let the larger brush pass, you can use it, but it is really not needed because the rod never gets into the throat for this operation. What you want is a rod that is of a convenient length that has a handle that is fixed to the rod rather than having bearings. There have been plenty of posts about what sort of cleaning liquids or abrasives different shooters prefer. Do you own a bore scope?So, if cleaning with a properly fitting bore guide while cleaning the barrel, how does the carbon ring get touched? I assume this must be a separate step in the cleaning process without a bore guide.?
Relatively new to this compared to some, and this has always puzzled me.
This is the kind of evidence (before and after) performance results that is meaningful, at least to me. Thanks for posting.Before I joined this site, I knew nothing about, and never heard of a carbon ring. I just used #9 until patches came out clean and called it good. I have 2 high quality hunting rifles that always shot bugholes, then after a few years both started shooting worse and worse until I just quit using them. I even took one to a
"gunsmith" who said he couldn't find anything wrong.
As I started to read more and more posts about a carbon ring, it finally clicked that it might be my issue. I bought a Teslong borescope and some IOSSO and really got after it. Since the carbon had been in there so long it took a long time scrubbing, but I finally got them clean. Took both rifles to range after and accuracy was restored.
I find it hard to believe that the carbon ring thing is so unknown in the "average" shooting world. I think a lot of barrels have been replaced that simply needed a good scrubbing with some sort of abrasive.
As for Thorroclean, I don't see anything from the mfr. that states it's an abrasive? Maybe it is, but I can't find anything except internet conjecture that states that. All I know is that it REALLY works!
In my experience, if a bore cleaning product “works” by removing that hard carbon from throat forward 6” then it is most likely an abrasive bore cleaning product. I say this because I know of no liquid solvent that will remove that hard glazed carbon build-up. Brushing a lot…and I mean a lot with something like Free All may put a a dent in the hard carbon but you will be in the 100’s of brushing cycles to notice a difference. Why not just judiciously remove that crap the most efficient way and that is with an abrasive bore product such as Iosso, Thorroclean (which I believe to be a liquid type of Iosso), Flitz Bore Cleaner, JB (the gray JB with blue cap), KG2, Montana Extreme Copper Cream, or in extreme neglected cases - Holland’s Witches Brew. I prefer Iosso or Thorroclean using Iosso Blue Nylon brushes according to Iosso’s instructions. That never fails me in rather quickly removing all traces of any fouling. It really is a simple and effective solution without aimlessly hoping for and trying all sorts of liquid solvents that are not going to cut it.Before I joined this site, I knew nothing about, and never heard of a carbon ring. I just used #9 until patches came out clean and called it good. I have 2 high quality hunting rifles that always shot bugholes, then after a few years both started shooting worse and worse until I just quit using them. I even took one to a
"gunsmith" who said he couldn't find anything wrong.
As I started to read more and more posts about a carbon ring, it finally clicked that it might be my issue. I bought a Teslong borescope and some IOSSO and really got after it. Since the carbon had been in there so long it took a long time scrubbing, but I finally got them clean. Took both rifles to range after and accuracy was restored.
I find it hard to believe that the carbon ring thing is so unknown in the "average" shooting world. I think a lot of barrels have been replaced that simply needed a good scrubbing with some sort of abrasive.
As for Thorroclean, I don't see anything from the mfr. that states it's an abrasive? Maybe it is, but I can't find anything except internet conjecture that states that. All I know is that it REALLY works!
Could you elaborate on this a little. TKSI use a carbon arrow shaft to break up the carbon ring.
Yes, please explainI use a carbon arrow shaft to break up the carbon ring.
I use a old arrow that I cut the broad head insert off, sand the shaft until it fits snug in the neck of the chamber, I used to use Rem 40x on the shaft but now I use a small amount of Thorroclean, insert shaft into chamber neck and work it back and forth and spin it around in the neck. This will break up most of the carbon if it’s not too hard but as previously mentioned you have to stay on top of the carbon ring and not let it get out of hand.Could you elaborate on this a little. TKS
People who have not competed in short range groups matches lack the experience to understand fully why those that do clean differently than they do. If the match has a single relay, a shooter may only have 30 minutes to attend to loading the ammunition for his next match and getting his barrel clean enough to shoot sub .2 groups if the conditions allow. This situation is unique to this sport. In competition barrels are consumables. As someone once said to me, that is why they have threads. If one is not operating under these constraints, then a different approach may be used.You will not damage a barrel with a brush.
Forum Boss: I generally concur, if the person is using a proper bore guide and is not overly aggressive. However, I have inspected multiple barrels showing damage to the edge of the crown caused by sawing back and forth with bronze brushes. I know that many successful short-range shooters brush very aggressively, but some of those guys also regularly re-crown their barrels or toss them after 800 rounds.
Unless there is an extreme time constraint I recommend using a bronze brush in one direction, then removing it after it exits the barrel, and cleaning it with solvent, then putting it back on the rod and entering from the chamber end. That said, there are some barrels and types of fouling where back and forth movement in the throat area might be required. But I think most people, with custom barrels, will benefit by being conservative, if they clean before the carbon hardens.
What powder are you using and how often do you clean?If your brass necks are way short for the chambering you will get a wider carbon ring . I have a gun that has the chamber neck cut .040 longer than spec and brass that is .007 shorter then specks , and that makes the chamber .047 gap between the brass and the chamber neck . Mine is a 222 so I made 222 brass out of Lapua 223 brass for a .007 gap and check my brass after every firing . So far after 400 firings not of a carbon ring with normal cleaning .
This is exactly my process as well.An over-sized Iosso bore brush coated with C-4 on a short cleaning rod spinning in that area will do wonders. Try 20 revolutions and check it. May take more. If the C-4 fails Iosso on the brush is the next step.

Might be the #1 or #2 reason I could never get into SR Benchrest!I think the main reason that those of us in Short Range Benchrest do not worry about the carbon ring is we clean after every group on a regular basis.
I'm using vv130 with light pass with 3 patches every 10 rounds . And a good cleaning before I leave the range .What powder are you using and how often do you clean?
