No they are not!...simple answer, are they all the rage now?
And I am sure not everyone liked them..
Thus my question"
No they are not!...simple answer, are they all the rage now?
Actually I have been thinking of going back to testing it. Its a shame that I haven't because I felt good about the barrel.Great info..
Thanks for sharing!..
Would you back to testing? Or will you drop it
Let me ask in a different direction...Actually I have been thinking of going back to testing it. Its a shame that I haven't because I felt good about the barrel.
Todd
Certainly not “all the rage”simple answer, are they all the rage now?
Yes I agree".The "internet says" in summary: polygonal barrels have longer barrel life, less accuracy, and easier to clean than conventional rifled barrels.
I don't compete,..but I do like accuracy and consistency..I have a BHW 24" 3 groove polygonal barrel on a AR15 chambered in 6x45
Accuracy is great, clean up is a breeze.
Would I put 1 on a competition rifle?
Couldn't say for sure
Hope this helps
I don't make the stocks, I just make them pretty.I don't compete,..but I do like accuracy and consistency..
Thanks for posting. I see you make wonderful stock's.
May give you call sometime and chew the fat for a while..
I would love a good hand made stock for this build.
I say my ratchet cleaned easier than the Kreiger on my previous upper.I can not prove nor disprove they clean clean easier, just know it they shot for two of us if that helped
Very nice...I have a LW in 30-284. I'm happy with it. It's a hunting rig on a 700 SA.
As others have mentioned here, not all polygons are the same.Sorry to beat an old horse".
I would like to know personal opinion from actual users of polygonal barrels.
It seemed that it was a rave 10 years or so.
Let me know your thoughts.
Your experiences.
Is it beneficial?.
I am in the search for a new barrel, and would like to try something different.
Thanks in advance.
Hugo
This is real experience information.As others have mentioned here, not all polygons are the same.
Some "ratchet" just means the lands are slanted on one side, but edges are still sharp.
The only true polygon I've owned is BHW's "Caudle". I have Pac-Nors that look to have rounded edges through a bore scope. I consider both of these true polygon, and both will shoot sub. 0.25 moa, better than I can shoot.
There are three other advantages of true polygons that have not been mentioned. The smoother land edges create a better gas seal, which accounts for their higher velocity. There is also less bullet jacket deformation, as they don't "engrave" the jacket like standard rifling. And lastly, they create less friction, reducing both barrel and jacket heating.
Having experienced the many advantages first hand, I personally would never buy anything other than polygon. FYI, Pac Nor said 90% of their sales are polygon.