VA_XTC_Shooter
Silver $$ Contributor
i ha e a question specifically about AR15 headspace.
SAAMI 223 and all 223 variant headspace measurements I have seen for GO are 1.4636"
In the TDP for the M16, the 556 NATO GO is 1.4646" it is my understanding the TDP calls for the extra 0.001" headspace to increase reliability.
Additionally, Colt claims (in their armorer's classes) as a weapon is fired at a high rate, the headspace of the chamber shrinks a little axially, thus the need for the 0.001" extra length. How much firing, I am not sure. Could be only attributed to full auto, not sure.
Can anyone verify this, elaborate, explain?
Criterion has stated their 556 NATO barrels are chambered to the 1.4646" GO headspace and that the 223 Wylde is also chambered to this headspace.
I don't see anything inherently "wrong" with chambering to the 1.4646" vs 1.4636" headspace, but don't see a real reason to reject a barrel chambered to 1.4636"
I am curious of your opinions on this?
SAAMI 223 and all 223 variant headspace measurements I have seen for GO are 1.4636"
In the TDP for the M16, the 556 NATO GO is 1.4646" it is my understanding the TDP calls for the extra 0.001" headspace to increase reliability.
Additionally, Colt claims (in their armorer's classes) as a weapon is fired at a high rate, the headspace of the chamber shrinks a little axially, thus the need for the 0.001" extra length. How much firing, I am not sure. Could be only attributed to full auto, not sure.
Can anyone verify this, elaborate, explain?
Criterion has stated their 556 NATO barrels are chambered to the 1.4646" GO headspace and that the 223 Wylde is also chambered to this headspace.
I don't see anything inherently "wrong" with chambering to the 1.4646" vs 1.4636" headspace, but don't see a real reason to reject a barrel chambered to 1.4636"
I am curious of your opinions on this?
Last edited: