Should be fine, just drop the powder a little and shoot a handful of them. Will prolly change point of impact but that is fixable.
How much did you reduce your loads to avoid the pressure signs.Thanks in advanceI use 400’s in my 223 and 223AI loads. They will show firing pin craters before other brands, they’re thinner. Watch for other pressure signs, ejector, extractor marks or heavy bolt lift when adjusting loads with these primers. I have found that the SD’s are some of the lowest with these primers. YMMV.
Could you expand on your conclusion as to, why the switch?Switching to cci 400 primers in .223 from winchester other than dropping the powder charge is there any other precautions I should take. The loads I use are below max with benchmark powder.
Cratered primers, flat primers, pierced primers, soot around the primer edge, heavy bolt lift, extractor and ejector marks on the case head are all signs of pressure. I load moderately for accuracy, usually finding a load in the mid range of powder recommendations. Punishing the case, rifle and myself with excess load charges doesn’t make sense to me.How much did you reduce your loads to avoid the pressure signs.Thanks in advance
Ran out of winchester primers have a ton of ci 400 that I bought years ago.Could you expand on your conclusion as to, why the switch?
My accuracy load with the winchesters was 26.0 grains of benchmark I have reduced the load to 25.0 for testing but have not fired them yet.The problem may be compounded by the fact I"m shooting them in a Savage model 10 that showed minor cratering with the win.I blamed an ill fitting firing pin for that cratering in the absence of any other pressure signs.Thanks for the info.Cratered primers, flat primers, pierced primers, soot around the primer edge, heavy bolt lift, extractor and ejector marks on the case head are all signs of pressure. I load moderately for accuracy, usually finding a load in the mid range of powder recommendations. Punishing the case, rifle and myself with excess load charges doesn’t make sense to me.
A CCI400 primer may crater, not due to pressure, but the thinness of the primer cup. Now, add another pressure sign and you’ll need to reevaluate your charge.
With all that being said, the prudent path upon changing any component of a load is to always reduce your load to a manual starting charge and work it back up.
You’ll probably find that CCI400’s may crater without any other pressure signs with a less then max load.
Max load is 26.5 grns of benchmark my go to load was 26.0grn I'm not sure whether the win primers were plated or not but they showed very little cratering when fired in my savage.Thanks for the responseIf you have been running the "newer" non plated Win primers and are not loading near max you will be fine. But it never hurts to drop back a half grain and work back up. Bet it will end right where you were at!
Frank
They were intended for lower pressure cartridges like 22 hornet.Are CCI400s just known to be thin, or did they have a bad run of them for awhile? I thought I read that somewhere too. The reason I ask is I used them and other primers in several 223-based chamberings with no issues. Reloaded a bunch of 223AI and 20 Practical rounds recently with the same box of CCI400s, bought several years ago, and got pierced centers on both. With loads that had shown only moderate pressure signs previously.
I'll definitely look into that I hope his contact info on this site is current.Savage bolts can really benefit big from Grimstod working them over. He'll bush them and do a lift kit at the same time if wanted.
I'll try reduced loads and see how it goes I'am not going to get anyThey were intended for lower pressure cartridges like 22 hornet.
Personally I like #400 but they don’t tolerate spicy pressures or sloppy firing pin/bolt face well.