• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

cci 400 primers

I use 400’s in my 223 and 223AI loads. They will show firing pin craters before other brands, they’re thinner. Watch for other pressure signs, ejector, extractor marks or heavy bolt lift when adjusting loads with these primers. I have found that the SD’s are some of the lowest with these primers. YMMV.
 
I use 400’s in my 223 and 223AI loads. They will show firing pin craters before other brands, they’re thinner. Watch for other pressure signs, ejector, extractor marks or heavy bolt lift when adjusting loads with these primers. I have found that the SD’s are some of the lowest with these primers. YMMV.
How much did you reduce your loads to avoid the pressure signs.Thanks in advance
 
How much did you reduce your loads to avoid the pressure signs.Thanks in advance
Cratered primers, flat primers, pierced primers, soot around the primer edge, heavy bolt lift, extractor and ejector marks on the case head are all signs of pressure. I load moderately for accuracy, usually finding a load in the mid range of powder recommendations. Punishing the case, rifle and myself with excess load charges doesn’t make sense to me.
A CCI400 primer may crater, not due to pressure, but the thinness of the primer cup. Now, add another pressure sign and you’ll need to reevaluate your charge.
With all that being said, the prudent path upon changing any component of a load is to always reduce your load to a manual starting charge and work it back up.
You’ll probably find that CCI400’s may crater without any other pressure signs with a less then max load.
 
Primer flow and flattening aren't the best tea leaves to read unless you know your existing primer cups' behavior well.

Chrono results and swipes are no doubt indications of high pressure. I agree with dropping a half grain for a test run.
 
Cratered primers, flat primers, pierced primers, soot around the primer edge, heavy bolt lift, extractor and ejector marks on the case head are all signs of pressure. I load moderately for accuracy, usually finding a load in the mid range of powder recommendations. Punishing the case, rifle and myself with excess load charges doesn’t make sense to me.
A CCI400 primer may crater, not due to pressure, but the thinness of the primer cup. Now, add another pressure sign and you’ll need to reevaluate your charge.
With all that being said, the prudent path upon changing any component of a load is to always reduce your load to a manual starting charge and work it back up.
You’ll probably find that CCI400’s may crater without any other pressure signs with a less then max load.
My accuracy load with the winchesters was 26.0 grains of benchmark I have reduced the load to 25.0 for testing but have not fired them yet.The problem may be compounded by the fact I"m shooting them in a Savage model 10 that showed minor cratering with the win.I blamed an ill fitting firing pin for that cratering in the absence of any other pressure signs.Thanks for the info.
 
If you have been running the "newer" non plated Win primers and are not loading near max you will be fine. But it never hurts to drop back a half grain and work back up. Bet it will end right where you were at!

Frank
Max load is 26.5 grns of benchmark my go to load was 26.0grn I'm not sure whether the win primers were plated or not but they showed very little cratering when fired in my savage.Thanks for the response
 
Are CCI400s just known to be thin, or did they have a bad run of them for awhile? I thought I read that somewhere too. The reason I ask is I used them and other primers in several 223-based chamberings with no issues. Reloaded a bunch of 223AI and 20 Practical rounds recently with the same box of CCI400s, bought several years ago, and got pierced centers on both. With loads that had shown only moderate pressure signs previously.
 
Anyone have one of those charts listing "Primer Brisance" of our common primers?

OR --- any truth to the claim that CCI 550's are identical to CCI 400"s?? jd
 
Are CCI400s just known to be thin, or did they have a bad run of them for awhile? I thought I read that somewhere too. The reason I ask is I used them and other primers in several 223-based chamberings with no issues. Reloaded a bunch of 223AI and 20 Practical rounds recently with the same box of CCI400s, bought several years ago, and got pierced centers on both. With loads that had shown only moderate pressure signs previously.
They were intended for lower pressure cartridges like 22 hornet.

Personally I like #400 but they don’t tolerate spicy pressures or sloppy firing pin/bolt face well.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,786
Messages
2,203,359
Members
79,110
Latest member
miles813
Back
Top