The CMP is a federally (Congressionally) chartered program with an emphasis on youth safety education and marksmanship. While it is specifically not a department or agency of the United States, it works with them, as does the follow on Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice & Firearms Safety.
As to F-Class, the language below may indicate why disciplines like it and benchrest and such have not been more actively pursued by the CMP.
From its legislative charter:
In addition to this, the CMP is a Congressionally designated repository for the distribution of military surplus weapons to civilians.
When we consider the two points taken together, 1) that CMP’s match programs would literally be prescribed or at least approved by the Army, along with 2) the Army’s surplus weapons residing with the CMP, then it is not surprising that the CMP isn’t enthusiastic about F-Class.
Ours is the height of military non-uniformity. We are all privateers making and using our one-off rifles with a barrage of aids and accoutrements that I cannot envision the Secretary of the Army either appreciating or embracing. Who wants to take the lead in explaining how an F-Open front rest promotes individual marksmanship to the Army, and asking the Army to bless “this one” but prohibit that one, its bag is too small or too hard? Our entire discipline could be said to be one giant “workaround” on the Army’s notion of traditional marksmanship.
As to F-Class, the language below may indicate why disciplines like it and benchrest and such have not been more actively pursued by the CMP.
From its legislative charter:
40725. National Matches and small-arms firing school
(a) Annual Competition.—An annual competition called the "National Matches" and consisting of rifle and pistol matches for a national trophy, medals, and other prizes shall be held as prescribed by the Secretary of the Army.In addition to this, the CMP is a Congressionally designated repository for the distribution of military surplus weapons to civilians.
When we consider the two points taken together, 1) that CMP’s match programs would literally be prescribed or at least approved by the Army, along with 2) the Army’s surplus weapons residing with the CMP, then it is not surprising that the CMP isn’t enthusiastic about F-Class.
Ours is the height of military non-uniformity. We are all privateers making and using our one-off rifles with a barrage of aids and accoutrements that I cannot envision the Secretary of the Army either appreciating or embracing. Who wants to take the lead in explaining how an F-Open front rest promotes individual marksmanship to the Army, and asking the Army to bless “this one” but prohibit that one, its bag is too small or too hard? Our entire discipline could be said to be one giant “workaround” on the Army’s notion of traditional marksmanship.
Last edited: