• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

REVIEW ARKEN OPTICS 4-14x44 MIL FFP NEW TO MARKET

AthlonOpticsGuy

Silver $$ Contributor
Hello Horde,

Its always fun playing with new toys, and the new line from Arken did not disappoint.
Here is one mans view on what I saw out of the Arken SH-4 4-14x44 FFP 30mm Optic, initially shared over on Snipers Hide..

1. Initial first impressions: The Arken 4-14x44 comes in what I would consider a standard box in line with what you would see from any reputable optics company. Well packaged, and an added bonus I was unaware of is that the optic comes with a Sunshade ( nice!). Feel and finish wise it is your standard 6061-T6 matte black finish. I talked to the guys at Arken and they told me that the final version will have a look similar to what the razor HD has currently color wise. I am excited to see what that looks like!

Rating: 8.5 out of 10

2. Glass: Probably up there with the most important feature when I look at an Optic, Arken touts its Lanthanum Multi Coated glass as " providing better optical performance than similar products" ( took quote verbatim that right from the box). Now I don't know a whole a lot about Lanthanum glass, but I do trust my eyes to pick out good glass when I see it. So, I mounted this SOB onto my 6.5 Grendel and had some fun. First test was a basic test out in the arid desert near my house during mid day shooting hours. I wanted to see what the optic garner clarity wise out in the field. To my surprise, the glass was as advertised. The edge to edge clarity was as good as many optics I have seen costing twice this much, including the vortex viper gen 2, and the Midas/Ares line from Athlon ( more on that shortly). Good first pass... but I wasn't done!

I have a Midas TAC ( HD glass, comparable to a Nikon FX1000, PST GEN 2) and wanted to line these up at dusk to see what the low light level gathering was like. I felt like this was a good comparison as the Midas Tac has a similar setup ( 4-16x44, 30 mm tube). Side by side I focused on the same cactus at 500 yards later that evening... Here is what I saw:

15 minutes til sunset: No real difference in the clarity or light gathering, and not shocking, as light was still very available

Sunset: Oddly enough, expecting to see some difference, as I am get impressed with the Midas tac, the clarity of the object in focus and the amount of light both scopes produced was virtually identical.

10 minutes past sunset: With light almost gone, I rotated looking through both scopes back and forth for a good five minutes, and they both provided the same amount of clarity and light as the other. Now this is to say they are not on par with a S and B or other high end optic, but I expected the Midas to give me more since it retails for $590.. This left me intrigued.

3. Eyebox: In a phrase, very comfortable. Even at full zoom I did not have to fidget a whole lot to line up my target comfortably and fire away. The only downside I see for now is that Arken only has one reticle and one increment choice ( mil). For me this is not a big deal, but for some it may be a deal breaker. That being said, Arken tells me there are other scope configurations in the works, and I am excited to see what those look like. the SHR MIL reticle is simple to use, and I really enjoyed it, as I am not a huge fan of the Xmas tree style reticles that have become so popular.

Rating: 8.5 out of 10

4. Turrets: Arken touts itself as having a "turret tracking guarantee". I inquired a bit more about this, and the fellas over there tell me that the turrets will track to a 99% degree of accuracy. Now I did a simple box test, as well as some range time dialing from 100, to 300, and 500 yards respectively, and the scope performed just fine. Also I will add that the turrets are very tactile and crisp.

Rating: 8.5 out of 10

5. Price: If you are like me, you are always looking for a good deal on an optic that will perform without having to sacrifice your child's college fund. The $349.99 price point Arken offers is what had me intrigued. I was skeptical that the quality of the optic and available features would actually stack up to other optics in the same general price range. To my dismay, it performed neck and neck with my Midas Tac, and having spent plenty of time behind mid tier optics ( $600-$1000 price range) from Burris, Leopold, Sig, Vortex, among others, I truly believe that this scope will hold its own against any of them. Compared to optics in the same sub $400 price point? There isn't anything I have looked through that I would purchase other than this. I know, sounds crazy right? To my eyes, this is my stance.

Rating: 9.5

Summary: All in all, the Arken SH-4 exceeded my expectations in every category. For $349.99, I have yet to see an optic with this kind of clarity, eye box, turret crispness, and overall quality in this price point. Is it a S and B or Nightforce? No.. But they aren't trying to be either. I will be using more of these in my line up with out any doubt.

To learn more about Arken Optics go to there website:

https://www.arkenopticsusa.com





Thanks for your Time AOG
 
A58B9D4D-61B3-425D-972A-E10B6CA5EDCD.jpegI after ordering a SH 4-16 gen II MRAD, with a lead time of 8-12 wk. I was lucky enough to find someone locally selling there (never mounted) SH 4-14 gen I MRAD; at the time, the idea was to sell the gen I once the new gen II arrived. After mounting, zeroing, and going on a deer hunt with the gen I, I will definitely be keeping the gen I.
The gen I looks and feels fantastic. While the magnification ring may be a little stiff to some, for me, it's nothing to get upset about. The optics tracks just as advertised and gives a noticeable tactile response.
While I don't have glass time behind pricier optics, I will say that my friends that have looked through the SH4 4-14, all were very impressed with the clarity of the optic even and full magnification.
In a two-day period I hiked roughly 20 miles with the gen I mounted. While it isn't consider a lightweight optic for hunting, the weight does inspire confidence in it's durability. The conditions were cold and we were occasionally hit with sprinkles but there was no sign of fogging. I only saw two whitetails, spikes, the Gen I performed beautifully.
If ever I come across another gen I, I will not hesitate to buy.
Great Optic.
 
View attachment 1241132I after ordering a SH 4-16 gen II MRAD, with a lead time of 8-12 wk. I was lucky enough to find someone locally selling there (never mounted) SH 4-14 gen I MRAD; at the time, the idea was to sell the gen I once the new gen II arrived. After mounting, zeroing, and going on a deer hunt with the gen I, I will definitely be keeping the gen I.
The gen I looks and feels fantastic. While the magnification ring may be a little stiff to some, for me, it's nothing to get upset about. The optics tracks just as advertised and gives a noticeable tactile response.
While I don't have glass time behind pricier optics, I will say that my friends that have looked through the SH4 4-14, all were very impressed with the clarity of the optic even and full magnification.
In a two-day period I hiked roughly 20 miles with the gen I mounted. While it isn't consider a lightweight optic for hunting, the weight does inspire confidence in it's durability. The conditions were cold and we were occasionally hit with sprinkles but there was no sign of fogging. I only saw two whitetails, spikes, the Gen I performed beautifully.
If ever I come across another gen I, I will not hesitate to buy.
Great Optic.
Awesome glad you are liking it!
 
I keep going to Arken's website and looking, and I am often tempted to buy and even wait, until I look at the weight of their product. It's just too heavy for my needs or wants.
 
I know what you mean about weight. But I spent 6 months in the Gym and now I'm in good enough shape to handle the scope.
I think I know what you mean. I'm almost 67 and in the spring I'll have to handle 20 tons of 50lb fertilizer bags by myself. Maybe I look at Arken when I get finished with planting and side dressing.

Actually, I looked at the Arken 5-25 and it comes in at 40 oz. I didn't see the new lightweight 4-16that looks pretty good at 24 oz.
 
I have one of the new lighter ones that should deliver soon. Couldn’t help myself, I’m curious. They were selling some of their older models at 299.99, I don’t know if they still are but that’s cheap for what they give you.
 
Last edited:
I didn't like the eyebox on the SH4s. I shot two of them and would gladly pay more for a scope with more forgiving eyebox. The EP 5 is supposed to have better eyebox.
 
I didn't like the eyebox on the SH4s. I shot two of them and would gladly pay more for a scope with more forgiving eyebox. The EP 5 is supposed to have better eyebox.
I transitioned from Leupold LRP 8.5 X 25 X 50 to the Arken EP-5 5 X 25 X 56 back a few months ago on all my rifles. I don't see a whole lot of difference in the eyebox between the two. As far as quality goes the Arken in my opinion is as good or better in comparisons than Leupold. I own 7 of the EP-5.
 
I'm just a dumb longrange steel ringer and don't claim to know anything but reading the comments about tight or loose eye box on scopes got me thinking. For our longrange rimfire matches I started with SWFA because they had what I needed but it had what most would call a very tight eyebox.

Been switching over to Arkens and have quite a few due to being quite a bit improved over the SWFA line. I don't find their eyebox being a problem at all. Most people that have problems initially are used to very forgiving hunting type scopes.

Now to the part that got me thinking over the various comments. If you mount and position your scope perfect to your positioning on each gun and you have problems with a "tight" eyebox and having to adjust or struggle then you're not doing the exact same thing positioning yourself behind the gun each time.

I'm sure everyone on here knows you should be able to close your eyes, get behind the gun as if you're ready to squeeze the trigger. Then open your eyes and be perfectly aligned and see a full perfect view thru the scope. If not, then it isn't right or you need to tweak your skills to be more consistent.

Tight or loose eyebox, doesn't matter to me. All I see is a full reticle with no shadows. Gives me one less thing to worry about when preparing the shot.

Topstrap
 
Last edited:

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,452
Messages
2,196,087
Members
78,922
Latest member
6.5fool
Back
Top