Can't be me! I'm not bald or skinny! And I have a nose!
Can't be me! I'm not bald or skinny! And I have a nose!
Manufacturers issue warnings for a reason. How many times must they do so?I wonder how many more times I'll have to provide these links!!!???
![]()
5.56 vs .223 - What You Know May Be Wrong - LuckyGunner.com Labs
Andrew of Lucky Gunner Labs explores the differences between .223 Remington and 5.56mm NATO ammunition - and the results may surprise you!www.luckygunner.com
223 -vs- 5.56: FACTS and MYTHS – Ultimate Reloader
ultimatereloader.com
Manufacturers issue warnings for a reason. How many times must they do so?
Lawyers!Manufacturers issue warnings for a reason. How many times must they do so?
"If it chambers as smoothly as factory .223, I don't get excited when I substitute 5.56 in that rifle."Apparently my mid 70s vintage Rem model 700 Varmint Special chambered in .223 Rem has sufficient free bore, as chambering 5.56 (mostly Lake City) has never been a problem, and the LC and other 5.56 rounds I have shot do just fine, as do the handloads made from military brass. As a matter of fact, the only rounds that ever misbehaved were commercial .223 Rem (can't remember the brand) that I bought one 20 round box of years ago; 2 blown primers out of 20 rounds. If it chambers as smoothly as factory .223, I don't get excited when I substitute 5.56 in that rifle.
So you didn't read the link I provided! Good job!!!Manufacturers issue warnings for a reason. How many times must they do so?
Look - you have had good results shooting .556 out of your .223. Many (if not most) guns chambered in .223 will safely shoot .556, though at higher pressure. But those statements will often bring on reminders from others that it might not always be as safe as you might lead other people to believe. Bolt guns can handle pressure (as a rule) significantly better than A/R's - so more reason for warnings.So you didn't read the link I provided! Good job!!!
x3. I have bought a few cases of Norma TAC233 with the 55gr fmj. Pulled em all and replaced them with Nosler Varmageddons. They’ll go 1/2” in my National Match rifle.I would pull the bullets, which were terrible, seat a 50 gr Sierra , without doing anything else and they would shoot 1/2 inch. Shot lots of off hand and running deer matches with them.Buent out 2 barrel to the point they keyhole. Those where the days my friend.
"You choose to believe a garage reloader". Oh, okay, so I'm supposed to believe you?Look - you have had good results shooting .556 out of your .223. Many (if not most) guns chambered in .223 will safely shoot .556, though at higher pressure. But those statements will often bring on reminders from others that it might not always be as safe as you might lead other people to believe. Bolt guns can handle pressure (as a rule) significantly better than A/R's - so more reason for warnings.
I did read your posts. You choose to believe a garage reloader whose' own information underlines that it is not safe in all chambers. Lucky Gunner is a seller of ammunition and (with no hesitation), I'll believe the manufacturers of the guns, barrels, reamers and gunsmiths who make products and whom know the limitations of their products when not used in accordance for which they were designed over your "professionals". When a guy starts dropping 77 or 80 grain .556 into a .223 - one is getting closer to having problems. Guns are proofed to take pressures much higher than which they are designed to run under normal circumstances. The higher the pressure you run - the higher the likelihood of a pressure problem of catastrophic nature.
If you truly believe no guns have blown up over this issue - you just don't know what you don't know. And you are RIGHT that manufacturers warnings are because of lawyers. Somebody has to get sued every time somebody does something stupid - despite having been warned.
That said - I'm glad your .556 ammo is working out for you.
Hey - if you aren't going to believe the folks who make the products who issue their own warnings - I KNOW you aren't going to believe I say those warnings exist or why they might make such warnings - or whether there is validity in their doing so. I'm not trying to change YOUR mind on anything."You choose to believe a garage reloader". Oh, okay, so I'm supposed to believe you?
Why then are there so many post's in this thread and other's from folks who rebuke the claim to not shoot 5.56 in a .223?
"warnings are because of lawyers".
Like the warning tags on hair driers to not use them while showering?
The stupid should be a dying breed but we put warning labels on stuff to help them continue on!
Go figure!
And I declare that you did not read this whole post and or the links I provided otherwise you would realize that your statement about "higher" pressures is based on a lack of knowledge on how ammo is pressure tested.
Yeah, I must be super naïve.I can remember back to when I was naive enough to participate in these types of disagreements.![]()
![]()
![]()
"I don't need to have knowledge on how they tested".Hey - if you aren't going to believe the folks who make the products who issue their own warnings - I KNOW you aren't going to believe I say those warnings exist or why they might make such warnings - or whether there is validity in their doing so. I'm not trying to change YOUR mind on anything.
And I'm not even going to get debate why you shouldn't take a hairdryer into the shower.
I did read your links - and I think you should read them again - especially where they warn about pressure differences in chambers. Maybe you skipped that? But if you are going to use that to show me I'm wrong - and it says what I told you - what is up with that?
If a manufacturer publishes pressures and a reloading manual publishes projected pressures for their loads - I don't need to have knowledge on how they tested. I want to know the results. But if you have a conspiracy theory on that or something - I'd like to hear about it.
I think the gist of what everyone is debating is whether it is Ok for all .223 guns to shoot all .556 as some readers believe to be o.k. - versus some of the chambers being outright dangerous with certain .556.I have a have a 700 Rem Varmint Special, the one that came with a bull barrel, factory chambered in .223, that dates to about 1975. Are you telling me that that beast is going to fail from shooting 5.56 ammo in it? Or are you saying that only Savages chambered in .223 will fail if 5.56 rounds are shot in them?
It's not that it could kill you or blow up your rifle, it's that no good will come from shooting 556 AR ammo in a bolt gun. it's much smarter to reload a longer bullet and seat the bullet closer to the lands then you will be able to put the bullet in the same hole if you take the time and put in the effort to reload. Burn up 556 ammo in a good bolt gun but why? I think most people on this forum will understand why it's not a good option even if you can.Sheesh!! After ALL that's been said and ALL the sources provided you STILL believe shooting a factory 5.56 round through a rifle with a .223 chamber is potentially deadly at the worst and at the least dangerous?!
The pressure load of a factory 5.56 round IS barely loaded to a higher pressure. If you loaded a .223 round to a +P+ level then I'd agree but a factory 5.56 round doesn't even come close to being loaded to that level.
Go back to the beginning of this post and then read it in it's entirety and if you STILL believe it's dangerous then you cannot/will not be convinced!
Again, I say that a rifle chambered for .223 won't know the difference if 5.56 is shot through it...as long as it chambers correctly, meaning no hard bolt levering.It's not that it could kill you or blow up your rifle, it's that no good will come from shooting 556 AR ammo in a bolt gun. it's much smarter to reload a longer bullet and seat the bullet closer to the lands then you will be able to put the bullet in the same hole if you take the time and put in the effort to reload. Burn up 556 ammo in a good bolt gun but why? I think most people on this forum will understand why it's not a good option even if you can.