I think he meant quality wise. The I-guaging aren’t cheap on quality.What a bunch of snobs.
It can certainly be interpreted that way if you choose. I've seen some responses here that favor inexpensive tools while others prefer higher dollar tools that perform the same function. If you want to see some snobbery, jump in on one of the threads where some guys insist you need a $500 to $1500 reloading press or your ammo will be crap.What a bunch of snobs.
Been there, done that. You sir confirmed my short statement.It can certainly be interpreted that way if you choose. I've seen some responses here that favor inexpensive tools while others prefer higher dollar tools that perform the same function. If you want to see some snobbery, jump in on one of the threads where some guys insist you need a $500 to $1500 reloading press or your ammo will be crap.
Maybe. But this is a forum where expensive and high quality tools go with the territory.What a bunch of snobs.
Well Done !point taken, and a good point at that. This is a expensive sport. In particular with the cost and scarcity of components the days. However I do question the need for always having the most expensive tools available. How many here will ever see any difference with shoulder or seating depth measured to .0005 ? I am a average middle of the pack F class shooter at this point and I certainly cannot at my level of expertise. Maybe the top .5% - 1% might be able to see a small difference in their groups but the other 99% of us will be better off spending the money on practice so we can make wind calls
The only place I really consider that depth of resolution necessary might be in neck wall thickness and no caliper is the correct tool for measuring that.
Have a new Hornady that won't shut off, I just pull the batt when not in use.Unless you plan on removing the battery while it's not in use, don't buy one of those cheap chinesium ones. You'll end up paying the cost of a Mitutoyo in batteries in about a year.