Deleted noremaximus
Okay, ill try going towards jam for 6 thousands. Not comfortable going any further. I'll post picks on how it went.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.002 should be good, if it is consistent.I'm working on it. neck tension falls within 1-2 thousands.
One, three-shot test group for each condition?
I think you need to redesign the test.
Start with a load you have a lot of experience with, not necessarily your best load but a good one with a lot of experience. This is your "control". Shoot a ten shot group with the control. Then guess at the right answer for your test and shoot a ten shot group with this best guess. Then shoot a ten shot group on either side of you best guess followed by another ten shot control.
Now you have sufficient data to make the next iteration if needed.
What I am trying to say in a nice way is that at this point your data is not worth much.In what way Chkunz? What would I need to change?
thank you.What I am trying to say in a nice way is that at this point your data is not worth much.
Start over with a test plan that will give meaningful results. I gave you an example of a test plan that involves five ten shot groups and will probably require at least one follow up test. Some will say that is a lot of rounds but you just conducted a 24 shot test that is worthless.
Mother Nature is a bitch and it takes a statistically significant set of data to draw a reasonable conclusion.
Best wishes and thanks for sharing data. Opinions are cheep but data is valuable.
RDF = random damn flyer. I have 2 box's in the cabinet both half full . I tried them in .223 and .260 Remington and never could get a half way decent group. Just my opinion but they are a waste of powder and primersAnyone that has shot the 140 RDF bullets, does this look normal? Or is something off in my brass prep? Thanks.
I tried to stay in my lane lately but this thread has prompted some thought.A bit more information. Based on OCW optimal charge is 39.7gr. Any thoughts? So next step seat towards jam? How far do you guys suggest? Don't want to be close to jam point.
View attachment 1239399
Looking @ OCW test 39.7 is where I'd look for sure.I tried to stay in my lane lately but this thread has prompted some thought.
I'm not a professional at these Creedmoor or OCD formats but it seems to me that location of groups centers are what we are looking during this part not group size or shape that can be influenced by seating depth and NT so with that in the fore front and help me here @BCz there are 4 out of 5 groups that impact near the same location so with that in mind do you think 39.7 is legit or perhaps I'm not seeing something.
If your referring to the 136L'S it's my favorite bullet.Thanks for all the great information. Accurate Shooter is a gold mine for people that are just getting started like me. Honestly, I'm quite overwhelmed. A lot of great information, but I am a bit over my head. I might have to re-read the post a few times. First, I will be reviewing my brass prep. I'm not to confident that my brass is all concentric. Second, I will be reviewing my neck tension. I feel that I can improve on those two sections quite a bit. I'm going to run OCW and Seat Depth test on lapua Scenar-L bullets once I'm sure I get my process down. Still have lots to improve on. Thanks again for all the help.