The problem with online reviews is they can be very accurate if you keep seeing the same problems.... Unfortunately some just plain old don't know how to work the products... The other problem is there's NOT alot of people posting good reviews if the product works as expected... That's a shame... I recently ordered a product and the reviews were not good at all... I figured people just didn't understand how it needed to be setup and even some of the reviews even explained what needed to be done to setup correctly... They came in and worked flawlessly if you know what a thing does , it's limits and how it is supposed to work... Sometimes you just have to take a chance... The good thing is most companies will return your money or replace the product with a simple call if there's an actual problem or explain what's going on so you can get it going...I Personally have no problem with this rifles accuracy, I shoots like a dream. But before i received the rifle i researched it and many of the comments were very negative. Not one to let some one else's comments deter me i got the rifle..... and love it. I checked the action screws, 65 lbs as per Kimber. stock was free floating with a little forend tip contact. I usually will remove that and load develop with a totally FF barrel ( if no good i can add some marine tex and replace the contact) I do generally like to seat my bullets .005-.010 off the rifling but when i "jammed" this one .040 off. I expected the worst But this rifle shot good right off the bat. BUT LOUD with the most accurate load tested. Barnes 80 gr TTSX and 47 gr of H380 and Fed Mag primers. Your previous comments enticed me to continue with further load development. SO.....I loaded H380 with a 100 gr bullet hopping more powder will burn in the barrel and reduce blast? I had poor luck with IMR4350 So i'm excluding at this time. i'm also trying RE19 with both the 80 and 100 grain bullet. I could not find load data for VVn135 If you have a personal recipe or could point me in the right direction I'll give it a whirl. I hope to get to the range soon and i'll give an up date.
Thanks for the help....and hearing related humor. But no joke..... When i was chronoing this beast the blast blew off the first sky screen.... 10 ft away.... no damage but WOW.
I have a 25-05 with a 22” barrel. Talk about a lot of muzzle blast and loud!! A lot of powder down a short tube will be a lot louder.
I love the Barnes 80 gn ttsx in my .257 Roberts, Mines in a Ruger Hawkeye and after a load development is shooting 5/8" groups at 3350 fps using H-4350. No need to worry how it works on deer as they will be dead with proper shot placement as with any caliber. Big problem now is Barnes bullets are nonexistent.I did get out to the range this week to try a few new recipes. Nosler 100gr BT with H380 shot MOA at 100yds. The Barnes 80gr TTSX with RE19 1 1/2"
I had some OLD lead tip BT's and tried them with RE19 1 3/4" The LOUD load still shot best. So in conclusion I'm sticking with the 80 grain TTSX and H380 powder.
Now i need to throw one more thing out to the crowd. Does any one have deer hunting experience with the Barnes 80gr TTSX? I have never used a pure copper bullet and nothing that light. I have had great success with the 100gr BT in both the 250 Sav. and 257 Roberts. I called Barnes, and the person assured me that i will be very impressed with the results as long as i keep the velocity above 1900 fps. He calculated my load would be good to 400 yds. Recovered bullets from the berm are impressive. average expansion 1/2" with ridicules weight retention. Like 98%
Let me know of your successes or failures.
Ever held a 257 Roberts cartridge in hand? The "problem" in my mind is many of those 25 caliber bullets are long and slender and, though the SA can handle the 57mm length brass, bullets have to be stuffed into it pretty deep. That takes up usable powder space. Yes, the original loadings were rather anemic but the later +P denotations have more potential and deserve a longer action to reach that potential (at least in my opinion). While on the "shortcomings" (sarcasm) of the 257 Bob I would say, should I decide to build a rifle from scratch, my perfect bolt gun would be something like a Terminus Kratos Lite long action in a carbon fiber stock and a 24" barrel of a slightly faster twist than the (to quote those gun scribes) ubiquitous 1 in 10. Afterall, there has been a tremendous amount of upgrade to the .257 caliber bullet over he years.Isn't the 257 based on the 7x57 Mauser ? As in the "57" is the case length in mm ? Isn't that a design flaw to put a long action cartridge in a short action ? The 308 is 51 mm ??
257 bullets slender? Yes.Ever held a 257 Roberts cartridge in hand? The "problem" in my mind is many of those 25 caliber bullets are long and slender and, though the SA can handle the 57mm length brass, bullets have to be stuffed into it pretty deep. That takes up usable powder space. Yes, the original loadings were rather anemic but the later +P denotations have more potential and deserve a longer action to reach that potential (at least in my opinion). While on the "shortcomings" (sarcasm) of the 257 Bob I would say, should I decide to build a rifle from scratch, my perfect bolt gun would be something like a Terminus Kratos Lite long action in a carbon fiber stock and a 24" barrel of a slightly faster twist than the (to quote those gun scribes) ubiquitous 1 in 10. Afterall, there has been a tremendous amount of upgrade to the .257 caliber bullet over he years.
Maybe I should go a little farther with my "long bullet" comment.257 bullets slender? Yes.
Long? Not so much.
And we are talking about the traditional hunting bullets, not the custom twist requiring 131, or 135gr.
The COAL for a 100gr bullet in the Roberts isn't going to be that different than a 100 gr bullet in the 6mm Rem.
A 140gr bullet in the parent 7X57 Mauser is going to be a fair bit longer.
The 7x57 (and forgive my historical ignorance) was introduced in the Mauser action and that, in reality, isn't a short action is it? It is certainly not as short as the 84M (Mauser pattern) in the OP's post. My 84M Hunter would not eject a live round.
I used to speak of, when the talk around the table at hunting camp was on cartridges, "308 based" cartridges. My good friend who had spent many years in Germany would spend the rest of the evening and a good bottle of whiskey telling me of all the cartridges spawned from the mighty 7x57 Mauser. But I do believe (and not of 7x57 linage) the 9.3x74R to be his favorite.Yes ! That is what I was alluding to. The original small and large ring Mausers and the cartridges designed for them are more "long action" than "short action" I dont have my reference and all but they both are longer than the "short action" as used by later and mostly American Mfg. The basis, I think for the SA is the 7.62x51. And the basis for the Mausers is 7x57, 8x57 or 6.5 x 55. So using a cartridge deigned originally, or sourced from a "long action" in a short one is swimming upstream, running in sand, barking up the wrong tree. Or, running out of action length to function with longer bullets. All keyboard warrior comments. I have held all the cartridges except the Bob and have reloaded and fired them.
Looks like the weapon I am glad I didn't buy, the Montana Rifle Co in 6.5x55. They offered it in their short action with a 1:9 twist !@#@!
It's really more of an "intermediate" action, the Yugoslavian / Serbian M48 rifles have an action length specifically for the 8X57MMJS cartrige for example, but retain all the cock on open controlled round feed design features of the 98 Mauser action. This can make for difficulties trying to put one of those actions with 7 and 5/8" center to center action bolt dimensions into a 98 Mauser stock with 7 and 7/8" dimensions. But it's also problematic to try to fit that action into a common "short" action for cartridges based on the 308 Winchester with ?X51mm case dimensions.Maybe I should go a little farther with my "long bullet" comment.
Over the last few years many bullet designs and trends have been for longer and heavier bullets with different types of ogive and length of bearing surface. The 25 calibers will likely never match up with lengths of 7mm bullets of today and that is not even, IMO, a fair assessment. The fact that 257 Roberts and 7x57 are the same case is as far as the comparison should go in this conversation.
I am a huge 7mm bullet fan. I've hunted with the 7MM08 almost exclusively for the last 30 years and have ultimate confidence in the cartridge and the bullets. I've also shot them in long range (out to 1,000) competitions with a good degree of success. The 7x57 (and forgive my historical ignorance) was introduced in the Mauser action and that, in reality, isn't a short action is it? It is certainly not as short as the 84M (Mauser pattern) in the OP's post. My 84M Hunter would not eject a live round.