I bought a Teslong borescope to confirm some of my barrels are toasted and to confirm I am lousy at cleaning.
1. My main prairie dog rifle, a Remington XR-100, that has several thousand rounds (sometimes through a hot barrel) through was it severely fire cracked and eroded. No surprise as a 62 grain bullet will no longer touch the lands. Anyway, it still shoots MOA so it still is #1. My oldest 700 223 backup rifle that has not been shot hot also has some cracking..... kind of a surprise.
2. By Beloved 1952 Remington 721 300 H&H was pretty badly fire cracked too. Kind of a little surprise, but burning 70 grains of powder each shot takes a toll I suppose The biggest surprise was the amount of copper - ugh. It is soaking right now.
3. After looking at the well shot 223's, I looked in 2 1999 vintage 700's that have less than 50 rounds through each. In addition to the tooling marks, the beginning of the rifling was not uniform. There is a half moon where about 3 of the lands don't reach the neck of the chamber. What is up with this? Both rifles shoot sub MOA.
1. My main prairie dog rifle, a Remington XR-100, that has several thousand rounds (sometimes through a hot barrel) through was it severely fire cracked and eroded. No surprise as a 62 grain bullet will no longer touch the lands. Anyway, it still shoots MOA so it still is #1. My oldest 700 223 backup rifle that has not been shot hot also has some cracking..... kind of a surprise.
2. By Beloved 1952 Remington 721 300 H&H was pretty badly fire cracked too. Kind of a little surprise, but burning 70 grains of powder each shot takes a toll I suppose The biggest surprise was the amount of copper - ugh. It is soaking right now.
3. After looking at the well shot 223's, I looked in 2 1999 vintage 700's that have less than 50 rounds through each. In addition to the tooling marks, the beginning of the rifling was not uniform. There is a half moon where about 3 of the lands don't reach the neck of the chamber. What is up with this? Both rifles shoot sub MOA.
