A good question, and one I asked myself. I do it to ensure that each primer is seated to a precise depth.I'm probably going to regret this... but besides weight, what other parameter are you finding significant enough to warrant measuring?
Some try to shoot extremely small and precise on every target, and do just that almost every time they shoot a match. When I see your winning results and aggregates, I will pay more attention to your inputs and advises. Until such a time, I will continue paying most attention to the inputs, advises, and methods used by those that are winning. Myself will continue testing as many aspects that I can, and put in the due diligence to every probable effecting aspect that I choose to test and/or utilize.Somebody’s got a hell of a lot of spare time.
Jim I've talked to alot of shooters/forum members on the phone while discussing stock work and paint.Somebody’s got a hell of a lot of spare time.
Asked any LR-Benchrest shooters that win often and/or hold records, if they do?.... Trust me I've asked guys that hold records, win matches and shoot on the US Fclass team.
Jim I've talked to alot of shooters/forum members on the phone while discussing stock work and paint.
I've asked most all of them about weight sorting primers......
I have yet to get a yes answer.
Trust me I've asked guys that hold records, win matches and shoot on the US Fclass team.
I assume that a pesky flier is a 10 instead of an X?
![]()
Trust me mike I've thought about the flat out lying part.I think you'll find in the winner's circle, there are those who will tell you they are doing it, and the rest are lieing to you.
It's less about what they weigh, and more about keeping the high ones from being shot in a group with some low ones, or vice versa. I can tell you the guys in 1k br that are winning, and running aggregates are doing it. And many top winning f class shooters that are doing it, wont tell you they are because they dont want you to do it. Ask @dkhunt14 how many big f class guys have asked him, and reported back what happened when they started.
Now, if you cant get your gun under say 6-7" for ten shots at 1k, you're likely not going to see the improvement. You still have other issues to work out. But the key to this game is eliminating those pesky fliers.
I guess you need a prioritized list of excuses on your dope card
With primer weight being at the bottom.
When you guys usually shoot nothing but cleans an extra point won't help.
For us that shoot less than that, a point is a point.
Mike ; I did the weigh primers thing for over a year , using S&B SRP's and Rem 7-1/2 BR's . Used all the "out-lyers" for practice , and the "good" ones for matches . Didn't see any difference in scoring over the period , so I spent more time on the range , instead of in front of the scale . My scores slowly got better . But if you think there's a advantage to doing it , then by all means , keep doing it .![]()
Jim I've talked to alot of shooters/forum members on the phone while discussing stock work and paint.
I've asked most all of them about weight sorting primers......
I have yet to get a yes answer.
Trust me I've asked guys that hold records, win matches and shoot on the US Fclass team.
No excuses....I guess you need a prioritized list of excuses on your dope card
With primer weight being at the bottom.
When you guys usually shoot nothing but cleans an extra point won't help.
For us that shoot less than that, a point is a point.
@MikeMcCasland thanks for starting this thread, I’m on a steep earning curve here.
For those that found swapping primers made a load better, did you basically repeat the whole ladder with the different primers or just find a node then try a few different primers at the same charge?
some people do not read the fine print.
it started with 1000 br, it applies to 1000 yd br.
maybe others, no promises,
your targets are too big, your shooting aint as precise.
real life
