Well, there you have it. It's dust, not beans. And all someone has to do is ask David what's in it if they're concerned about lead or the like.
The IMR Enduron powders are touted as having copper suppressing properties as well, but CFE 223 seems unique in a couple of respects. First, it's oddly unstable in certain cartridges, for example in 6mm Rem. Hodgdon do not publish data for it, yet they do for 243 Win. Wondering why, I called Hodgdon about it and was advised "Do not try CFE 223 in 6mm Rem!"Might prove beneficial in breaking in a factory barrel. I think the purpose of the shoot one, clean shoot again, clean etc it to keep the tooling marks from filling with copper and preventing the ironing out by the bullets. Use the decoppering powder for break in and all you need do between shots is run a patch through to keep the carbon low between shots. Should really speed the process.
Few new powders out there claim they reduce copper in bbls ,how do they do that ?
Bismuth. Its the going ingredient of our timeDon't really know what they add to cut down on cooper wash, but it really is not new. Winchester used it in some of their powders years ago and the military has done so for quite awhile also.
Few new powders out there claim they reduce copper in bbls ,how do they do that ?
Not lackluster , shame on you ! It is very lustrous.I've tried CFE223. It's a lackluster spherical that carbon fowls like crazy. No copper buildup though =P
I'm 52 and remember learning crude laser technology when I was a kid. So, in the same 40(or more) years, guns have changed very little but have improved. Why aren't we firing laser beams at coyotes by now?In the last 40 years we have gone from having a telephone on the wall with a rotary dial, to a handheld computer that connects to every piece of data in the entire world.
But from reading the responses on this forum, everything that could possibly be invented in the firearms industry has already been invented.
It's called TECHNOLOGY. Stuff changes.
I'm 52 and remember learning crude laser technology when I was a kid. So, in the same 40(or more) years, guns have changed very little but have improved. Why aren't we firing laser beams at coyotes by now?
My point is..neither of us do. Today's firearms, BR rifles in particular, are amazingly accurate but are archaic by contrast. Apparently, "they" don't want any of us to have them. Of course, when I was that young, the world was a different place. You could buy a gun by mail order and I'm pretty sure that if one of us could've built that laser rifle, we'd be wealthy and the gov't wouldn't have been all in our bidness about it until tax time. Times have changed but guns, not so much.Maybe they don't want you having laser beams.
I'm 52 and remember learning crude laser technology when I was a kid. So, in the same 40(or more) years, guns have changed very little but have improved. Why aren't we firing laser beams at coyotes by now?
And still today, the last day of the year 2019, we are using mechanical triggers to ignite an explosion, that incites the burning of smokeless powder, to propel a copper clad lead projectile at mundane trajectories...and we are touting bismuth, a metal, being fired down the bore to reduce copper fouling, as the next coming. And guess where a big portion of bismuth comes come...Yep, China.Let’s see... there were “communicators” in the first Star Trek TV series that are now called cell phones, then “Touch Pads” in the second Star Trek TV series that are now called tablets, the military is testing laser anti-missile systems, I’m thinking hand held versions might not be too far off! Just imagine how humane “stun” mode would be... hostiles could be neutralized without being lethal!
Edit... regrets for this post being so off topic!
I have no idea what it is but if it'll shoot zero aggs, UBR 266's and 250-25x targets...I LIKE it a LOT!