I found this list http://www.jbmballistics.com/ballistics/lengths/lengths.shtml which show the length of the 107s and 115DTACs as being more compatible (according to the Berger twist rate calculator) than the 110 smk.Don't know about 115 DTACs specifically but assume you'd be pretty into the lands. If you're thinking 115 DTACS, why the SMK 107's and not the SMK 110s? the 110's and 115's are more comparable than the 107's.
I found this list http://www.jbmballistics.com/ballistics/lengths/lengths.shtml which show the length of the 107s and 115DTACs as being more compatible (according to the Berger twist rate calculator) than the 110 smk.
I do have a modified case on order.
any thoughts on Tubb final finish instead of barrel break in?
by length compatibility I meant with regard to stabilization. My RPR has a 7.7t. With the longer 110SMK, according to the Berger calculator, there would be a less than ideal stabilization compared to the 107s or DTACs.Overall bullet length (from jbm link) is only one part of the equation and not the most important part, what matters is the base to ogive (where the lands will touch) measurement which can vary substantially, even if two bullets have the same total length.
by length compatibility I meant with regard to stabilization. My RPR has a 7.7t. With the longer 110SMK, according to the Berger calculator, there would be a less than ideal stabilization compared to the 107s or DTACs.
Don’t bother with a break-in, the kit is MUCH more aggressive and thorough than any normal break-in regimen could achieve. I used the complete kit, and it moved the leade out to a normal length. Now I can load 105 Hybrids out to a bit over mag length, and it I’ll be touching the lands.I just got a RPR in 6CM also and have been following this thread. I have not shot it yet. I have a question about the Tubb Final Finish Sysyem. Can that be done in lieu of a barrel break in or is it better to do the break in routine first? I plan on shooting 107SMK or 115 DTACs.
I called Ruger and they offered up no headspace numbers, but they said they'd like the rifle back to take a look at it. I'm really hesitant to send it back, now that my F-class season started, but I would like to load the 105s and 108s out to where they should be, and not pushed back into the powder space in the case. Is it difficult to ream a throat by hand, without a lathe?
Tubb kit? What's that going to do?Yup a good deal of work. Get the Tubb kit.
So I'm a noob but if I understand the Tubb system and what it does are some magic bullets supposed to fix a throat that's .156" too shallow? Maybe I'm missing something.It will lengthen throat out. Talked about in this thread.
any gunsmith can set the throat to fit whatever length you want in very short order. ruger dont have a clue what youre trying to do. they order saami reamers and thats what it is.
I'll agree with part of this. My problem is^^^^