mtncwru
Gold $$ Contributor
Oh yes, there are a WIDE variety of wrenches you can throw into that example. I was working on the assumption that if someone is just throwing loads, they're looking to decrease variance and are less interested in perfect charge weights every time. For that, you just gotta weigh them.Sorry for starting this![]()
... anyhow - another wrench for the "real math" example above, if you throw two half loads, you will have to have two perfect throws to reach the target weight, if you just throw one load, you will only need one accurate throw....
I follow the "Handloading Hump Day" series that the AMU publishes on their Facebook page, and I find it quite interesting the things they choose to care about when it comes to reloading processes. Over the years they've experimented with all sorts of things in an effort to determine the most efficient use of their armorers' time. Even with the thousands of rounds they load each year, they still take the time to weigh every powder charge, including their pistol charges, if I recall correctly. I think that's one of the strongest arguments in favor of weighing every charge: if it didn't matter, if there was a faster way that gave as good a result, the AMU wouldn't take the time to do it.