So Ledd,
If buying a new scope for Fclass, would you buy the Kahles or the Delta?
If buying a new scope for hunting, would you buy the Kahles or the Delta?
If buying a new scope for ELR, would you buy the Kahles or the Delta?
(Lastly, who did you order the Delta from? Link?)
Good questions. I have thought a lot about this actually as there are a lot of different features between the two scopes. So get comfortable...
1: F-Class, I've never shot F-class but have been contemplating starting because I enjoy prone shooting from a bipod. However, I personally would go with the Kahles for competing in F-Class at 1K.
- The Kahles cuts the mirage better than anything I've seen making it very easy to maintain a sharp image on max power with mirage. Some folks want to see a lot of mirage, but with the very wide field of view, I would just try to use wind flags for wind calls and be delighted to know I have a very consistent and precise POA on the target.
- It is the ONLY high power competition scope on the market that can claim absolute perfect 100% mechanical reliability with every single scope tested. You can buy with the confidence knowing you will have a rock solid optic on top of your rifle.
- Kahles turrets adjust in 1/8 MOA increments where the Delta I have adjusts in 0.1 mils (1/3 MOA). The Kahles turrets will be more precise.
2: For hunting, I would go with the Delta.
- The low end 5x magnification would allow for closer range shots.
- It has an excellent zero stop system which I really like having when in the field because many times I have multiple tags in my pocket. Or I dial for a shot and it doesn't work out so I need to bring the turret back to zero.
- The color rendition is so much better which I think would help with target acquisition on distant animals buried in foliage during low light.
- The scope has over 100 MOA of elevation (my turrets are actually in mils which I like better for hunting since they dial yardages faster). This allows for long range hunting with any capable cartidge using any base and rings you choose. No need for elevation compensating rings and bases if you don't want to use them. It also has an excellent illuminated center dot on the reticle to aid shots during those last minutes of waning shooting light.
- "My" Delta scope was mechanically perfect for zero hold and turret return to zero, but one scope test doesn't prove a lot. It's a good start, but there will have to be many more successful tests on many more scopes of that model before it can be deemed a reliable optic everyone can buy with confidence.
3: ELR competition, it's a toss up. If you don't want to buy additional expensive high level elevation bases or adjustable bases, then the Delta is your scope. It has about 43+ MOA more elevation built in over the Kahles. But if you want to buy all the expensive adjustable bases, the Kahles can get the job done just as well. Both have great reticles for hold over and aiming small that are virtually identical in design features. The Delta center dot is just a hair bigger, but the horizontal and vertical hash marks are just a hair thinner. I like the little thicker dot on the Delta because it doesn't get lost on dark backgrounds quite as easy and it can be illuminated, but that's just personal preference. Both have good glass, and again, the Austrian glass in the Kahles will resolve better through mirage so just depends on what you want. However, the "apparent magnigication" in the Delta seems to be higher making objects look bigger on its 50x setting vs the Kahles on 50x. Makes those very distant ELR targets seem just a little bigger when aiming. Also remember that the Kahles turrets are 1/8 MOA and the Delta is 0.1 mils.
Here's a link to where I purchased the Delta Stryker HD 5-50x56. Delta also offers another model Stryker HD with all the same features in 4.5-30x56. Only difference is it has a FFP reticle. Just some extra info if that would be more to someone's liking.
https://www.optics-trade.eu/us/delta-optical-titanium-5-50x56-hd-sfp.html