Ex- SCOTUS judge wants to squash 2nd Amendment

[pirate ammo]

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz,from Florida,says the 2 amenment does not cover the right to have BULLETS,go for them>doesn't understand the mind of the RELOADER.

 

[Richard Coody]

i believe they call the first 10 amendment to the constitution "The Bill of Rights". pretty serious to even discuss eliminating one of those. What next?

i this were to happen then all that America stands for is in serious jeopardy.

 

[Blackthorn]

And what makes you think they follow the rules....

Because even as distasteful as it would be to liberal lawyers they would stand up for the process. They realize once you tamper with the Constitution in a falsehood under the guise righteousness their beliefs could fall under the same weight.

 

[Hasbeen1945]

The X justice wants to repeal the second amendment. The question is how many present members of the court feel the same way. The number should scare all gun owners.

 

[JLT]

Because even as distasteful as it would be to liberal lawyers they would stand up for the process. They realize once you tamper with the Constitution in a falsehood under the guise righteousness their beliefs could fall under the same weight.

Very well-said and I generally agree with your point, however, the realization in situations so grave often comes too late.

 

[hogpatrol]

That old fool just gave the gun rights advocates a HUGE gift. He will help mobilize the pro gun voters for the next election. Thank you, Justice Stevens.

 

[Shrek]

The X justice wants to repeal the second amendment. The question is how many present members of the court feel the same way. The number should scare all gun owners.

I’d guess the communists four.

 

[okie]

I wish I could have the traitors citizenship "repealed".

 

[Milo 2.0]

He voted anti 2nd his whole career, not sure why this comes as a shock. Major SCOTUS decisions have always been split, with huge impact cases decided by 1 vote. In my lifetime, it's always been opinion of the law more than the intent.
This same agenda has been ginsburgs goal since day one too.
One more thing, a person needs to look back to the person that appointed him, what was Ford's ultimate agenda, he had 5 yrs to evaluate after Nixon elevated Stevens to circuit judge.

 

[CT10ring]

He voted anti 2nd his whole career, not sure why this comes as a shock. Major SCOTUS decisions have always been split, with huge impact cases decided by 1 vote. In my lifetime, it's always been opinion of the law more than the intent.
This same agenda has been ginsburgs goal since day one too.
One more thing, a person needs to look back to the person that appointed him, what was Ford's ultimate agenda, he had 5 yrs to evaluate after Nixon elevated Stevens to circuit judge.

I wrote a reply immediately to NYT - they solicit readers comments - after reading the article early yesterday a.m.
Which I do from time to time - Pro 2A & carefully worded responses that represent a gun owner's point of view.

They declined to publish my reply.

 

[okie]

I wrote a reply immediately to NYT - they solicit readers comments - after reading the article early yesterday a.m.
Which I do from time to time - Pro 2A & carefully worded responses that represent a gun owner's point of view.

They declined to publish my reply.

appreciate that you tried

 

[hogpatrol]

NYT print a pro-gun or pro hunting article or comment? Surely you jest. The only thing that rag is good for is starting a fire.

 

[CT10ring]

NYT print a pro-gun or pro hunting article or comment? Surely you jest. The only thing that rag is good for is starting a fire.

They have printed my replies in the past. Surprisingly, there are some pro-gun guys who respond often, and give another point of view, Pro 2A + Pro gun. It's like pissing in the ocean (with regard to the NYT) , but some do get printed as a rebuttal to their stories & offer another (pro gun owner's) point of view. On the first day of spring, the NYT ran an article about the DANGERS OF SUNSHINE. Imagine how they feel about black guns if sun scares em. jiminy...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/...n=latest&contentPlacement=3&pgtype=collection

 

[pirate ammo]

why do most anti-gun advocates always say they come from a family of hunters,,don't make sence,strange

 

[hogpatrol]

They have printed my replies in the past. Surprisingly, there are some pro-gun guys who respond often, and give another point of view, Pro 2A + Pro gun. It's like pissing in the ocean (with regard to the NYT) , but some do get printed as a rebuttal to their stories & offer another (pro gun owner's) point of view. On the first day of spring, the NYT ran an article about the DANGERS OF SUNSHINE. Imagine how they feel about black guns if sun scares em. jiminy...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/nyregion/new-york-today-spring-sunburn.html?rref=collection/column/ny-today-daily-briefings&action=click&contentCollection=nyregion&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=3&pgtype=collection

It's a rag for the snowflakes and uber left.

 

[Ray B]

In listening to the retired judge, I think he is merely identifying the problem and saying IF those that want to eliminate legal guns in the country are to do more than just make noise, the have to eliminate the second amendment. Basically, he is saying the second amendment is the major roadblock to the antis endeavor. I don't know that he is advocating the repeal, just saying that any significant elimination of guns in the US requires it's repeal; and in that regard, he is correct. However, those that would seek to follow that course of action really should get all of the data and run a computer program on the possible outcomes of such an action- I suspect that the outcome would make Hitler's Operation Barbarossa look like military genius in comparison.

 

[KMart]

NYT print a pro-gun or pro hunting article or comment? Surely you jest. The only thing that rag is good for is starting a fire.

You forgot the bottom of the birdcage or usage in an outhouse.

 

[Tesoro]

In listening to the retired judge, I think he is merely identifying the problem and saying IF those that want to eliminate legal guns in the country are to do more than just make noise, the have to eliminate the second amendment. Basically, he is saying the second amendment is the major roadblock to the antis endeavor. I don't know that he is advocating the repeal, just saying that any significant elimination of guns in the US requires it's repeal; and in that regard, he is correct. However, those that would seek to follow that course of action really should get all of the data and run a computer program on the possible outcomes of such an action- I suspect that the outcome would make Hitler's Operation Barbarossa look like military genius in comparison.

Thats why deep thinking people shouldnt be allowed to have their thoughts read to john q public. Unless they are translated into simple english first. You are correct but he is already being jumped on thanks to bad translations by the media. Was it an insinuation? I doubt it him being liberal or not.

 

[Milo 2.0]

He wrote the dissenting opinion on Heller vs DC, losing sides opinion was that individuals do not have the right to own and use guns. This one is simple.

 

[TC260]

Everybody screams about the NRA but what people fail to recognize is that power of the NRA isn't really in the organization itself. It's power is in the millions of extremely loyal and ACTIVE voters it represents. Gun owners go to the polls very predictably, especially when issues effect them and politicians are well aware of that. That's where the power lies.