• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Bullet Sorting Methods

Most of the accuracy gain will come from base to ogive sorting. In my experience bto will correlate to bearing surface as well as other measurements. BTO is also an easy one to do, bearing surface is a more finicky thing to measure and I dont think you can do it as accurately over 1000s of bullets. Reports I am hearing on the latest batch of vapor trails is you cant really sort them they are so good, but like Matt says you still need to do it to find that possible odd ball. The Bob Green tool measures 2 points on the ogive and will help find bullets with a different nose shape which will effect bc. I think its a good tool. I did the BC math one time on bullet weights. The difference in weight is canceled out by the bc change it causes. I dont weigh bullets. The other thing to do is sort by oal base to tip. If your not trimming and pointing.
 
Last edited:
Most of the accuracy gain will come from base to ogive sorting. In my experience bto will correlate to bearing surface as well as other measurements. BTO is also an easy one to do, bearing surface is a more finicky thing to measure and I dont think you can do it as accurately over 1000s of bullets. Reports I am hearing on the latest batch of vapor trails is you cant really sort them they are so good, but like Matt says you still need to do it to find that possible odd ball. The Bob Green tool measures 2 points on the ogive and will help find bullets with a different nose shape which will effect bc. I think its a good tool. I did the BC math one time on bullet weights. The difference in weight is canceled out by the bc change it causes. I dont weigh bullets. The other thing to do is sort by oal base to tip. If your not trimming and pointing.
Please explain how this hits two points of the ogive? Is it custom for each type of bullet?
 
Please explain how this hits two points of the ogive? Is it custom for each type of bullet?

Larry W. was bragging about inventing the 3 point contact and I wondered why all of the reloaders got all giggly. And then I figured it out; none of them ever milked a cow on a four legged stool, I prefer the full circle contact.

F. Guffey
 
so you do not care if you have a bullet that is 0.5 light ?
i just finished sorting 200 bullets.
ONE was 0.5 light. at 1000 that makes no diff of the bearing length is the same ?
(most were plus or minus 0.1 with a few at +/-0.2)
( i do both for long range bullets)

Most of the accuracy gain will come from base to ogive sorting. In my experience bto will correlate to bearing surface as well as other measurements. BTO is also an easy one to do, bearing surface is a more finicky thing to measure and I dont think you can do it as accurately over 1000s of bullets. Reports I am hearing on the latest batch of vapor trails is you cant really sort them they are so good, but like Matt says you still need to do it to find that possible odd ball. The Bob Green tool measures 2 points on the ogive and will help find bullets with a different nose shape which will effect bc. I think its a good tool. I did the BC math one time on bullet weights. The difference in weight is canceled out by the bc change it causes. I dont weigh bullets. The other thing to do is sort by oal base to tip. If your not trimming and pointing.
 
so you do not care if you have a bullet that is 0.5 light ?
i just finished sorting 200 bullets.
ONE was 0.5 light. at 1000 that makes no diff of the bearing length is the same ?
(most were plus or minus 0.1 with a few at +/-0.2)
( i do both for long range bullets)

Plug it into the bc equation. Then mess with a ballistic calculator and quick load for velocity and drops. When I did it, it canceled out. I never have sorted for weight and have never had flier problems. Thats just my experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BP1
Just finished going through my first two 500ct boxes of Berger 105g Hybrids, only to find my just purchased two 500ct boxes, lot C155 are .034" shorter OAL and .037" shorter BTO. Appears that most of this is a change in the boat tail area. Now it's back to load development all over again......sigh.
 
My dog asleep at the base to ogive sorting job! Tried teaching the old lady, that didn't go so good.

Base to ogive is of the more important things IMO. At two different diameters even better yet.

View attachment 1038097

Tom
Nice piece of equipment. Looks like a great guard dog. But the pic begs a host of questions ....yet too much info sometimes is not a good thing.
 
Last edited:
My dog asleep at the base to ogive sorting job! Tried teaching the old lady, that didn't go so good.

Base to ogive is of the more important things IMO. At two different diameters even better yet.

View attachment 1038097

Tom

That the Accuracy One sorter Tom? Haven't seen it mentioned here but looks like a very well thought out piece of equipment.
 
But the pic begs a host of questions ....yet too much info sometimes is not a good thing.

I have read until I have information overload on this subject. At this point I'm a raw rookie loading 200.20x's without sorting them at all. I have 900 split between 2 lot numbers. I'm almost afraid to start sorting them. Perhaps less information is a good thing sometimes.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,969
Messages
2,207,628
Members
79,255
Latest member
Mark74
Back
Top