Yep.
There is one F class shooter on here that used to repeatedly whine because there were so few FTR high masters and so many sling high masters that something should be done. Basically insinuating the sling target must be too large. Once he tried a service rifle I don't think I have seen him mention the target being too large. Interesting how it all changes once a person slings up and has to align sights.
If you are talking about me (and based on our past exchanges I think you are) you misunderstood me. I don't recall that I've ever said that the target was to big in sling (and if I did I was wrong).
I have said that once a shooter learns to build a solid position that it is easier to score well on the sling target based on the scores that I see from good sling shooters compared to those of good F class shooters in similar conditions. In a group of HM sling shooters on an average weekend I am accustomed to seeing 200-# scores. Any time an F-TR shooter shoots a clean anywhere in the country it gets talked about. I have also seen a group of HM sling shooters including a Wimbledon Cup winner shoot an F class match, and they agreed that the target is hard(I think they shot EX scores). On an average day it is certainly easier for a new shooter with decent ammo to put up a SS score on an F class target than on a sling target. They can do it chasing the spotter unless the wind is blowing them to the 7 ring, so from that perspective F class is easier for the beginner.
I have said that HM in long range F class, in particular F-TR relied on getting a really good set of weekends to get the scores to get there and that was not the intent. For the record one of the people who advocated for the proposed changes to the F class classifications a few yrs ago was a past national champion who won the FCNC with an Expert classification (twice I think), at the same time that the World champion also carried an Expert classification.
My argument is and has been that classification should group people of similar skill for competitive purposes and not those who got a good weekend. If it's pertinent I still carry an EX in long range F-TR and I placed in the top 10 at the FCWC, and shot on the second place Rutland Cup team (I was that American on the Canadian KP Ballistics team). The coach made the wind calls but my team score was highest individual score and the 2nd highest V count in F-TR.
Yes, I still think MA and HM classifications are broken in F class, at least for those who shoot F-TR (the open guys seem to do OK with it). I don't have the experience to say one way or the other in sling, and the guys who shoot sling don't seem to have issue with it.
So, nothing has changed the conversation just hasn't come up.
To the point of this thread. Unless you extend the yardage I think that shooting a supported 22LR at 100 yards or less is too easy unless you do it on Rattlesnake Ridge, Raton, Connaught, and maybe Camp Perry where the wind blows, and blows hard.
[edit]
ultimately when you are shooting a supported rifle at any range you reduce the variables to the inherent accuracy of the platform and the wind. If the target size does not cause minor wind changes to lose points it's too easy.