You mean H4350? Right? If you do, then yes it is right in the middle of the 2..So you would say RL 23 falls between h4831 and h4359
This is an older Hodgdon chart that has NONE of the new powders in it..Here's the latest I found and it has most of the new powders.
I am hoping it leans closer to H4831scYou mean H4350? Right? If you do, then yes it is right in the middle of the 2..
If you go to the Alliant load data site, and compare RL-23 with the same cartridges and the same bullets with RL19, you will see just how close they are. Then go compare it on their site, with RL-22 and virtually every cartridge where they use the same bullets, RL-22 is AT LEAST a grain more powder. It can NOT be slower.. But I think it (RL-23) is closer to H4831sc than it is to H4350.. Like I said, go to their load data and see just how close it is to RL-19.I am hoping it leans closer to H4831sc
I think you will be pleasantly surprised trying RL-16 in place of H4350. I have found it to be very nearly identical "load for load" to H4350. AND you have the benefit of some additional velocity!I have replaced Re22 with Re23 and use nearly the same charge. Different powder burn rate charts often have the same powders in different orders. The powder burn rate charts are all relative and I would guess individual cartridges having different capacities and pressures would change the burn rate order. Re23, cheaper than Re22 at my LGS, has sort of become one of my standby powders and I use it in .243, 6.5-06, .280, .300 Win, 6mm AI.
The new Hornady manual, 10th edition, has a relatively up to date powder burn rate chart but new powders are developed as fast as the powder burn rate charts can fit them in and be printed.
I am looking forward to trying Re16 as H4350 is real scarce - what the world really needs is another 4350 type powder.
Ten four on this. I had the same experience.I think you will be pleasantly surprised trying RL-16 in place of H4350. I have found it to be very nearly identical "load for load" to H4350. AND you have the benefit of some additional velocity!
I think you will be pleasantly surprised trying RL-16 in place of H4350. I have found it to be very nearly identical "load for load" to H4350. AND you have the benefit of some additional velocity!
Nvreloader, Posted a chart I believe it was from quick load. Date July 30, 2016Agreed! Just piling on.
Where is reloader 16 on the burn rate chart compared to H4350? I didn't see reloader 16 on the chart anywhere.I think you will be pleasantly surprised trying RL-16 in place of H4350. I have found it to be very nearly identical "load for load" to H4350. AND you have the benefit of some additional velocity!
I don't believe it is>>>However, I have had enough dealings with both to know that they are so close in burn rate as to be almost indistinguishable..Where is reloader 16 on the burn rate chart compared to H4350? I didn't see reloader 16 on the chart anywhere.