Just that it is a cheaper way to start. I did get Giraud's upgrade kit for mine and a carbide 3-way cutter from Bob Jones. I agree that fit and finish don't match the Giraud, but I can do 100 .223 cases in 15 minutes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks. Price although important was not the top priority for me, I wanted something that works out of the box with the least amount of adjustment, Giraud with specific cutters for the caliber I shoot fits my needs best.Just that it is a cheaper way to start. I did get Giraud's upgrade kit for mine and a carbide 3-way cutter from Bob Jones. I agree that fit and finish don't match the Giraud, but I can do 100 .223 cases in 15 minutes.
The cutter is adjustable but also one piece.
You do not adjust the chamfer independent of the debur. It's not hard to set up really. Much easier than say, mounting a scope.
.308
Tell me what picture you want and I'll try
Until I see a sharp close up of either a finished case mouth, or the notch in the cutter blade ... "A picture is worth a thousand words." And we are getting close to that word count. Soon someone will remind me "You like to ask a lot of questions". **
This photo from Giraud's site (Yikes! Slso blurry!) suggests a definite middle flat, i.e. a three-sided notch. Seems like someone with trigger working tools (grinder, files, stones etc.) could take that cutter and widen the center flat, to minimize the chamfering. Maybe even Giraud would do that.
http://www.giraudtool.com/prod03.htm
[** "There is no learning without having to pose a question. And a question requires doubt." Richard Feynman]
-
There is no middle flat on the cutter. I seriously hope this answers your question.
So, this Giraud is as fast and easy as sticking a pencil into an electric sharpener, huh?
I'm considering one myself, but I have two comments:
1. If it's indexing off the shoulder, at first I thought that was a potential problem if all shoulder datums were not already sized exactly the same. But after reconsidering, who cares? As long as every neck (not every overall case) is exactly the same length, who cares about cases' OALs being slightly different? Besides, a subsequent proper shoulder bump (or body size if you like) would then render the case OALs as close to identical as matters, because the necks will be set back right along with the shoulders.
2. Indexing off the shoulders is close to ideal for subsequently using a typical neck turner that indexes off the case mouth, as the depth of cut into the shoulders should be very consistent. I find this very compelling.
3. Concern: Chamfers/deburs the case mouth to a "sharp knife edge finish". Yikes! Really? No way to avoid that? If that's true, it's too bad because I'm prepping cases for ammunition, not for hole punch tools. Is it possible to disable the chamfer/debur entirely, leaving that for a separate task?
-
...I am not concerned with a sharp edge per se. I am concerned with excess chamfering and deburring. IMO the ends of the neck walls, sectioned, should look like a truncated pyramid, with the 90-deg flat top far wider then the side angles created by chamfering and deburring. A "vee" profile case mouth rounded (as you described) enough to only cut warm butter is still waaaay too thin. I believe in removing the absolute minimum of brass from the end of the neck wall, leaving the mouth as beefy as possible to resist deformation from "chamber rash", ejection, and mishandling over time. A pointed case mouth, like a leather hole punch made of brass, is simply too delicate, and unnecessarily so. There's no reason even a VLD bullet needs a chamfer so deep it eats half way through the neck wall.
Assume neck IDs are sized .002" smaller than bullet OD (not atypical.) A chamfer that narrows the square end of the neck wall only .0015 - .0020" is sufficient to create a wide enough funnel - removing any more material is a waste of time and precious wall material. To chamfer so deep as to eat almost halfway into a .012" thick neck wall, or .005", is to form a funnel which is .006" wider than the bullet. To what gain?
But even if a deep VLD chamfer is deemed necessary, there is still no reason in the world to deburr the outside so severely that it eats away far enough to essentially meet the chamfer half way and leave a pointed end. The outside deburr should, literally, just remove any burr of flash left by the trimmer. Any rounding of the outside 90-deg corner can be accomplished with steel wool. I treat the outside corner as if it was a 45 ACP case which headspaces on the case mouth.
-