Not a fan of Pentax but to each their own.You might want to check out the "High End Spotting Scope review in the "Optics" section of this forum. It covers several top-quality brands (including 2 Pentaxes) and is one of the sources I used several years ago when I was looking for a quality spotter at a reasonable price. I chose The Pentax 80ED and have never regretted it. It uses standard eyepieces from any manufacturer, but I went with The Pentax 20-60 variable (the scope is sold with and without eyepieces). For some reason, the Pentax seems to get little attention from shooters but is highly regarded among bird watchers. Try this link: spotting-scopes
Just out of curiosity, what is it that you don't like about the Pentax?Not a fan of Pentax but to each their own.
Interesting fact regarding the review link you provided: The Zeiss Diascope was actually made by Meopta.
Meopta also made all of the original Zeiss Conquest riflescopes that everyone loved so much back in the day. If you ever see a box from the Diascopes or old style conquest scope, you should find a sticker that says “Made in Czeck Republik” (spelled wrong because Germans can’t spell in English)
what scope magnification is needed for thisWith all of my rifle scopes I can see bullet holes at 200yd, so I rarely setup the spotter.
20X works for me. A low cost scope that performs well for the 100-200yd range is the old Weaver T36, which should still be available at good closeout price. At 300+ mirage sometimes becomes bothersome. For relatively fixed style shooting as noted by the OP most moderate fixed power scopes of this description are a good fit. I use the T36 on my 22lr for this purpose.what scope magnification is needed for this
Pentax is not bad glass, but it’s not impressive either. Kind of like Leupold, pretty good but nothing impressive about any of their glass their when considering the competition in the same price pointJust out of curiosity, what is it that you don't like about the Pentax?
Funny to hear you say this about Pentax it is one of the few that can resolve bullet holes at 1000 .... And these bird watchers rave about them..... jimPentax is not bad glass, but it’s not impressive either. Kind of like Leupold, pretty good but nothing impressive about any of their glass their when considering the competition in the same price point
Pentax can’t compete with top end European glass but they always seem to be trying to compare Pentax to Swarovski, Leica, and Zeiss. Just not gonna happen. The old Japanese Nikon glass can compete with top European glass at a much lower price point but Pentax cannot.
Meopta is also one of my favorite optics companies. You get a lot more quality than what you would expect for the price paid and Meopta glass will run with the big dogs.
Nice. Yeah the glass in the old Nikons is pretty amazing. Will run with the best glass out there.After reading this thread, I started watching fleabay for a nikon spotter. A couple days before Christmas I found an 82 ED(old one) at a price I thought I could live with. It was fair enough that I figured if I didn't like it I could at least get my money back or not be out too much. It showed up today and it was like Christmas again. It doesn't even have a mark on the mounting base. It looks as if it had never been used. I put the 30X eyepiece on and took it outside. There is an abandoned building across the road probably a little over 200 yds. away. I didn't put it on a tripod as I didn't have time. I sat in a chair and just put it on my knee just for a quick look. All I can say is...WOW ! It's an impressive piece of glass! I'm planning on taking to the range tomorrow to see if I can spot .22 holes at 300 yds. and do a side by side with my Leica. If it stands up, the Leica may go. It's overkill for what I use a spotter for and then I could build another rifle.