Not only do you get more speed but the most of the time you get better case life from the sharp shoulder. LarryWhy do shooters shoot ai calibers?
Lets say 260 vs 260ai from what ive read u get 100fps faster but barrel life is shorter. To me thats not worth it.
Im just not sure why?
Need info and opinions.
Im asking in general but for my use is for a target gun and probably shoot 1k rounds a yearsI haven't tried a 260AI, but I have a couple 260's. I have used higher loads than most use in an Ackley, without pressure issues. It wasn't as accurate until I dropped to 43gn H4350. With the extra barrel wear of fire forming, it might all depend on your usage.
I have shot almost everything there is to shoot. AND I am a BIG fan of making an A.I. out of cases. "Generally", at least my experience, they are a tad more accurate. The necks do not stretch nearly as much>>>thus trimming is kept to a minimum. AND, depending on the case itself, you can get a substantial increase>>> a .250-3000 gets about a 12+ pct increase, a .257 Roberts and 6mm Rem (same case) gets about an 8 percent increase, most others are about 3-4 percent>>>not a lot>>>but taken in conjunction with the other "improvements", is like icing on the cake!Why do shooters shoot ai calibers?
Lets say 260 vs 260ai from what ive read u get 100fps faster but barrel life is shorter. To me thats not worth it.
Im just not sure why?
Need info and opinions.
What about barrel life?I shoot: 223 AI, 22-6mmAI, 243AI, 260AI, 280AI, 338-06AI, and a 338 LM AI. Main reason is case prolonged csse life (as mentioned above zero to minimal trimming) and some increases in velocity. The only case I haven't noticed any real increase in velocity was the 223, only about 50 fps gain at cost of poor accuracy. I just shoot the same pre AI load, still very accurate. The 22-6 is crazy fast. The 260 AI slight increase in velocity but able to push hotter with less pressure. The 338 LM AI is mostly case preservation due to cost of brass. The 243 AI has 10 loadings as still hasn't been trimmed. In fact I haven't had to trim any AI brass since I started shooting. And I shoot a lot. The AI's look cool to boot. Good luck.
Thanks for the infoThere are benefit potentials to ackley improvements across the board.
A big one, less talked about, is in matching capacity for bullet.
The 260 -vs- 260AI is a perfect demonstration of this. That +100-150fps is a next higher accuracy node with ~140gr bullets, -which are best in cal. This is important, at distance, if wind kicks your butt like pretty much everyone else.
There are folks who act to increase capacity merely to burn more powder for more velocity. Nothing in that is free, but it's just what they want to do, and they'll still get better brass life. This would be a 243AI, or a 22-243AI under many names.
There are folks who increase capacity to get better barrel life. An example is the 6CM (comp match) over the 6XC, or an overbore 6.5saum, to use cooler burning H1000 powder. These are not usually Ackley improvements,, could be. But since nothing is free, I'm sure there is a hit to accuracy(beware ballistic elixirs).
Ackley improvement is also an easy standard. People who know nothing of advanced reloading can improve a cartridge successfully with an Ackley standard. Prep 50 good cases, fire form them, that's 50 cases that will likely outlast the barrel.
For those insisting this is wasteful, keep in mind that you will always fireform cases, improved or not.
If I'm shooting 260 or 260AI, I still have to fire form cases to my chamber before any serious load development or use.
So there is no real waste.
Back to the standard in this: If you've never created a 'wildcat' cartridge, then you'll probably endure a bit of stress in creating a 6Dasher from 6br(similar to Ackley improvement). Yet no stress at all in creating 223AI from 223Rem.