• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

White River Primer Seating

saunaking

Silver $$ Contributor
For anyone using WRE primers, do you have any tips on prepping the primer pockets for seating the primers flush or below flush? Most of the primers I have measured are between .0129 and .0131 in thickness. My primers pockets on .284 Lapua brass after using a K&M primer pocket uniforming tool are .0125 deep.

Most "hand" priming tools like RCBS require a death grip to seat flush or below flush. I just aquired a PCPS priming tool and ran into the same problem with having to use a great deal of force to get the primers flush. If the average primer is this "tall", how much crush will effect ignition?

Is there a primer pocket cutter that will make the pockets deeper without having to worry about the thickness of the flash hole?
Cheers
 
Primer pocket cutter are for uniforming the pocket. Will it give you more room for those primer ? Maybe yes maybe no depending on quality of brass and number of firing. Primer should not be crushed into submission but until anvil is slightly compressed. If those primer don’t work for you - get another brand. Crushing them won’t give you best results. Protruding primer are a no go.
Is you measurement with the anvil or only the cup ? Anvil must be compressed and should not count only the cup thickness.

I doubt those primers are out of specs..problems might be the brass.
 
Last edited:
For anyone using WRE primers, do you have any tips on prepping the primer pockets for seating the primers flush or below flush? Most of the primers I have measured are between .0129 and .0131 in thickness. My primers pockets on .284 Lapua brass after using a K&M primer pocket uniforming tool are .0125 deep.

Most "hand" priming tools like RCBS require a death grip to seat flush or below flush. I just aquired a PCPS priming tool and ran into the same problem with having to use a great deal of force to get the primers flush. If the average primer is this "tall", how much crush will effect ignition?

Is there a primer pocket cutter that will make the pockets deeper without having to worry about the thickness of the flash hole?
Cheers
I take it you're talking about LRP's?

I don't know if the WRE primer cups are as high as something like Winchester's cups at .121", but if they are, there should still be plenty of room to seat at or below flush with over all heights of .129 to .131 and your pockets at .125" deep. I wonder if a different uniforming tool might help, like RCBS's (which is one I use) where it might be the corners at the bottom of the primer pocket having a radius the prevents such primers from seating deeper??? I know my RCBS uniformer squares up the bottom of my pockets pretty well.

What the diameter of those WRE primers, as that might be something that contributing to this issue if they're just a little larger than most?

I've also got a 21st Century hand primer that produces a lot of leverage, which I like because it's so much easier on my old hands than other hand priming tools.
 
It's been well known that the WRE primers are 'tall" compared to other LR primers. I measured some BR2 and CCI 200 primers and got readings from .0119 - .0122, so the lot I have of WRE primers are way tall compared to the other LR primers. Yes, the anvil sticks out way past the cup, unlike most other branded primers.

I tested the seating on new unfired Lapua brass, 2X fired, and 12X fired that had all been uniformed with the K&M tool. This tool has done thousands of cases of LR pockets and still measures .0125 on all Lapua brass (only brass I use for competition).

I have been using my CPS priming tool to prime for 3+ years with the WRE primers. I had to make an adjustment on the CPS tool when switching over from BR2 primers to get .001 below flush seating depth. It has more leverage than the hand primers or the PCPS (Deracco) tool.

Still waiting to hear from the guys that shoot for Team with no name, that are sponsored by WRE.
Cheers
 
It's been well known that the WRE primers are 'tall" compared to other LR primers. I measured some BR2 and CCI 200 primers and got readings from .0119 - .0122, so the lot I have of WRE primers are way tall compared to the other LR primers. Yes, the anvil sticks out way past the cup, unlike most other branded primers.

I tested the seating on new unfired Lapua brass, 2X fired, and 12X fired that had all been uniformed with the K&M tool. This tool has done thousands of cases of LR pockets and still measures .0125 on all Lapua brass (only brass I use for competition).

I have been using my CPS priming tool to prime for 3+ years with the WRE primers. I had to make an adjustment on the CPS tool when switching over from BR2 primers to get .001 below flush seating depth. It has more leverage than the hand primers or the PCPS (Deracco) tool.

Still waiting to hear from the guys that shoot for Team with no name, that are sponsored by WRE.
Cheers
My ADG 6.5 PRC brass has primer pockets at .125" deep. I just now took a Fed 210 primer with a height of .129 and seated it .004 below flush with my 21 Century hand tool and it seated smooth as silk.

This makes me wonder if, other than primer cup diameter, the WRE primers have something going on with cup thickness and/or the anvil itself??? Hmmm, or maybe the primer alloy is just harder???

Wish I had some of the WRE primers just to take measurements and see how they compare. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I used them in New Zealand last year in my 284 with Lapua brass, and borrowed a RCBS hand primer from another shooter to seat the primers. The lot that I used last year seated below flush without too much effort, but still had to use more force than a BR2 or some RWS primers he had. I would not imagine that they are getting different speced primers than we are getting in the US. I know one shooter that was struggling to get them below flush for his prcw that used Lapua 6.5 PRC brass necked up.

My CPS seats them fine for my prcw and 284 brass, and gives me very consistent sd/es numbers. The lot of WRE primers I used last year in NZ gave me an sd of 3 for 5 shot groups, so they work well.
Cheers
 
I used them in New Zealand last year in my 284 with Lapua brass, and borrowed a RCBS hand primer from another shooter to seat the primers. The lot that I used last year seated below flush without too much effort, but still had to use more force than a BR2 or some RWS primers he had. I would not imagine that they are getting different speced primers than we are getting in the US. I know one shooter that was struggling to get them below flush for his prcw that used Lapua 6.5 PRC brass necked up.

My CPS seats them fine for my prcw and 284 brass, and gives me very consistent sd/es numbers. The lot of WRE primers I used last year in NZ gave me an sd of 3 for 5 shot groups, so they work well.
Cheers
Now that I've gotten ahold of some White River LRP's (Magnums, since that's all that I could find), I've disassembled a couple and taken measurements and compared them to CCI 450's I have. It's quite an eye opener and, in my mind, explains a lot of the issue you're having with seating them.

For the most part the WRP's had pretty consistent diameters (almost as consistent as CCI's 450 at .2110"). I only measured 20, but that should be enough to get a good idea what what they're all like. Primer overall height ranged from .1325" to .136" (average being at .1344"). The two I disassembled had a cup height of .120" and .123". The primer weights ranged from 5.64 gr to 5.74 gr with an average of 5.704 gr. The WRP's weighed .484 gr on average more than the CCI's, which suggested heavier components. The two WRP cups measured .0175" thick compared to CCI's .017" thick (the best measurements I could get measuring multiple times). The 2 WRP foils both measured .012" thick. When looking very close at the anvils with magnification, the WRP's looked visibly thicker than the CCI's. Since I didn't have a way to measure the anvil thickness, I weighed them and sure enough, the WRP's were substantially heavier by .24 gr.

Like I previously posted, I took one of my ADG 6.5 PRC cases and seated one of these WRP's using my 21's Century hand seater that is set with a hard stop, which gave me .004" below flush with my Fed 210's. Well, the WRP didn't seat quite as smooth as there was notable resistance as it got to the hard stop. Upon measuring the seating, the WRP was barely below flush. Almost at flush, being just .0005 below flush using my Accuracy One primer gauge. I put the case back into the seater and squeezed to the hard stop a couple more times and the measurement didn't change. I decided to try one more and it only seated exactly flush. Then I thought, I'll adjust my hard stop that should normally give me an additional .004 of seating. I could feel a lot of unusual resistance as I squeezed to that hard stop. The two cases ended up with .0035 below flush.

Given the numbers I'm looking at, I'd say the overall height of the WRP's and the very thick anvil (and the foil too) makes it rather hard to seat them, where that thick anvil tends to resists being squeezed, especially into a someone's shallow primer pockets. Some of the variations making it particularly so. I think these WR LRP's are best suited for primer pockets that are at ~ .130" (like you might find with Peterson brass ;), or trim pockets .004" deeper, which really shouldn't be any kind of big deal, especially if there's a thick web).
White River LR Magnum Primers disassembly.jpg
 
Last edited:
Wow, you really went to great lenths to figure it out. Thank you sir. Your real world findings were much like mine as far as weights and variations of thickness in the primers. I have sorted 2000 of them by weight, and the ones that were used in the PCPS and hand priming tools were at the low end.

My muzzle velocities with them tended to be about 8-10 fps faster then the BR2 primers in my prcw with the same powder charge and seating depths when I tested them this year.

Fortunately there was a good sale on BR2 primers yesterday, so I bought a couple cases that should keep for the next few years. :)
Cheers
 
So will
RCBS Ram Prime, that goes on the press will seat or crush anything. Ever when pockets a not deep enough.

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?media/saami-primers.1299/
the PCPS, IME

For anyone using WRE primers, do you have any tips on prepping the primer pockets for seating the primers flush or below flush? Most of the primers I have measured are between .0129 and .0131 in thickness. My primers pockets on .284 Lapua brass after using a K&M primer pocket uniforming tool are .0125 deep.

Most "hand" priming tools like RCBS require a death grip to seat flush or below flush. I just aquired a PCPS priming tool and ran into the same problem with having to use a great deal of force to get the primers flush. If the average primer is this "tall", how much crush will effect ignition?

Is there a primer pocket cutter that will make the pockets deeper without having to worry about the thickness of the flash hole?
Cheers
The K&M is adjustable for depth
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,591
Messages
2,235,965
Members
80,590
Latest member
Quickfish
Back
Top