I have all three and like the C best especially for long distanc. The field of view is uncluttered, very nice.Scope ACTAR F1 - Mil-R, Mil-C, Mil-XT
For long range, 1500 yds and out, which of these reticles do you prefer
I have all three and like the C best especially for long distanc. The field of view is uncluttered, very nice.Scope ACTAR F1 - Mil-R, Mil-C, Mil-XT
For long range, 1500 yds and out, which of these reticles do you prefer
thank youI have all three and like the C best especially for long distanc. The field of view is uncluttered, very nice.
MOAR T is not available in a first focal plane.
MOAR is available but the lines are too fat for me.
I have an Atacar second focal plane in MOAR T already.
I am Looking at the "Mil-rad" this time.
ThanksYes, that "fatness" problem is the main reason I prefer SFP for just about everything, and certainly for long range.
I might go to a more powerful NF, like the Competition or a bigger ATACR, but I would not even consider going to a fatter reticle than the MOAR-T.
Not that you can't make anything work, but I see zero utility to a FFP scope for long range precision shooting. Maybe if I was shooting PRS or similar, but I don't do that. I never mind having to work at a set magnification if I want my turrets to be synched to my reticle. YMMV, of course.
I have had a NP_R1 and like it.I prefer the NP-R2 or NP-R1. They are quite similar and I like them both.
Lloyd