• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Which barrel profile would act stiffer?

Which do you think will produce the lowest POI shift and greatest overall accuracy?

  • light palma

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • light varmint

    Votes: 22 51.2%
  • standard palma

    Votes: 22 51.2%

  • Total voters
    43
So I ran the analysis, the dimensions of the chamber complicates the calculation but since the first 1.75" of the barrels is the same and both are mated to and supported by the receiver in that length I think can safely remove it from the comparison analysis.

After that only the neck area of the brass is strange but it is close enough to bore dimension and is present on both so again for comparison purposes think it can be eliminated and we can have a strait bore dimension for the comparison calculation. Only the exterior dimension needs to vary for our comparison to yield an accurate result.

If you want to do these comparisons yourself you can boil it down to a cross section view and use center of mass of right trapezoids and area of right trapezoids to do calculations for any barrel profile.




Assuming assumptions and my calculations are correct the other items in cantilever beam rigidity are the same for both so we don't actually care what those number are if we only want to know which is stiffer. The light Palma barrel has a 1.3% higher total moment of inertia.

EDIT: INCORRECT ROUNDING ERRORS BUILT UP AND CHANGED VALUES SLIGHTLY. The LV is .15-.5% stiffer than the LP but its 6-7% heavier.

Since they are the same length and material all the other factors drop out and LP should actually act very slightly stiffer despite being almost 7% lighter. This is only a model of course but with everyone who has had both saying they are similar its nice to see that the model also puts them so close together.

A good rule of thumb for barrel profiles with these models is if you are waffling between two profiles of similar weight, the one that's thicker at the muzzle should be stiffer in the model.

Unless someone else wants to check my work I will be going with light Palma or standard Palma depending on how much weight I want on the gun.

Thanks guys.
 

Attachments

  • 20211019_002850.jpg
    20211019_002850.jpg
    241.6 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:
I'm not at home until the weekend. Also I have a 2001 Cherokee with a cracked flex plate that needs replacing. Thats probably going to need to happen first.
Well its not a cracked flex plate. Well at least not alone, retaining bolts are tight. Small metal bits floating in oil pan. Rod knock or piston slap is likely. Assuming rod knock as the sound was louder on the underside of the motor right near the torque converter. Going to get a junk yard motor and rebuild it over the winter. I'll replace the rod bearings in the mean time to see if that quiets her down in the interim.

And BTW after building the methodology for the first barrel the process of calculating a "relative" moment of inertia for any barrel is really fast. Like 2-3 minutes fast.
 
Well its not a cracked flex plate. Well at least not alone, retaining bolts are tight. Small metal bits floating in oil pan. Rod knock or piston slap is likely. Assuming rod knock as the sound was louder on the underside of the motor right near the torque converter. Going to get a junk yard motor and rebuild it over the winter. I'll replace the rod bearings in the mean time to see if that quiets her down in the interim.

And BTW after building the methodology for the first barrel the process of calculating a "relative" moment of inertia for any barrel is really fast. Like 2-3 minutes fast.
You alluded to Lilja a few posts back. Here's his barrel weight and stiffness calculator. It's pretty simple and spits out a relative number regarding stiffness. I guess he could call it "barrel stiffness for dummies", like me. :)
I've also made a fixture that I screw the barrel into and put the fixture in a vise. I then hang a weight at the muzzle end and measure deflection with a dial indicator. Ultimately, it gives usable data, as do your calculations and Lilja's software.

Juist download the program and plug in the barrel dimensions.

 
Last edited:
You alluded to Lilja a few posts back. Here's his barrel weight and stiffness calculator. It's pretty simple and spits out a relative number regarding stiffness. I guess he could call it "barrel stiffness for dummies", like me. :)

Juist download the program and plug in the barrel dimensions.

Nice, that makes quantitative comparisons between different lengths very easy. Mine was a short cut method that only works to compare barrels of the same length.

A fine addition to my collection.
 
Last edited:
Nice, that make quantitative comparisons between different lengths very easy. Mine was a short cut method that only works to compare barrels of the same length.

A fine addition to my collection.
I didn't see your reply before I added to my post about measuring muzzle deflection with a dial indicator. Just another way to the same end.
 
You do realize that no matter what calculations you make, or what barrel is stiffer or not, that you are still going to have to tune your load to the harmonics of that particular barrel I assume.
I have seen wide nodes on everything from a pencil barrel to a straight barrel.
I think you are continuing to over think this
 
You do realize that no matter what calculations you make, or what barrel is stiffer or not, that you are still going to have to tune your load to the harmonics of that particular barrel I assume.
I have seen wide nodes on everything from a pencil barrel to a straight barrel.
I think you are continuing to over think this
Amen
 
You do realize that no matter what calculations you make, or what barrel is stiffer or not, that you are still going to have to tune your load to the harmonics of that particular barrel I assume.
I have seen wide nodes on everything from a pencil barrel to a straight barrel.
I think you are continuing to over think this
Yes individual barrels vary. That statement while true doesn't give anyone any information that can help them make a decision.

I think you're overthinking about the amount of thinking I do.

I'll post an excel file here later with the comparison tool I made.
 
Yes individual barrels vary. That statement while true doesn't give anyone any information that can help them make a decision.
I'll post an excel file here later with the comparison tool I made.
With all due courtesy, your analysis and spreadsheet isn't going to give anyone any information worth looking at either. You have received a lot of good advice and suggestions from the forum. The fact that you are not willing to consider that expert advice does not make your calculations any more relevant by putting them in excel.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,830
Messages
2,204,053
Members
79,148
Latest member
tsteinmetz
Back
Top