• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

When to throw in the towel on a new build.

Greetings all.

I'm about to throw in the towel on my new build. It isn't even all that new anymore. The thing just won't shoot to my satisfaction. After over 500 disappointing rounds, I give up.

I thought I knew what I was doing when I spec'd this out. I wanted something in a 6.5mm. I'd read stuff about different choices in that caliber and decide on a 260 AI of sorts. I say it that way because its not a plane jane 260 AI. Its more of a 6.5mm-08, Imp., 40 deg. shoulder. 260 AI is easier to say. I had this PT&G reamer ground with a .296 neck. I use Lapua 260 brass and that gives me .002 clearance with a loaded round. I realize that doesn't give much room for crud so I try to keep necks and chamber squeaky clean. The freebore is long, .188. For comparison, if you were to order the 260 AI reamer that Midway sells you'd get a .298 neck, .060 freebore (PT&G print # 30219). A 140 gr. Berger HPBT-LR just touches the lands at an overall cartridge length of 3.085 inches. The Berger 140 gr. VLD touches the lands at 3.000 inches. Likewise, a 142 gr. MK touches at 2.954 inches. This long freebore does a couple of things for me. It keeps the tail end of the bullet out of the case and leaves room for powder. It also keeps the bearing surface of the bullet ahead of the shoulder/neck junction so as to avoid any interference with possible doughnuts created during the fire forming process. That was the plan anyway. What else this particular chambering does for me I'm not certain. I have second thoughts about it now.

I used my single shot action that came with my Savage F/TR for the foundation. It had proven to be very reliable in the factory F/TR stock with the 30 inch, 308 barrel even after 3000 rounds.

I ordered a 26 in Brux barrel with an 8 twist in the same contour as the F/TR barrel so I would be able swap barrels into the same stock. This barrel was finished to 25.5 inches. My 308, 260 AI and 223 AI are all the same contour.

After realizing how much I missed shooting the F/TR I ordered a new McMillan A-5 for the 260 AI. It came fully inletted and fits like a glove. I was a little surprised, and happily so, that this was more of a push-in fit rather than a drop-in fit. I haven't done any bedding yet, but probably will in the near future. Although, I don't think bedding is my problem. This has shot just as poor in either the F/TR or A-5 stock.

The scope I use is a NF NXS 12-42 56mm with an NP-R1 reticle mounted on an EGW 20 MOA base using EGW rings as well. I've shot this scope mounted over my 223 AI and had no problems with it. I've got a NF 12-42 BR, CH-3, on the 223 AI now, same mount setup. I'm confident in my rings, bases and scopes.

As I mentioned, the factory Savage 308 barrel is as good, or better, than one could expect for an off-the-shelf rifle barrel. At my last trip to the range with it before I disassembled it, I halfheartedly put my last 20 rounds of 175 gr. MK's through the chronograph and into the 100 yard target. More clover leaves reminded me why Its not much of a challenge to shoot at 100 yard targets. This was my powder-puff load, about 2650 IIRC. When I ordered the barrel for the 260 AI build, I ordered a barrel for my Savage Mod. 12 LRPV at the same time. I'd replace the factory 26 inch, 9 twist barrel, chambered in 223 Rem. with an 8 twist barrel of the same length and had it chambered it in 223 AI. This was a repeater/DBM target action and the plan was to end up with a nice little varmint rifle. I put the big BR scope on it initially just to get it dialed in. I was astonished at how it shot an 80.5 gr. Berger. As an experiment I took some ammo I'd loaded up on the Dillon 550 for my Mini-14. This was unsorted mixed brass with some 55 gr. SPSX's. This is not precision ammo. The Mini will eat anything. Still, I was shooting great at 200 yards, fire forming all the way. Best group of the day was ¾ inch, center to center. It makes me hesitate to take off the BR scope.

The reason I bring up my other two rifles in describing my problems with my 260 AI is for reference. It shoots so bad compared to them it makes me think something is wrong, obviously. A good group of five shots for this rifle is at best around 1 ½ inches at 200 yards. I'd say an average group is more like 2". I've tried several different bullet and powder combinations and seating depth variations. Any were just as bad as the next. I've measured loads from 2770 to 2960 fps. with the 139 gr. to 142 gr. sized bullets, it doesn't seem to matter. Lately I've been trying 123 gr. bullets too. I thought that may make a difference. No. I bought QuickLoad to try to help me out. While I'm still learning QL, I'm not doing any better.

There has got to be something I can do different. I have looked over, studied, my load logbook, chrono results, old targets, and come to the conclusion that the barrel is the most likely suspect. Right or wrong I have another one on order. It should be ready to install in a couple of weeks.

I shoot a lot. Probably 100 rounds a week of some kind or another, if not more. This just isn't fun. If anybody has suggestions, or ideas, or opinions, or a magic wand I can borrow…

Any help would be appreciated.

Thx

B
 
An improved 260 is the right capacity for your bullets.
I wouldn't have gone so short with the barrel though. Hope the crown is PERFECT.

What's your powder & ~140 seating tried so far?
What kind of ES are you reading with a chosen load?
Have you changed primers yet?
 
Do you have access to a bore scope? A friend had similar problems with a new build, he was sure the barrel was clean, upon inspection we found it to be badly copper fouled,
Gary Eliseo
 
A good friend of mine that is a good gunsmith told me one time that he learned alot of things the hard way...he had purchased a savage varminter in 204ruger and shot it a little...did decent around .3 to .4 inch groups at 100yrds...he then decided to pull the barrel and put on a hart...appox $300 later and several months of waiting for the barrel...the new 204 ruger shot .3 to .4 inch groups at 100yrds....he just laughed and said...sometimes you just never know until you try...all that work and the gun shot the exact same...although this is not always the case in every gun...sometimes you do have bad barrels and sometimes you spend money and end up in the same exact spot...just thought it would give u a laugh...maybe help ease the stress...good luck on your next barrel
 
Try using a couple smaller size bushings. I had the same problem. My groups would look like the action wasn't bedded (even though it was). As soon as I used smaller bushings my groups became consistent. I am now shooting on average 1" groups at 300yds.
 
Having had similar experiences with a new 6.5 build I went back to the basics. I restarted my efforts with a 140gr flat based spitzer bullet(Speer) loaded at a modest velocity in the 2650-2700fps range. I went to medium 4350 powders. I spent some time working up a sub .5 moa load at 100yds. At that point I moved to VLDs and higher velocity loads. I had at least established that the build would shoot satifactory groups with vanilla loads before I started with higher pressure, higher velocity ,higher BC bullet loads. Those .5 moa vanilla loads gave me a starting point and faith that the build could perform. Good luck.
 
I never could get my .260 imp to shoot the 140 class bullets even though that's what it was throated for. The 120 class bullets shoot better, but I don't see top accuracy because the throat is wrong for those bullets. Had to turn it into a super accurate hunting rifle because it is an honest .3"-.4" gun, but that won't cut it for a competition gun.

Your doing the right thing by giving up on that barrel, bullets and time are too valuable to waste on a barrel that won't cut it. It's NO FUN using half your effective barrel life just to get it to shoot decent.
 
Try to get access to a bore scope to ensure everything is OK inside the barrel, chamber, and throat area as far as cleanliness. You may have hard carbon fouling. Then as suggested try less or more neck tension. My 6.5X47L no turn neck is a loaded .290 in a .292 chamber and i use a .289 bushing. Also what primer are you running? I recently was just pulling my hair out on a .223AI build and had over 225 rounds thru it. Tried 5 different powders shot in an OCW test and various seating depths, nothing worked until I changed from 205 primers to BR-4's. It really woke it up. I was always dead set for the last 20 years on Fed. primers for .223 class and they did not work in this particular rifle.

Frank
 
You're right Frank, the primer can't be assumed away.
I think you ran into this because of your particular striker setting. That an adjustment to it would have brought it around to another primer's favor.
 
Billch - I feel your pain :'(

Went to great lengths on a 6BRX build with the best that money could buy - 500 rounds later, several projectile types, powders, primers, neck tension etc I gave up pulled the barrel & replaced with another the same spec. You wouldn't have believed it was the same rifle - went from barn door to tackdriver. The barrel maker couldn't work that one out :o
 
When you borescope the barrel, look for obvious fouling or manufacturing problems, as others have said, but look very carefully at the throat & lead. I have had 2 or 3 barrels by quality makers over the years that have a high land in them, which guides the reamer off center & gives you a skewed lead. This is never good for accuracy.
 
I started off my load development using H4350 and H4831sc. Lately I've been experimenting with Ramshot Hunter and RL-17.
A few months ago I tried some 140 gr. VLD's. I have not tested them with anything other than H4831sc. None of the of the following loads produced good groups.

Berger 140gr. Target VLD
OAL 3.020 (2.354 to ogive) This is .020 into the lands.
47.5gr. H4831sc
Lapua brass
CCI BR-2
Four 5 shot stings, averaged.
Av 2850 fps., ES-19, SD-6

Berger 140gr. HPBT-LR
OAL 3.010 (2.300 to ogive, .075 off lands)
46.2gr. H4350
Lapua brass
CCI BR-2
Av. 2863 fps., ES-11, SD-2

Sierra 142gr. MK
OAL 2.924 (2.319 to ogive, .030 off lands)
46gr. H4350
Lapua brass
CCI BR-2
Two 5 shot strings, averaged.
Av. 2876 fps., ES-15, SD-8


Hunting for a magic OAL hasn't been doing me any good. After that realization I have been loading everything at .020 off the lands. I figured I could get something close and then adjust seating depth for fine tuning. With Hunter and 142 gr. MK's at 200 yards I loaded up five groups , 5 rounds each from 45.8 gr. to 47.8 gr., CCI 250, seated to .020 off the lands and tried to come up with something with the OCW round robin method. The most favorable charge was 47 gr. Later, I loaded up 5 more groups, varying the seating depth of each group by .003, with .020 off as the control. The control group did the best. It just went from bad to worse from there. Average MV around 2830, ES's were about 20.

At this point I decide to take it to the top. Something I'd done with my F/TR shortly after I got it was to find were the maximum safe charge was for my rifle. I loaded the bullets I wanted to use, gradually increasing the powder until I was seeing pressure signs. This would be the limit to which I could work under to find the best load. It worked out fine. Turns out my best loads are comfortably under the max for the F/TR. My bullet of choice for this experiment was the 140 gr. Berger LR, Hunter the powder, kicked off with a Fed. 215MM. I started at 47.2 gr. and winced and flinched my way up. 48.3 gr. is as high as anybody in there right mind would ever want to go. I got some light ejector marks with a couple at 48.5 gr. I didn't fire any more of those.

***DO NOT ATTEMPT THIS LOAD***
140 HPBT-LR
48.3 gr. Ramshot Hunter
Fed. 215MM
3.065 OAL (.020 off lands)
5 SHOT AV. 2969
ES 21
SD 9

I did a similar exercise with a 123 gr. MK and RL-17, same primers. Seating .020 off the lands put my OAL at 2.945. Group one, Av. 3147, ES-13, SD-5.3. Group two, Av. 3145, ES-21, SD-9.8. Both group results are with 46.3 gr. The ES and SD's go down as I increased the load from 45.5 to 46.3 gr. Still, I'm not sure I'm comfortable here, so I stopped with no pressure signs. DON'T TRY THIS LOAD. The same load with 45.5 gr. of powder got horrible extreme spreads with a decrease in speed of about 15 to 20 fps.

My primer choice has evolved to the Federal 215MM. I think I can see a drop in ES and SD's. In any case, they aren't making things worse. I hate brass prep right now. I spend a lot of time on brass, something I haven't done so much in the past. With the effort I put in to my cases you'd think I was going to a championship match. As I indicated, with such little tolerance at the neck I pay special attention in that area. One thing that has remained constant in my load development is the neck bushing size. I've always used a .293. I suppose I could give something else a try, I've got some.

I clean my rifle after every range session regardless of how many rounds I put through it. Copper fouling has crossed my mind. I've run some copper cleaner down the bore just to see what would show up. Patches came out pretty clean with very little sign of copper. Without a bore scope its hard to really know. A guy I see at the range all the time has one, I think I need to ask him to give my barrel a look-see. He's offered, I'm going to take him up on it.

I'll be on rifle shooting hiatus until after the middle of July. There's work going on at the range. I do think that some shooting out to 300 yards may be in order. My dismal results at one and two hundred yards have taken the pep out this project.

Thanks
 
Oh my. You sound like me and my friend Mackie. We both had 260AI's built. He used a Stiller and I used a Remington action. Our stocks and bedding are #1. I have changed my brake once and today, with just over 500 rods and 8 months of constant testing...I got some hope.

Same with Mackie.

My hope resulted with 47.3 gr. of Reloader 22 and 140 SST's or 140 A-Max and using CCI 250 promers. In the past every Berger, Sierra and others I tried went poo. Both of have Krieger 5 R barrels with lots of frustration through them.

My solution today was BIG JUMP on the SST's - .040 or greater. NO jump with the A-Max. Mackie had his chamber re-cut and the crown changed. I know his new chamber has less leade but not sure what else he did.

Today we shot together and actually had those .2" group smiles.

Try Reloader 22 or MRP, if you can get it. Jam and/or jump a lot. Try mag primers. Try prayer.

I'm thinking the 260 AI is a fussy case and more trouble than it's worth.
 
In my 60 years of experience shooting, working on and loading for rifles it's usually the rifle and not the load.

Work on the rifles bedding, bore, ignition and crown.

For instance I read some comment above that a 260 ai might be difficult to make accurate.

No!

It's usually the rifle and not the load. The 260 'whatever' is just another cartridge. It will shoot about like others.
 
Bore scope it. Cut the necks for .0035 clearance. Seat so that the marks are a little shorter than wide, and use at least .003 neck tension. Try a slightly faster powder even thought is does not fill the case as well.

Also, if you would have loaded at the range, I believe that you wold have been able to get to the point that you are at with significantly fewer rounds fired. When I do my first test of a load, I shoot two shots fast over flags, and if I believe that the condition held for both, and I shot it well, I take the results seriously. If it looks bad, with two, three or more won't make it better. Of course if it looks worthy, I test with more shots per group. Using this method, I have helped several friends sort out hunting rifles in a day.

I have not shot this caliber, but these are the things that I would try.
Boyd
 
I'm a little late but, had to snicker @ 40X's ans. ??? I had same mind set re: 205/ 205m. Used'em in a 6.5X47L build recently. Got NO WHERE! begrudgingly switched to br-4's as last resort & suddenly started shooting bug holes. Prior to this you couldn't pay me to use CCI's. ................... Stubborn is as stubborn does ?
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,274
Messages
2,214,911
Members
79,496
Latest member
Bie
Back
Top