ssv1761982
Silver $$ Contributor
Thinking about getting a barrel for my Savage in 22-250 Ackley. I think I want to stick with 55gr bullets. Would 8 or 9 twist be too much?
ssv1761982 said:Thinking about getting a barrel for my Savage in 22-250 Ackley. I think I want to stick with 55gr bullets. Would 8 or 9 twist be too much?
benchracer said:Bryan Litz has established a tested G1 bc of .338 for the 69 SMK. If you plug that number, along with a bullet length of .900, into the twist calculator on the Berger website, the corrected bc falls into a range at or below the bc for a 53 VMAX. With RL-17, my accuracy load launches the 53 VMAX @ 3900ish. Plug the numbers for both bullets into a ballistic calculator and you will see that drift numbers are virtually identical, while the VMAX shoots considerably flatter.
ackleyman II said:[...] If you want a fast twist, then put a short throat in the chamber you may be screwed with long bullets like the 75g. If you throat it long, then want to shoot the 55g you are screwed because these bullets DO NOT LIKE TO JUMP!
JAnderson94 said:benchracer, how has RL-17 been for barrel life for you and ease of cleaning (i.e. powder residue/build up)? have a few pounds left over from a 308 that I was thinking about using up in my ackley.
CatShooter said:benchracer said:Bryan Litz has established a tested G1 bc of .338 for the 69 SMK. If you plug that number, along with a bullet length of .900, into the twist calculator on the Berger website, the corrected bc falls into a range at or below the bc for a 53 VMAX. With RL-17, my accuracy load launches the 53 VMAX @ 3900ish. Plug the numbers for both bullets into a ballistic calculator and you will see that drift numbers are virtually identical, while the VMAX shoots considerably flatter.
That is an unproven "theory" of Bryan's.
There are thousands of people over the years that have tested bullets at long range for the military and bullet companies. These guys have more equipment that you can tote in a truck... and no one has ever reported differences in drop in BC because of twist.
benchracer said:CatShooter said:benchracer said:Bryan Litz has established a tested G1 bc of .338 for the 69 SMK. If you plug that number, along with a bullet length of .900, into the twist calculator on the Berger website, the corrected bc falls into a range at or below the bc for a 53 VMAX. With RL-17, my accuracy load launches the 53 VMAX @ 3900ish. Plug the numbers for both bullets into a ballistic calculator and you will see that drift numbers are virtually identical, while the VMAX shoots considerably flatter.
That is an unproven "theory" of Bryan's.
There are thousands of people over the years that have tested bullets at long range for the military and bullet companies. These guys have more equipment that you can tote in a truck... and no one has ever reported differences in drop in BC because of twist.
You have a strange definition of both "unproven" and "theory". Mr. Litz isn't given to throwing around opinions. He performs tests and lets the data tell the tale. His "theory" is based on hard data generated while testing the effects of twist on bc. Testing done by others, such as Michael Courtney, have mirrored Mr. Litz's results.
Of the supposed "thousands" of others who have never noticed this phenomenon, how many were specifically testing twist effects on bc, and how were they modeling bc?
You obviously have an opinion. Mr. Litz's "theory" is backed by hard data and corroborated by other testing. I will take hard data over an opinion any day of the week.
onelastshot said:I've been looking at a 22-250 as well, a Cooper model 21. I'm told the factory twist is 1-14, just wondering why Cooper would choose a 14 twist if it can't stabilize even mid-weight bullets? I don't want to make a $2,000 mistake.