FNSafari
Gold $$ Contributor
I simply think Remington was competing against Winchester and others and came up with the simple to make, cheaply finished 721/722 series, and ultimately the 700. The extractor on the 721/722 actions was a weak point and god help you if you break one and don't have a replacement. In the end they accomplished what tons of folks wanted...a cheaper hunting rifle that was accurate. Many of those folks just weren't in tune with the finer firearms available and most prolly couldn't afford it. No criticism, just fact of life for many.Remington ushered in the demise of the Winchester Mod.70 with effective cost cutting and good advertisement. Their offering was accurate and well finished, easy to rebarrel and proved the darling of the accuracy community.
I'll get flamed for this but the extractor is a weak point and the trigger could've been improved on. Ejection works against accuracy. CNC machining was great for straight actions but finishing costs money and unions are a detriment to production. You can't time actions with labor that can't understand what they're working on between breaks.
Remington suffered from one bad management decision too many and got the same treatment they gave Winchester years ago. I hope they bring it back with some refinements that actually enhance it rather than just screw it up.
Regarding a 721/722 being well finished, well I guess you can't say they were roughly finished, but they were just a cheap to make design and they look it. They are good functional rifles though. I still have two and getting the barrels clean is a chore and when I borescoped them I now know why....lots of tool marks and roughness. But for roughly 79 bucks back then what should anyone expect?