Great thread. Just curious why the creedmoor has not gained some traction in the short game given it equates if not slightly exceeds the 6.5x47 velocity?
Give it some time my friend, give it some time..Great thread. Just curious why the creedmoor has not gained some traction in the short game given it equates if not slightly exceeds the 6.5x47 velocity?
I'd suggest that beginners avoid reinventing the wheel. There is plenty of good, solid knowledge in these forums on how to get a 284 or Dasher to shoot well. Going bigger or faster than what most of us do right now invites problems with recoil control and fatigue. Going smaller (at long range) hasn't worked out to the point of seeing them in the winner's circle.
If reinventing the wheel is your thing, save yourself some money, get a copy of Quickload and do some research on OBT. With those two, you shouldHow many are still shooting the 7mm 195 EOL?
I'd suggest that beginners avoid reinventing the wheel. There is plenty of good, solid knowledge in these forums on how to get a 284 or Dasher to shoot well. Going bigger or faster than what most of us do right now invites problems with recoil control and fatigue. Going smaller (at long range) hasn't worked out to the point of seeing them in the winner's circle.
If reinventing the wheel is your thing, save yourself some money, get a copy of Quickload and do some research on OBT. With those two, you should be able to generally predict the accuracy node velocities for a new bullet or bullet/cartridge combination. Armed with that knowledge, you can re-run your ballistic comparisons to see if your new super-bullet will be worth the barrel life to test and load develop. Point in case: How many are still shooting the 7mm 195 EOL?
Great thread. Just curious why the creedmoor has not gained some traction in the short game given it equates if not slightly exceeds the 6.5x47 velocity?
Think about this.. Couple that 152 Matrix with a .260A.I., 6.5 x 55 IMP Swede OR, what I am going for, a 6.5 x 284 pushing that bullet well OVER 2900! Methinks that the Matrix, 147 Hornady A-Max and the 150 SMk's will do exceedingly well at 1000. Just give them some time to catch on..I been working on the same thought process. I shoot a 6.5 x 47 and 284 Shehane. During the last long range match in October I shot the entire match using my 6.5 x 47 using the new 152 Matrix VLD and competed right alongside the 284's. After the end of the second day of shooting I was only 1 point down from the group of 284's then had to withdraw do to a family emergency on the last relay. These 152's with a BC over .700 when pointed will compete against the 180's!! A lot less recoil to absorb, barrels should last longer, and the cost to operate is lower!! My velocity was 2722 fps from the 6.5 x 47 Lapua.
Interesting discussion and I, too, agree with your thinking on mid-range.
For the group's consideration . . . The long range game seems open to more options, given the powders and the excellent bullets that we have available these days. I'm eagerly awaiting a return to sane temperatures so I can start evaluating the 150 gr. Sierra 6.5 in my 6.5-284. That combination may prove to be a game changer, as ShootDots has said. On the other hand, some of the larger 6mm chamberings can produce some very interesting numbers. For example, a .243 AI can easily achieve 3,300 fps+ with a 105 Hybrid using RL-26. Assuming one can develop a load of sufficient accuracy around this velocity figure, that 6mm 105 actually outperforms a 6.5mm Hybrid at 3,075 fps. A 115 at a modestly lower velocity also produces trajectory and wind drift numbers that are better than the 6.5 140 gr. Hybrid.
The .243 AI is a pussycat on the shoulder in a 15 lb. rifle. The same can be said for the 6mm Rem AI, and the 6 AI will produce even more velocity with today's powders.
Just throwing this out for consideration. I love my .260 AIs and my 6.5-284, but I think I would be making a mistake if I didn't think long and hard about the larger capacity 6mms for F Open. I have a .243 AI rig that happens to shoot the 105 Hybrids extremely well with 48.8 gr. of RL-26 (3,307 fps avg.) and I wouldn't consider myself handicapped at all with this combination at 1,000.
Great times we live in, eh?
Happy New Year!
Well line out all your thinking about F-Open or F-T/R and how far you shoot etc..etc.. and see what replies you get! It may help you decide!I want a new barrel for 2018... I havent decided on a caliber though 100%
Im about 60% sold on running a straight 284. Been shooting a 6XC for 500 yard F class since I started last year.
At our club FTR is more competitive than open. Thought about a 308 for 200 20x berger too since I shoot f open - FTR style with a bipod.
Other ideas floating around in my head though too...
My son set a junior record at 1000 yards of 200-16X with the 6.5x47L, still stands. In low winds, the 6.5 cartridges are awesome...Has either the 6.5x47 or the 260AI set any national records in any of the long range sports?
CW
I want a new barrel for 2018... I havent decided on a caliber though 100%
Im about 60% sold on running a straight 284. Been shooting a 6XC for 500 yard F class since I started last year.
At our club FTR is more competitive than open. Thought about a 308 for 200 20x berger too since I shoot f open - FTR style with a bipod.
Other ideas floating around in my head though too...
Scott that is plain BadAss congrats to your son and to you for keeping him interested in the sport.My son set a junior record at 1000 yards of 200-16X with the 6.5x47L, still stands. In low winds, the 6.5 cartridges are awesome...
284 Shehane, but she has a 7mm-300WSM itch ...pretty sure that is going to end in failureAsk Scott what his wife shoots. The point is that unless you have an inability to shoot what wins most of the time, it might be a good idea to copy them.
I agree with the lighter cartridges in lighter or consistent winds. They are easier to get to shoot really pretty, small groups.