They have exclusive selling rights.
As raroin said above, it depends on what your chamber was cut for. Based on my collection of unfired 284 brass, at approximately the 0.200 line they measure:
My unturned necks loaded measured:
- Winchester: 0.4960
- Norma: 0.4971
- Lapua: 0.4983
- Peterson: 0.4989
There is quite a difference dimensional between them. I have one reamer for the WW and Lapua brass and one for the Peterson and Norma. I have no complaints with the WW brass. It is not as uniform as the others but it still shoots well and holds up fine. I have had over a dozen firings before retiring the barrel/brass and it has held up pretty well. Id say I culled about 5% due to loose pockets.
- WW: 0.3140
- Norma: 0.3151
- Lapua: 0.3126
- Peterson: 0.3163
I am now moving to try Peterson.
That’s Norma 284 brassWhatever happened with the 284 brass Shiraz (Grizzly.com) was having made a few years ago? Didn’t work out?
My WW/Lapua reamer has a 0.318 neck. I clean up the necks on WW and Lapua has shot fine out of it with no attention. My freebore is 0.235" A freebore of 0.250 should be great for 180+.Great data - was going with .318 neck and 250 fb for heavies in a Shehane, planning to neck up Lapua. Now considering the Peterson... would I need to turn necks a bit if I stick with that reamer?
It is good brass but, as mentioned, many reamers have the base dimension ground for brass about .001” wider at the .200” datum to shoot Lapua brass. The Norma brass once expanded to this chamber dimension will retain that diameter even after fl sizing and produce heavy ‘clickers’ upon extraction. A small base die helps but I still had the issue with probably 1/5 cases fired at 2800-2820fps with 180-184 hybrids. I should have realized the difference in base diameter before specifying my reamer. That one is on meWhatever happened with the 284 brass Shiraz (Grizzly.com) was having made a few years ago? Didn’t work out?