I’ll start saying without a doubt, sorting can work.
Honestly, no one can tell you if it works. You have to try for yourself. Set your own standard of success. Do you hope to shrink group size by 10%, eliminate a single flyer per box, keep all shots on a 1” swinger at 50 yards using bargin in a bucket ammo.
The rifle comes into play just as much as the ammo used. But keep a couple things in mind. You’re not likely to go to the Lapua test center, buy a brick of the best lot for your rifle, and a pallet of the worst, then sort through worst and get more than a box that shoots as good as the lot that tested the best.
I have spent a lot of time sorting 22 shorts, simply because match ammo is not made any more. Using CCI Target, I was able to reduce group size to about 40% of non sorted of the same case of ammo. 5” groups down to under 2” at 50 yards with iron sights. Any thing can help an 29 grain bullet at 700 fps is appreciated.
Armed with that confidence, I sorted some Lapua Biathlon X for another rifle. Complete waste of time.
While you’re weighing, measuring rims and engraved depth, don’t forget concentricity. If you’re really bold you might try annealing necks.
Something that’s free to try, is save your brass from batches you’ve sorted. Clean it after shooting then weigh it again. Does it still fall within your plus/minus window of sorted ammo?
Again, sorting can work, set reasonable expectations based on the ammo you’re working with. The question boils down to Are your tools, skills, and attention to detail better than the factory that produced the ammo? You’ve just hired on as the quality control department.