bozo699
Gold $$ Contributor
Oh God yeah!…I think everyone that’s gonna get it already got it…
1+1=5. You’re right.
Wayne
Oh God yeah!…I think everyone that’s gonna get it already got it…
1+1=5. You’re right.
It's not??I think
1+1=5.
Two good friends of mine took their 7mags with 180 Eldm's to Africa. Their guide was a bit skeptical. After they're taking the full gamut of plains game with them including Zebra, all with one shot kills, the guide wasn't skeptical anymore. Just stay on the medium to heavy for caliber options. They do the job nicely.There is a YouTube channel dedicated to hunting with target bullets. Gel tests galore and autopsies on animals. Eldm was a good one. Been a while, but I think TGK was good too. Id pick a ttsx or similar for an elk, but deer and pigs drop with a .223 easily, why not a eldm from a big gun?
Seems the term "hunting bullet" is used too universally. Anything can be called that by any manufacturer. The truth is there are some target bullets that probably hold together better than some bullets touted as "hunting" bullets". If a bullet is to fail - it will most likely be a thin jacket cup and core bullet. While there are some popular hunting bullets of this design, most target bullets are of this design. Many just blow apart, jackets separate on impact and with nothing left to hold the lead together. The lead fragments when striking anything hard since there is no jacket holding it all together. I guess we all have our own ideas of what constitutes a hunting bullet, let alone a good one. In my mind, a "true" hunting bullet would be one which is capable of holding enough weight together to continue penetrating when striking bone - regardless of whether it is of a "Barnes" type - or a leaded which is bonded, heavier jacket, etc.. Even then - the performance differs wildly between those designs. For thin-skinned small eastern deer, for example, a well placed broadside shot from a cup and core that disintegrates into the shallow vitals might be a speedier death than a through and through with a Barnes. The same shot with a frontal or angling shot might result in a lost animal. And I think that is what makes some of the bullets better than others - being up to the task when the shot is not perfect or on thicker-bodied animals - whichever design it is.What is a hunting bullet? What does it do specifically?
Perfectly statedSeems the term "hunting bullet" is used too universally. Anything can be called that by any manufacturer. The truth is there are some target bullets that probably hold together better than some bullets touted as "hunting" bullets". If a bullet is to fail - it will most likely be a thin jacket cup and core bullet. While there are some popular hunting bullets of this design, most target bullets are of this design. Many just blow apart, jackets separate on impact and with nothing left to hold the lead together. The lead fragments when striking anything hard since there is no jacket holding it all together. I guess we all have our own ideas of what constitutes a hunting bullet, let alone a good one. In my mind, a "true" hunting bullet would be one which is capable of holding enough weight together to continue penetrating when striking bone - regardless of whether it is of a "Barnes" type - or a leaded which is bonded, heavier jacket, etc.. Even then - the performance differs wildly between those designs. For thin-skinned small eastern deer, for example, a well placed broadside shot from a cup and core that disintegrates into the shallow vitals might be a speedier death than a through and through with a Barnes. The same shot with a frontal or angling shot might result in a lost animal. And I think that is what makes some of the bullets better than others - being up to the task when the shot is not perfect or on thicker-bodied animals - whichever design it is.