TotallyYou will need 1:9 twist.
I have a lot of experience shooting 20 caliber. I recommend a cartridge with more powder capacity to shoot the 55's.
e much, in my opinion. If you want to shoot 55 gn Bergers in a 20 cal, go to a larger 20 cal cartridge, say a 20-2 50 or such.I've got a new barrel coming and I'm wondering how much I'd gain by having the barrel throated for the 55gr Bergers.
If the reamer is to SAAMI specs., perhaps noting to gain: free-bore is already 0.100", with a 1.5 Deg. (1 Deg-30 Min.) leade angle, and a .217" long neck. The SAAMI free-bore is a LOT for bullet lengths in the 35-40 Gr. weight range. The SAAMI spec stipulates a Max OAL of 2.260".I've got a new barrel coming and I'm wondering how much I'd gain by having the barrel throated for the 55gr Bergers.
It is unless you step up to a BR size case, only thing smaller that i would consider is a PPCAI case.I often ponder, why so many fail to realize the sweet spot for 20’s since day one has been 30-40 grain slugs ? pretty hard to beat a high bc 39-40,
I still admit to a soft spot for some 22 CF’s particularly historic ones launched out of highwalls and spent much of my youth assassinating crows and chucks with 22-250’s and various 17’s, but the, IMHO, perfect, bar none, varmint combo, is a TAC 20, firing Lapua cases with 40’s humming along @ 3900 + fps or 32’s @ 4100-4200 fps….everything else is 2nd, 3rd best…..carry on.Part of the allure of the .204 caliber is speedy bullets giving flat trajectory and "rewarding" visual terminal displays. Shooting 55gr bullets removes all that with slower speeds, arced trajectory, and lacks that "happy ending" most shooters are looking for when out varmint shooting.
Personally, all my varmint rifles shoot "correct for caliber" weight bullets for the attributes listed above. I don't distain those who shoot those heavy for caliber bullets, I just don't understand what they're trying to accomplish by doing so. There are much better choices for launching a 55gr .204 bullet.
For punching holes in paper or hitting gongs the 55 could be fine in a 204 Ruger. But for critters (especially at distances where the 55 would finally outpace a 40) the terminal performance is fairly lame. Minus high velocity the 55’s can and do pencil through with almost no expansion. I base this statement upon real-world experience.Why do people say the 204R isn't well suited for shooting the Berger 55's? Plenty of people, myself included, shoot 52-55 gr bullets in 223's and the 204 not only has more case capacity then the 223 but the Berger 55 has a much better BC.
When I run numbers through a ballistic app with a 204R shooting 55's against a 223 shooting a 53 Vmax, which has the best BC of any mid weight 22 cal bullet, even at 150fps faster then the 204R by the time you get to 300yds they're even with each other and the further you go past 300 the 204 W/55's continually pulls away in all departments.
The only real downside I can see is once you get a 204R throated properly for those longgg 55's you very well may be committed to just running the 55's because the 40's and lighter bullets may not shoot well jumping them that far.
With THAT in mind, consider going ZERO freebore on your chamber.The only real downside I can see is once you get a 204R throated properly for those longgg 55's you very well may be committed to just running the 55's because the 40's and lighter bullets may not shoot well jumping them that far.
Yep. Plenty long. They went with the Weatherby concept for freebore in the 204.It's good to hear that the factory throat is long enough.