I did hit the back button. You made a prediction. I simply ask how you came to this conclusion.If you weren't around for Watergate and Nixons fall from grace, you're in luck. History is about to repeat itself.
You're right, it is a WITCH hunt and I think they're getting pretty damn close to burning that WITCH, or would that be a WARLOCK?Texas10 I myself still think it's all still a WITCH HUNT!
If they had anything it would have been out there by now.
DELAY DELAY DELAY
Joe Salt
Sorry, Medic. I got a little testy there, needed to eat something. I apologize to you.
I wasn't making a prediction, nor drawing a conclusion. But in listening to all sides, reading the court documents and the recent errors in redacting court documents for the Southern District of New York, It's become clear to me that Mueller has had the end game in sight all along, and he has been releasing information in court filings so that his final report could not be squelched by Republican comrades in the House Judiciary Committee (no longer an issue since the midterms) or if a new AG came into play (it did). It seems to me he would do that for only one reason, and it wouldn't be because it (the report) exonerates Trump.
But the Southern District Court is an entirely different matter, and it looks way worse. They've already got a string of convictions, and apparently they're not done. And they are unfettered by the political winds in Washington.
Now tell me, cause I'm always open to new information, how does that all add up to you?
Last I knew, the Constitution and its Amendments was written by and for both parties.
Why don’t you supply us with the specifics of those “Southern District Court” convictions and how they pertain directly to our current president.Sorry, Medic. I got a little testy there, needed to eat something. I apologize to you.
I wasn't making a prediction, nor drawing a conclusion. But in listening to all sides, reading the court documents and the recent errors in redacting court documents for the Southern District of New York, It's become clear to me that Mueller has had the end game in sight all along, and he has been releasing information in court filings so that his final report could not be squelched by Republican comrades in the House Judiciary Committee (no longer an issue since the midterms) or if a new AG came into play (it did). It seems to me he would do that for only one reason, and it wouldn't be because it (the report) exonerates Trump.
But the Southern District Court is an entirely different matter, and it looks way worse. They've already got a string of convictions, and apparently they're not done. And they are unfettered by the political winds in Washington.
Now tell me, cause I'm always open to new information, how does that all add up to you?
Oh, ... a lot of us see. Question is, ... What is to be done? No easy answer. All I can posit is that the "Great Disruptor" currently in the White House is doing us all a favor in exposing both parties and ALL politicians for the charlatans and elites they actually are. Where it all goes and what happens tomorrow is unknown.But nobody sees, like the frog in the water with the temp slowly rising.
Apology accepted, no harm, no foul. I remember well the Nixon fiasco, Tricky Dick got what he had coming to him. I just don't see a correlation with then and now. If the Special Council has the goods, lets see it. They have pooped off millions of dollars just because the President doesn't fit the mold of a Washington insider. And, all I can say about that is, good for him. I'm just tired of speculation.Sorry, Medic. I got a little testy there, needed to eat something. I apologize to you.
I wasn't making a prediction, nor drawing a conclusion. But in listening to all sides, reading the court documents and the recent errors in redacting court documents for the Southern District of New York, It's become clear to me that Mueller has had the end game in sight all along, and he has been releasing information in court filings so that his final report could not be squelched by Republican comrades in the House Judiciary Committee (no longer an issue since the midterms) or if a new AG came into play (it did). It seems to me he would do that for only one reason, and it wouldn't be because it (the report) exonerates Trump.
But the Southern District Court is an entirely different matter, and it looks way worse. They've already got a string of convictions, and apparently they're not done. And they are unfettered by the political winds in Washington.
Now tell me, cause I'm always open to new information, how does that all add up to you?
Why don’t you supply us with the specifics of those “Southern District Court” convictions and how they pertain directly to our current president.
Please give us your expert opinion on how Cohen’s guilty plea re payments to Horseface differs from Edwards payments to his mistress which were held not to be illegal campaign contributions.
Actually, they were signed by both parties but the Amendments were not a part of the Constitution. They were added as an amendment to the Constitution over two years later. The first ten amendments were written by James Madison. Madison was a supporter of protecting the peoples rights against government and the then controlling body of the Federal Party. The Federal Party came into power around 1790 or '92 and was a national coalition of bankers and businessmen in support of Alexander Hamilton's fiscal policies.
The Democratic-Republican party wasn't established until later, I think around 1800 and was proposed by Thomas Jefferson and supported by Madison to opposition to Hamilton and the Federalist Party. Madison served as Jefferson's Secretary of State after Jefferson became President.
My point is, that the Democrats have never really been a big supporter of the first ten Amendments.
I wouldn't term this a "political thread". There are constitutional issues here that will directly affect our hobbies, pastimes, lifestyles and god given rights. I welcome the discourse.So much for "Just say no to political threads."