Ccrider
Gold $$ Contributor
You thinking Michelle?![]()


You thinking Michelle?![]()
You know that I was just trying to pull your leg a little, we are screwed by any politician these days.Hell no. Really hate to think about it at all. We screwed!
![]()
That's the key word.politician
No joke. I would probably buy that barrel to use instead if fighting my trashSo what did the bore look like and can I get one of those accuracy test barrels that shoots 27,000 rounds?
lol. Someone hasn’t taken a close look at what his cost per round fired is, because I guarantee it’s close to, if not over $1 per round (assuming you are firing quality bullets from a larger caliber rifle, ie .264/ .284 / .308)A dollar a round sounds expensive for handloads
As you can tell I have not bought components in awhile
That should be 1 cent per grain of powder.65 -75 cents per bullet, 10 cents per grain of powder, 14 cents per primer.
Close enough for rough calculations in the pits. But $140/1000 for primers seems really high!That should be 1 cent per grain of powder.
I couldn't get it to edit.
Just rough figuring on newly purchased (online) prices using match primers and $400 per 8# powder (shipped).Close enough for rough calculations in the pits. But $140/1000 for primers seems really high!
My expense per round
Bullet $0.64
Powder $0.007/gr ($0.31)
Primer $0.09
Brass fired 10x $0.11
$1.15/round for an F/open gun
This is trueFrankG - What was the distance they were testing at? I'm assuming it was 100yards or less?
The reason I'm asking is I've often heard that accuracy can last at short range much longer than long range, say 600 yards.