I am more a hunter than plinker or target shooter when it comes to rifles these days. I am actually just now deciding that at 250+ guns I should be toning it down. I too hate load development and if all my guns are moa up to 600 yards I am happy. Now 35% of that arsenal are pistols and shotguns and each holds their purpose as far as I am concerned about 15% are 22s and I'm just addicted to unique 22 rifles so that amount won't go down. I recently started buying some pieces as investment guns that are rather rare or unique low production models and that's about 25% so by my math I have about 65 or more center fire rifles including 22hornet, 222, 22-250, 223 (ar) 243, 257 wtby, 6.5 sweede , 6.5 CM, 270, 280, 7mm-08, 7x57, 7-30 waters, 7 mag, 308, 30-30, 30-06, 300 mag, 300wsm, 300 wtby, 32-20, 35 rem, 357, 358, 40 S&w, 44 mag.. all of these I load for and consider shooters and have used hunted with
I have just decided to part ways with my 6.5 Grendel so there's some progress
For anyone wondering I have sold and never reattempted to buy a 25-06, 338 win mag, 257ai, 6mm, 300 H&H, 300 RUM, and 30-378 wtby..I think all of these calibers are already very closely mimicked in what i have
That was my 223 or 204 debate. I have the 22-250 but the reasons the 204 stands out are, as others have said, even less recoil and muzzel blast , recoil and heat generated over the 22-250. 223 would be so simple to load for and I can shoot heavier bullets but maybe it's because I have the 222 and have previously owned a Howa 223 and 700 223 that they didn't do anything for me that I am not seriously considering one.