• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Should rimfire benchrest shooters take a hard look at “Micro-Groove” barrel technology

High Noon

Silver $$ Contributor
Last year I decided to build a 10/22 benchrest rifle so I contacted a well known precision 10/22 action maker and didn’t hear back from him so I contacted another one. Both of these companies advertised with me when I published “Small Caliber News” and I liked their precision products. Finally the first one responded and I placed an order and wouldn’t you know it a little later the second company responded as well so I couldn’t say no to either one I’ve ended up building two rimfire benchrest rifles!

The first is an true benchrest build that is still ongoing (those stock makers take forever...lol..) but this second one I decided to just kind of put it together myself. So let’s take a look at the one I just finished up putting together with various components.

The action is a precision CST and their match bolt assembly. Then I added a Kidd 3 ounce trigger. For the stock I noticed a guy offering a handsome thumb hole Hickory all finished up on one of the forums. I was surprised nobody bought it as it was very reasonable. So after a month of it reappearing I decided to help him out and buy it! It’s not a true three inch bench stock with the forend at 2 1/4” inch and I’m fully aware of the thumb hole not necessarily conducive to the best handling but I used one many years ago in centerfire benchrest with decent results. I did install my own front and rear pillars and final bedding of the stock.

So I was down to selecting a match barrel. I looked at every one I could think of and actually contacted one of the top makers with what I thought was a poor response and would not have any available until late fall. Then out of curiosity I checked on EBay for maybe a decent used barrel. What I found was a company offering “Micro-Groove” barrels for the 10/22 by the name of Keystone Sporting Arms. That immediately peaked my interest as I remember as a very young guy starting my accuracy journey with a Marlin Sako in 222 Remington with a micro-groove barrel and did it shoot!

So after a little research I decided to order one of their Ruger 10/22 Blued ( to match the CST action) .920 Bull Precision Target 20” barrels all for $129.94! I felt at that price it was worth a try and at least I could finally get a custom match 10/22 going.

It arrived priority mail in three days and I was immediately impressed with the bluing and crown. I ran an oiled patch through then a dry one so I could do a quick bore scope. I can tell you those fine “Micro-grooves” look really cool! As always with any new barrel I took it to to my shop for a very good polish lap. After cleaning I finally installed it on my custom CST action.

Finally it was time to go to my range. I set the rifle up and put up a target on my 50 yard bullet trap. My first five shot group was .527 the second group .373 the third a .107! I was tickled for sure. Now I was really starting to think about the possible advantage of the Micro-Groove barrel and the soft lead 22 bullets. Then last evening after getting out of work late I quickly went back up to my range but this time with a brand new lot of Lapua CenterX that had just arrived. This lot had recently proven very accurate in the Lapua test facility with my new Stiller 2500 and Shilen Rachet barrel.

As I fired my first three shots all were in one hole! The wind flags were lightly dancing around but continued to make no sense and it was getting dark. I decided to just shoot the remaining two rounds. At the final shot I was so relieved they all went in a ragged hole! Back down to my office with Ole Hickory ....that’s what I named it and the target. I measured it and was very pleased with a .075!

That got me to thinking all evening are we all missing something here with the old “Micro-Groove” barrel technology? Think of the possible advantages with the shallow lands and grooves with less deformation of the soft lead bullet. We know the Shilen Ratchet rifling advantages with less lead and fouling build up. Well the old Micro-Groove” technology offers something similar with their “tangentially disposed” (beveled to prevent accumulation of fouling) which enhances accuracy, ease of cleaning and elimination of gas leakage! Here is an article I found and I guess as they say nothing new under the sun!

“In 1953 Marlin applied for a patent on Microgroove rifling (US Patent #3,100,358 was granted on Aug. 13, 1953). In this patent, Microgroove rifling was described as having 5 grooves for every 1/10th of an inch bore diameter, and that the driving side of each land would be "tangentially disposed" (i.e. beveled, presumably to prevent the accumulation of fouling). On July 29, 1953, Marlin introduced Microgroove rifling in their .22 rimfire barrels, with 16 grooves that were .014" wide, and nominally .0015" deep. In their 1954 catalog, they outlined numerous advantages that this new form of rifling had, including better accuracy, ease of cleaning, elimination of gas leakage, higher velocities and lower chamber pressures. They also mentioned "...a bore of greater than standard size..." in their discussion of how Microgroove rifling did not engrave (distort) a bullet jacket as deeply as conventional rifling.”

By Glen Fryxell

So my question to all the rimfire experts is....should we take a hard look at Micro-Groove match barrels.

Sincerely,

Todd A. Kindler ( High Noon)
President- The Woodchuck Den Inc. & Founder Editor of Small Caliber News

456F5F54-3AC7-4D5C-AF9E-7DF746F8AC71.jpeg

AC783A54-D20E-44D2-A92C-487D5471A597.jpeg

34832C2F-560A-4AC2-BC3C-BF571F96035D.jpeg
 
Glenn - I don't have the knowledge or experience to respond to your question.

But, I am bowled over by a 10/22 with less than 1/2" groups at 50 yards. Less than .1? I just don't know what to say.
 
I found and ordered a barrel on ebay just for giggles. A barrel that will shoot .5 for 130.00 sounds like a deal to me. If it gets anywhere close to the posted results I will be ecstatic. WTH it's only money.

Although... I would guess that the 700.00 action and trigger might figure into the equation somewhere.... :D
 
Interesting. Need a bigger sample I suppose. If micro groove has been around since the 50’s and it’s that good why isn’t it more common? Why wouldn’t the international Olympic smallbore guys be using them? If the microgroove barrels typically shoot that good count me in, especially at $130!
 
A better question would be should rimfire shooters learn to taper lap their own barrels... probably has more to do with the accuracy than the actual land and groove form.

I find it interesting you did get those results with a barrel from keystone, same makers of the very ‘economical ‘ Cricket line of rifles. Really impressive. I have gotten similar results with Green Mountain blanks I’ve hand lapped after contouring and then finish chambering
 
Muller works Barrels makes an 8 groove that works very well. Several Rimfire BR shooters use them. I had one and liked it, just not the gun it was attached to, so I sold it. They are referred to as MIs, they are shallow rifling.
I'll likely buy another when they are available again.
 
I have been playing with a youth benchrest Cricket "KSA" with the factory micro grove barrel. Needless to say it is a interesting little rifle. Have you ever pushed a slug through yours? I have slugged this one and in no way would I consider it MI. I would actually call it very invasive. Also for me shooting that micro groove in some wind... Scary.... you had better hang on.

Bottom left slug was CCI Standard. Top Right SK RM.
 

Attachments

  • IMG-3137.jpg
    IMG-3137.jpg
    197.7 KB · Views: 323
A better question would be should rimfire shooters learn to taper lap their own barrels... probably has more to do with the accuracy than the actual land and groove form.

I find it interesting you did get those results with a barrel from keystone, same makers of the very ‘economical ‘ Cricket line of rifles. Really impressive. I have gotten similar results with Green Mountain blanks I’ve hand lapped after contouring and then finish chambering

I wish I knew how to taper lap a barrel, I think thats what makes them accurate
 
I wish I knew how to taper lap a barrel, I think thats what makes them accurate

There’s definitely a ‘feel’ to it and with rimfire barrels the use of slugs to feel things out besides. I watched Dan Muller lap a few rimfire barrels and discuss the theory as he was doing it. Very labor intensive would be an understatement. I have had excellent results lapping barrels for my own use and would suggest playing with some cheaper blanks for practice.
 
That's really an amazing target !! For only around $2K or so . . . how much of your original 10/22 is left? Some spend much more for less results ! And beautiful stock, like a work of art.
 
Fasteddie,

There are no original Ruger parts to this build, all custom parts and I have around a grand in the entire project not counting the Weaver 24 and rings. The only work I did was getting a few things sorted out on the stock, bedding two pillars front and back in place and a final stress free bedding. I also lapped and polished the Keystone barrel as I do all my barrels. It shoots exceptionally well if I do my part! Thanks everyone for the kind words!!

High Noon
 
Very interesting, and impressive groups! Looks like the KSA barrels are 12 groove 0.004” deep, whereas the Marlin microgroove is 16 groove 0.0015” deep. Not quite the same, but certainly the KSA is different than most others.
Now we can all wonder if Ruger will embrace the microgroove since they have acquired Marlin. :)
 
Last edited:
I recently read an article - I believe it was from Mr. Krieger, of Krieger barrels, as published in one of my shooting mags. He reviewed different barrel grooves and mentioned the micro-groove. Seems the shallow grooves (or just the nature of the configuration) spelled dramatically-short life for the Marlins in center-fire - though I can't recall anything negative in the rimfires.
 
It's was running joke over on rimfire central that you have to spend $K to get a 10/22 to shoot like a $250 Model 60. That of course was before Marlin's quality dropped off in the early 2000's.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,287
Messages
2,216,118
Members
79,547
Latest member
M-Duke
Back
Top