well, if'n your jus' road huntin' mebbe. howzit do offa hay bale?at 200 over the hood of a pu . Close enough
(you know i;m just poking you, right?)
well, if'n your jus' road huntin' mebbe. howzit do offa hay bale?at 200 over the hood of a pu . Close enough
I've seen it used on the OCW load development process, which 'reads' the charge ladder target based on the position of the group centers not the size of the groups.I don't understand this "Round Robin" approach...what can be learned from introducing all the extra variables ?
Alwayswell, if'n your jus' road huntin' mebbe. howzit do offa hay bale?
(you know i;m just poking you, right?)
I’m confusedTypical long range 3 shot ladders are usually 12-15 shots. They are run as a group. Probably takes about 30 seconds. Whether you shoot them as groups or as round robin, it still only takes about 30 seconds or less. I would not shoot multiple groups over a time period round robin.
Wind was 5 mph @ 100 yards shooting a 7mm SS - I dont believe wind was a factor. I am shooting from a mag, so the .090" definitely takes any OAL considerations out of the equation, but Im not opposed to loading in the .010 range either if it shows potential as I have a short throat so I can load right up to the lands and still fit the mag. I dont want to get into the lands as pulling a bullet during a hunt would be a major issue. I am going to shoot it again and see what happens.If the op's test was shot at 100 yds as I suspect then I doubt the wind is the culprit in the horizontal spread at 0.010". The vertical is about the same at 0.010" & 0.090". I would expect that a good load could be developed at either one of these seating depths. There is no information about the rifle or the use of the round, but if feeding from a magazine is an issue then 0.090" may be the better choice. If there are no magazine restrictions then it is up to the shooter. In this scenario I would probably test both seating depths to see how they develop, but I would be surprised if both were not more than adequate.