• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Scope ring torque

I avoid the need for lapping and high torque by using Burris Signature rings on all of my rifles;in addition to self-alignment, a secondary benefit is that the polymer bushings grip the scope tube very well. I've had no shift on my RPR .338 Lapua after shooting ~800 285-300 gr max loads.
 
I avoid the need for lapping and high torque by using Burris Signature rings on all of my rifles;in addition to self-alignment, a secondary benefit is that the polymer bushings grip the scope tube very well. I've had no shift on my RPR .338 Lapua after shooting ~800 285-300 gr max loads.
Those inserts serve as a work-around for lapping. Nothing but a different way to address the same alignment issue.
 
A method for loosening tight screws that I discovered by accident is to use a cordless impact driver. While working on a friend's rifle, the cross bolts on the picatinny rail were extremely tight. Using a screw driver I thought that I would strip the head of the screw or break it. The impact driver did the job in seconds.
 
I learned the hard way on scope mounting a long time ago. over tightened rings and dented a scope tube. Now I use a fat wrench and burris signature rings, warne or talleys. Never over torque those screws, just causes a lot of problems you do not need. Snug is enough 15-25 inch pounds of torque on a rimfire.
 
I cannot understand why scope manufactures still use scope rings to secure the scope.
They can easily integrate some sort of picatinny rail section on the bottom of the scope
and use a double sided clamp to attach the scope to the base or rail.
 
Tangent Theta(the $5k scope maker) recommends 15 inch pounds on their 30mm tubes. I have heard guys having trouble with the internals by going over the 15 limit. The 34mm is 25 inch pounds.
 
To clarify, I couldn't imagine that you were referring to Lapua brass since EVERY competitive shooter I know and have ever heard of anneals their brass, typically after every firing. But you were in fact, referring to Lapua brass and their published recommendation does state that they do not recommended subsequent annealing.
And the ONLY POSSIBLE explanation for such a ludacris policy is product liability standpoint ...ie lawyers.
And I will in fact have a good evening and you do the same.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,221
Messages
2,213,529
Members
79,449
Latest member
tornado-technologies
Back
Top