BigDMT said:
tjtjwdad said:
BigDMT said:
newgun said:
I brought a monarch home it was o.k. I took it back and got a v x 3 for a bit more money and it was a HUGE improvement. Just a great scope! And its made right here in Oregon and I will pay more for that.
Hate to burst your bubble, but your Leupold VX3 scope is "ASSEMBLED" in Oregon. It is "MADE" overseas in Asia...China I believe. Nikon is made in the Phillipines.
Just got of the horn with Leupold and they say "all" Gold-Ring products are made and assembled in Oregon. They do-not make their glass and I'm under the impression it comes from Asia. Non Gold-Ring are farmed out, no specifics given nor did ask but I took it to mean Windriver binoculars, range finders, bore sighters etc.
I believe they give tours so one could see for themsilves.
That sums it up then. They admitted it themselves. Case closed.
I know they "used" to be made in the US. But they are not anymore. And their warranty isn't transferable on anything but golden ring products, so that's gone to hell as well. Their optics aren't even in the same boat as higher priced optics when it comes to gathering light, but they still charge the same as other high priced optics.
I've owned Leupy scopes, Kenai HD spotting scope, and even Golden Ring binos. ALL left something to be desired. The only Leupold optic I like is my son's OLD 2-7X40 Golden Ring scope. Made back when EVERYTHING that came out the door was Golden Ring quality. Now anything but Golden Ring is junk. And the Golden Ring line is now overpriced for what you get IMO.
I know it hurts some of you long time Leupy fans to hear it, but your manufacturer is just like the rest. A sell out to China
BigDMT,
The VX3 scope is a gold-ring product. Unless it is a counterfeit it is made and assembled in Beaverton Oregon. The glass is imported, and they have repeatedly admitted it to me whenever I have asked. FWIW, I don't have a dog in the hunt and I do-not consider myself a “long time, loyal Leupold ownerâ€.
On topic though, I have never heard Leupold state that; "all" of their products are made and assembled in Oregonâ€. But I have heard them say, repeatedly; “all gold-ring products are made and assembled in Oregonâ€.
I do own Leupold (along with Burris, Nikon, Zeiss and Swarovski) scopes. They all have their pluses & minus. For me, it’s the customer service quality when things go south.
I know folks who have the same feelings as you appear to have about Leupold. They wouldn’t give a hoot in the devil’s den for one. More often than not it was because of quality and/or customer service. After hearing their stories and being in their shoes, I wouldn’t either. On customer service, you couldn’t give me a Nikon Monarch (SF) scope. But I will always take Nikon into consideration because they gave me excellent customer service when one of their scopes broke. Personally, I wished they would have repaired it and sent it back (old style (AO) Monarch scope). The same goes for Burris, never used Leupold, Zeiss or Swarvoski.
IMO, Leupold sat on their laurels to long and a whole host of competition not only caught them but in many cases, surpassed them. I’ve heard many “old-timers†if you will, echo many of your comments about Leupold. My VARI-X-III 3.5-10x40 was made in the early 80’s and it has never failed me. Both of my VX3’s have performed well for me, thus far. Although I’ve never used the service, I do like the multiple reticles Leupold offers. However, I’ll confess, when I start looking at scopes, I usually start with Zeiss. The Conquest line is very comparable with Leupold VX3 and optically, IMO it is superior. Swarovski’s glass is a tad better in the dark but unless you get a good deal, you’re paying a lot more $$$ for it.