• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Scope for my Rem 700 V in 7mm-08

BigDMT said:
If I were on a budget like that for a good 4-16X50 scope. I think the best bang for your buck is the newly released Pentax Game Seeker 30mm scopes. They used to only make them with 1" tubes and the optics were still outstanding for the price with the smaller tube. So you can bet that the new 30mm tube scopes are even better. Plus they added side focus, rear eye piece focus, and target turrets to the new Game Seeker line which is a huge PLUS! You can get one in 4-16X50mm with a 30mm tube, side focus, and target turrets for under $200. You could even get a 6-24X50mm with identical features for about the same price.

If I only had $300 to buy a scope and wanted nice optics with all the "bells and whistle's" that's where I'd spend my money. You'd be hard pressed to find a better scope even if you were willing to spend $500.

Here's a couple links to the scope.

http://swfa.com/Pentax-4-16x50-Gameseeker-30-Rifle-Scope-P48564.aspx

http://www.pentaximaging.com/sport-optics/products/Gameseeker_30_-_4x-16x50mm_Matte_%28PP-HT-SdPA%29#!product-highlights

I own two of these and two Gameseeker II scopes. Although they are made in China, they are a great value!!

It doesn't hurt that my son works for Pentax/Ricoh and I get a nice discount.
 
bootlaceb said:
Has anyone got the Pentax Gameseeker with the Precision Plex reticle? I would like to know how it compares to the Leupold Varmint reticle? Much thicker, or thinner or the same? Really difficult to get any info on the reticles. If there is a site where Pentax actually gives the dimensions, it would be appreciated.
Thanks

Since I don't have a Leupold Varmint scope I can't comment on the comparison of the reticle between the two. The Precision Plex reticle lines are thin. Not super fine, but fine enough not to interfere with the sight picture. If I were forced to measure them, they would be no thicker than the line made by a fine ballpoint pen.

You might be able to find what you're looking for here: http://www.pentaximaging.com/sport-optics/products/Gameseeker_30_-_4x-16x50mm_Matte_(PP-HT-SdPA)#!product-specs
 
You probably don't need a 30mm scope. All the 30mm tube does is allow more elevation. It doesn't let more light in and it adds weight. Are you planning to shoot to more than 600 yards?

At the price point you are looking into less is better. The more they add in one place the more that they have to take off somewhere else. (kind of like MTBs, add a cheap suspension fork, and downgrade the components group by 2 levels to pay for it)

I shoot my muzzle loader with a Bushnell DOA, inexpensive scope that gets the job done, I also have a Nightforce BR on my target rifle and another hunting rifle sporting a Swarovski. To an extent you get what you pay for, but you only need to pay for what you need. Are you shooting late dusk or very early morning, if not you don't need a big 50MM objective, and it adds height and weight to the scope.

My DOA 250 has put 3 deer in the freezer in the last 2 yrs. Take a look at the Bushnell Elite series.

SWFA Link to Bushnell Elites
 
WyleWD said:
ChrisNZ said:
I have the 4-16 SF Monarch on a walking varminter and as has been commented on by other forum members, it goes to pieces optically above say 14 power. It's basically fine under that and certainly OK mechanically but it's no top-end scope optically.

Chris-NZ

You might want to seriously consider calling Nikon and sending this thing back in for a check up. I've got and have owned quite a few Nikons and this issue you describe just simply doesn't happen if they are properly adjusted and in otherwise good working order. Especially on that model. WD

I unloaded my 6-24x50 Monarch (SF) for the very same reason. It is mentioned often on numerous web sites. On a different note, the 6.5-20x44 (AO) was good all thru it's zoome range.
 
I had a Pentax Lightseeker varable bought back in the last century....Went South on me 2 times, first on a 223 in SD....When it came back the second time it had a note attatched....NO MORE WARRANTY WORK.....LT
 
BigDMT said:
newgun said:
I brought a monarch home it was o.k. I took it back and got a v x 3 for a bit more money and it was a HUGE improvement. Just a great scope! And its made right here in Oregon and I will pay more for that.

Hate to burst your bubble, but your Leupold VX3 scope is "ASSEMBLED" in Oregon. It is "MADE" overseas in Asia...China I believe. Nikon is made in the Phillipines.

Assembled is an overstatement, they put a sticker on it and repack it in Oregon.. it's assembled in China or other asian country like almost all other optics.. only a few exceptions like Zeiss and other very high priced optics.
 
Are you gents seriously claiming the VX3 is now NOT US made?? I had read and knew the VX1 line was an import as well as their Wind River bino's etc awhile back. I didn't realize the VX3 was also farmed out?? So then what exactly does Leupy still actually manufacture here?

Used to like Burris when they were all US made. Then bought a couple of the Fullfield II's and they were junk as far as I was concerned. Haven't bought a new scope for years but buy used Leupy's, B&L Balvar's and my fav the old Weaver T models. If Leupy is pretty much import chit then I guess I don't have to wonder about saving for a new model!!!! :(
 
WRT rifle/pistol scopes; I've always been under the impression that all "Gold-Ring" scopes were made and assembled in Beaverton, OR and the glass was from Asia. Range finders, Binoculars, spotting scopes...haven't any idea.

I just checked all of my Leupolds and none are marked on the scope where they were made or assembled (VX3 and VARI-X-III). I'll dig out the boxes and see if they have references. In adddition, there are counterfit issues and Leupold does point to some of the indicators on their website.
 
BigDMT said:
newgun said:
I brought a monarch home it was o.k. I took it back and got a v x 3 for a bit more money and it was a HUGE improvement. Just a great scope! And its made right here in Oregon and I will pay more for that.

Hate to burst your bubble, but your Leupold VX3 scope is "ASSEMBLED" in Oregon. It is "MADE" overseas in Asia...China I believe. Nikon is made in the Phillipines.

Just got of the horn with Leupold and they say "all" Gold-Ring products are made and assembled in Oregon. They do-not make their glass and I'm under the impression it comes from Asia. Non Gold-Ring are farmed out, no specifics given nor did ask but I took it to mean Windriver binoculars, range finders, bore sighters etc.

I believe they give tours so one could see for themsilves.
 
Having lived in the greater Portland Or area for over 30 years and using nothing but Leupold scopes, lots of them in that time and knowing at least 6 people that work at the Beaverton site I am positive that the scopes are made here. Their glass probably isn't but everything else is. FRJ
 
Have had and seen many....would suggest if you can find an older Burris Signature (not Select) in 4-16, it will be an excellent value with forever warranty.
 
tjtjwdad said:
BigDMT said:
newgun said:
I brought a monarch home it was o.k. I took it back and got a v x 3 for a bit more money and it was a HUGE improvement. Just a great scope! And its made right here in Oregon and I will pay more for that.

Hate to burst your bubble, but your Leupold VX3 scope is "ASSEMBLED" in Oregon. It is "MADE" overseas in Asia...China I believe. Nikon is made in the Phillipines.

Just got of the horn with Leupold and they say "all" Gold-Ring products are made and assembled in Oregon. They do-not make their glass and I'm under the impression it comes from Asia. Non Gold-Ring are farmed out, no specifics given nor did ask but I took it to mean Windriver binoculars, range finders, bore sighters etc.

I believe they give tours so one could see for themsilves.

That sums it up then. They admitted it themselves. Case closed.

I know they "used" to be made in the US. But they are not anymore. And their warranty isn't transferable on anything but golden ring products, so that's gone to hell as well. Their optics aren't even in the same boat as higher priced optics when it comes to gathering light, but they still charge the same as other high priced optics.

I've owned Leupy scopes, Kenai HD spotting scope, and even Golden Ring binos. ALL left something to be desired. The only Leupold optic I like is my son's OLD 2-7X40 Golden Ring scope. Made back when EVERYTHING that came out the door was Golden Ring quality. Now anything but Golden Ring is junk. And the Golden Ring line is now overpriced for what you get IMO.

I know it hurts some of you long time Leupy fans to hear it, but your manufacturer is just like the rest. A sell out to China
 
FRJ said:
Having lived in the greater Portland Or area for over 30 years and using nothing but Leupold scopes, lots of them in that time and knowing at least 6 people that work at the Beaverton site I am positive that the scopes are made here. Their glass probably isn't but everything else is. FRJ

it´s a scope... nothing but glass, empty space and an aluminum tube... if the glass isn't made in USA then the scope isn't either...
 
BigDMT said:
tjtjwdad said:
BigDMT said:
newgun said:
I brought a monarch home it was o.k. I took it back and got a v x 3 for a bit more money and it was a HUGE improvement. Just a great scope! And its made right here in Oregon and I will pay more for that.

Hate to burst your bubble, but your Leupold VX3 scope is "ASSEMBLED" in Oregon. It is "MADE" overseas in Asia...China I believe. Nikon is made in the Phillipines.

Just got of the horn with Leupold and they say "all" Gold-Ring products are made and assembled in Oregon. They do-not make their glass and I'm under the impression it comes from Asia. Non Gold-Ring are farmed out, no specifics given nor did ask but I took it to mean Windriver binoculars, range finders, bore sighters etc.

I believe they give tours so one could see for themsilves.

That sums it up then. They admitted it themselves. Case closed.

I know they "used" to be made in the US. But they are not anymore. And their warranty isn't transferable on anything but golden ring products, so that's gone to hell as well. Their optics aren't even in the same boat as higher priced optics when it comes to gathering light, but they still charge the same as other high priced optics.

I've owned Leupy scopes, Kenai HD spotting scope, and even Golden Ring binos. ALL left something to be desired. The only Leupold optic I like is my son's OLD 2-7X40 Golden Ring scope. Made back when EVERYTHING that came out the door was Golden Ring quality. Now anything but Golden Ring is junk. And the Golden Ring line is now overpriced for what you get IMO.

I know it hurts some of you long time Leupy fans to hear it, but your manufacturer is just like the rest. A sell out to China

BigDMT,
The VX3 scope is a gold-ring product. Unless it is a counterfeit it is made and assembled in Beaverton Oregon. The glass is imported, and they have repeatedly admitted it to me whenever I have asked. FWIW, I don't have a dog in the hunt and I do-not consider myself a “long time, loyal Leupold owner”.

On topic though, I have never heard Leupold state that; "all" of their products are made and assembled in Oregon”. But I have heard them say, repeatedly; “all gold-ring products are made and assembled in Oregon”.

I do own Leupold (along with Burris, Nikon, Zeiss and Swarovski) scopes. They all have their pluses & minus. For me, it’s the customer service quality when things go south.

I know folks who have the same feelings as you appear to have about Leupold. They wouldn’t give a hoot in the devil’s den for one. More often than not it was because of quality and/or customer service. After hearing their stories and being in their shoes, I wouldn’t either. On customer service, you couldn’t give me a Nikon Monarch (SF) scope. But I will always take Nikon into consideration because they gave me excellent customer service when one of their scopes broke. Personally, I wished they would have repaired it and sent it back (old style (AO) Monarch scope). The same goes for Burris, never used Leupold, Zeiss or Swarvoski.

IMO, Leupold sat on their laurels to long and a whole host of competition not only caught them but in many cases, surpassed them. I’ve heard many “old-timers” if you will, echo many of your comments about Leupold. My VARI-X-III 3.5-10x40 was made in the early 80’s and it has never failed me. Both of my VX3’s have performed well for me, thus far. Although I’ve never used the service, I do like the multiple reticles Leupold offers. However, I’ll confess, when I start looking at scopes, I usually start with Zeiss. The Conquest line is very comparable with Leupold VX3 and optically, IMO it is superior. Swarovski’s glass is a tad better in the dark but unless you get a good deal, you’re paying a lot more $$$ for it.
 
I used to love Leupold like everyone else back in the days when everything they made was top notch with no fault fully transferable warranties on everything that came out the door and was honored as long as the optic was in existence on Earth.

My father-in-law has a pair of old Leupold binos that cost him $240 in 1982. That was a lot of money back then for binos. But still affordable for the working man who was serious about hunting. They have that little golden ring around the objectives like every Leupold product did back then so they were the best quality. Now it costs nearly $900 for a pair of Leupold golden ring binos (which I owned 2 years ago) and they don't even compare to the old binos from 1982. I've compared the 2 versions side by side in every lighting condition. When compared to the older style Leupy binos, the new Golden Ring binos have horrible eye relief, a fussy eye box, don't gather light as well, are overly heavy for their size, and have a very narrow field of view that requires constant focus adjustment when viewing objects at different distances. Don't get me wrong, the new GR's are nice optics, just not as nice as the old style binos. Clarity was pretty much equal, but all those other annoying downsides I mentioned about the newer style binos make long glassing sessions very bothersome and uncomfortable.

Not sure how they figured they would just go ahead and start making a far inferior product to their old design and charge 4 times the money, but they did. The old style Leupolds are closer in comparison to my Leica Ultravid binos than they are to the new Golen Ring binos. Of course no Leupold bino will ever best a Leica bino, but the old style isn't far off.

I even compared a set of Wind River Cascade Binos to my in-law's old Leupy's. That isn't even worth wasting your time if you want to try it. The Wind River binos are complete junk. Might as well keep them stowed away until it's 100% daylight out because you won't see anything before that.

I'm basically upset because they used to be "America's Optic". Everything they made was super high quality and almost every sportsman could afford them. Now you have to pay an arm and a leg to get their highest quality and I honestly don't think it's quite as good as it used to be. So now if I consider spending a lot of money on optics of any sort, Leupold is the last company on my mind.

I feel like they turned their backs on caring about the American blue collar working man/sportsman being able to afford good quality glass....
 
the older i get the more i just shake my head...its very dissapointing in todays world..and its sad to say that it isnt probly going to get any better....everything anymore either scope, guns, vechicles, tools, etc.. is all truthfully junk anymore...just a while back a young kid was showing me his new truck and was really bragging about how good the chrome bumper looked on the truck...i told him...lean down here and look on the back side of this...i had to show him it was actually plastic with some type of chrome look-a-like paint on it...its not real chrome anymore i told him...he still liked it...but he wasnt around when a real chrome bumper come out on vechicles...i also told him to pull off his so called leather shoes...i said look...inside is leather linning ....out side is man made materials...he couldnt believe it so i told him to read the label inside...sure enough...what he thought was an all leather shoe was only leather lined on the inside...nothing anymore is what it used to be
 
fredhorace77 said:
the older i get the more i just shake my head...its very dissapointing in todays world..and its sad to say that it isnt probly going to get any better....everything anymore either scope, guns, vechicles, tools, etc.. is all truthfully junk anymore...just a while back a young kid was showing me his new truck and was really bragging about how good the chrome bumper looked on the truck...i told him...lean down here and look on the back side of this...i had to show him it was actually plastic with some type of chrome look-a-like paint on it...its not real chrome anymore i told him...he still liked it...but he wasnt around when a real chrome bumper come out on vechicles...i also told him to pull off his so called leather shoes...i said look...inside is leather linning ....out side is man made materials...he couldnt believe it so i told him to read the label inside...sure enough...what he thought was an all leather shoe was only leather lined on the inside...nothing anymore is what it used to be

Sadly, I'm afraid you're correct in your observation and forecast. In fact, I'm almost afraid to buy parts for any of my cars because the ones that are worn out needing replaced are probably better quality than the ones replacing them.

When & why we went to a consumer base economy is beyond me.
 
BigDMT said:
I feel like they turned their backs on caring about the American blue collar working man/sportsman being able to afford good quality glass....

IMO, one thing is for sure, a lot of competitors that Leupold use to stand head & shoulders above have caught them and taken a big bite out of their market share. I really feel they sat on their accomplishments too long.
 
tjtjwdad said:
BigDMT said:
I feel like they turned their backs on caring about the American blue collar working man/sportsman being able to afford good quality glass....

IMO, one thing is for sure, a lot of competitors that Leupold use to stand head & shoulders above have caught them and taken a big bite out of their market share. I really feel they sat on their accomplishments too long.

Very true. Companies that offer great quality for the price like Nikon have already given Leupold's sales a good blow and companies like Vortex that are charging full speed ahead with their second-to-none no fault fully transferable warranties and ever increasing quality in optical clarity and reliability will hurt them even further.

Eventually Leupold will have to change their game or risk going up in smoke with the next generation of sportsmen that only knows them for who they are now and never knew how good they once were when it came to affordable quality. The next generation will have little or no loyalty to Leupold optics with the track the company is on.

Another company to really watch for in the states is Hawke optics. I've recently acquired a couple of their optics. The sidewinder 30 scope in 6-24X56mm and an older style 20-60X60mm Endurance spotting scope to be specific. Although those two products are not top shelf quality, they are definitely worth more than what you pay IMO. Extremely clear optics with repeatable adjustments, just have to work on a few minor details and they'll really have something going for them.
Of course Hawke is a China made optic from a European owned company like most of the mid priced optic manufacturer's, but they will probably be right in the fray before too long. The company seems to be on the right track to compete in the US mid priced optic market, they just need to get their foot in the door a little further with American sportsmen.
 
Another one I hear echo's about is a company called Minox. If I understand correctly, they use the same glass (Schott) that Zeiss uses. Speaking of Zeiss, here is an interesting video I came across a couple years back of a tour through Zeiss's sports optic factory. Grab a snack because it's approx 30 minutes long but I found it real interesting.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygtBaJ3n7u8&feature=player_embedded
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,337
Messages
2,216,567
Members
79,554
Latest member
GerSteve
Back
Top